BELIEVE Religious Information Source相信宗教信息來源

We think that He would wish ALL people to have access to and understanding of ACCURATE and HONEST information on all religious subjects.我們認為，他希望所有的人都可以訪問和了解所有宗教題材的準確和真實的信息。 Christians believe that He has installed an Indwelling Holy Spirit in each person such that the person then has Divine assistance regarding Discerning what is correct regarding the best way of Worshipping the One True Lord.基督徒相信，在每個人，這樣的人有神聖的援助，明眼人就崇拜一個真正的上帝最好的方式是正確的，他安裝了一個留置聖靈。 Religious systems tend to try to force followers to accept ONLY what they Teach them, and to be deaf or even adversarial to things anyone else might say.宗教系統往往，試圖迫使追隨者只接受他們教給他們的東西，是聾的，甚至是對抗性的東西其他人可能會說，。 There is nothing wrong with Trusting and following your religious leader, and indeed, it is important to do so.沒有什麼錯的信任和你的宗教領袖，而事實上，它這樣做是很重要的。 But there also needs to be some system of checks and balances where the Lord's True Message might not be distorted.但也需要有一些系統的制衡，其中主的真實信息可能不被扭曲。

We have recently realized that if Jesus Himself would arrive at any of many thousands of Christian Churches, in His robe and with His long hair and general appearance, He would certainly be denied admission to the Church!最近，我們已經意識到，如果耶穌自己將到達任何成千上萬的基督教教會，在他的衣襟，他的長頭髮，一般的外觀，他肯定會被拒絕入場的教會！ What does THAT say about our modern understanding of what He tried to Teach us?我們的現代理解，他試圖教給我們什麼，說什麼？

The different religions and Denominations each absolutely insist that THEIR interpretation is superior to all others.不同的宗教和教派的絕對堅持認為，他們的解釋是優於所有其他的。 Isn't that Arrogance, something that the Lord Wished us to avoid?這不是傲慢，主希望我們能夠避免的東西嗎？ Didn't He Try to Teach us Humility and Tolerance of others?沒有他試圖教給我們的謙卑和寬容他人呢？ It seems to us that if a religion chooses to refer to the One True God by a somewhat confusing collection of Three Different Names (Father, Son and Holy Spirit) or to see Him as very Harsh (Jewish) or Loving (Christianity), does it necessarily mean that HE is any Different?在我們看來，如果一種宗教選擇一個有點混亂收集三個不同的名稱（聖父，聖子和聖靈）是指一的真神，或看到他在非常惡劣的（猶太人）或愛（基督教），這不一定意味著他有什麼不同嗎？ Probably not.很可能不會。 It probably simply indicates that we humans are not nearly as smart as we often want to claim, and that there are many, many things that we only vaguely comprehend.它可能只是表明，我們人類是不是幾乎一樣聰明，因為我們經常要索賠，有很多很多的事情，我們只是含糊地理解。 There actually seems a credible possibility that we are all actually "speaking the same language of Love and Adoration for the One True God of Abraham" but simply do not (yet) realize it!實際上似乎有一個可信的可能性，我們都是“講同一種語言的愛和崇拜獨一的真神，就是亞伯拉罕”，但根本就沒有（）實現！

Also Prov.此外省。 2:3-5; Prov. 2:3-5;省。 3:13; Prov. 3:13;省。 15:14; Prov. 15:14;省。 23:23; and 2Peter 1:5. 23:23和彼得後書1:5。

Saint Clement of Alexandria may have described this most fully, (around 200 AD), in the Stromata, Book VIII, Chapter I .聖克萊門特的亞歷山德里亞可能最充分的，（約公元200年）， 在子座，書第八章我 。

It seems that most people have an enormous misunderstanding regarding what a "scholarly text" actually is!看來，大多數人有關於什麼是“學術文本”實際上是一個巨大的誤解！ A good example might be our presentation on Arguments for the Existence of God. If most people tried to compose that presentation, including virtually any Church or its personnel, they would assemble it in the "obvious" way.一個很好的例子可能是我們介紹論據為上帝的存在。如果大多數人試圖介紹，包括幾乎所有的教會及其工作人員組成，他們將“明顯”的方式組裝起來。 And that would not possibly qualify for being a "scholarly work" no matter how brilliantly it was researched and presented!這不會是一個“學術作品”不管如何出色，它是研究並提出資格！ If you look at our presentation linked here, you will see a prominent distinction which qualifies it as being scholarly.如果你看看我們的介紹鏈接在這裡，你會看到一個顯著的區別，有資格作為學術。 Right after the initial presentation of the arguments FOR the Existence of God, that author has a section which discusses the arguments AGAINST the Existence of God!初期表現為上帝存在的論據後，即有一節討論上帝存在的論據，反對！ Most Christian Ministry seem to be viciously against including such things!大部分基督教部似乎是惡狠狠地對包括這樣的事情！ Many have told me that I am certain to go to Hell for allowing such things to be included in BELIEVE!很多人告訴我，我一定會去地獄中認為，允許這樣的事情！ Amazing! They INSIST on only telling THEIR side of any stories or any issues, apparently deciding that THEY are each brilliant enough to determine what their Church Members should be allowed to hear and what their Church Members should be denied hearing! No actual scholar would ever do that!太神 ​​奇了！ 他們堅持只告訴自己身邊的故事或任何問題，顯然是決定他們是每一個的輝煌足夠的，以確定他們的教會成員應該被允許聽到他們的教會成員應該被拒絕聽！沒有實際的學者將永遠做到這一點！ It is considered critically important to always present BOTH sides, ALL sides, of any issue, logically and fairly.它被認為是非常重要的，始終存在正反兩面，各方面的任何問題，邏輯和公平的。 Scholars then rarely actually extend that to forming conclusions, other than what is solidly based on the arguments and known facts.學者那麼實際上很少延伸，形成結論，什麼是牢固的基礎上的參數和已知的事實。 In contrast, we find it immensely frustrating that MOST Christian books, articles and speeches tend to ONLY provide SELECTIVE EVIDENCE which then appears to totally support whatever conclusions that the (Christian) writer or speaker wants to claim.相比之下，我們覺得非常令人沮喪，最基督教書籍，文章和言論往往只提供選擇性的證據，似乎完全支持任何結論，（基督教）的作家或揚聲器權利要求。 We hope you see the distinction, as it really is very, very important.我們希望你看到的區別，因為它確實是非常非常重要的。 Regarding BELIEVE, we do not necessarily want to present thoughts or arguments which appear to oppose Christianity or some Church, but in an effort at presenting scholastic honesty, we feel that it is critically important that we ONLY present articles by scholar-authors which DO consider all sides of any issue.就相信，我們不一定要現在的想法或出現反對基督教或一些教會的參數，但在展示學術誠信，努力，我們覺得這是非常重要的，我們只本文章的學者，作者考慮各方面的任何問題。 Virtually every argument and every group has wonderful assets but also a few warts!幾乎每一個參數，並且每個組都有精彩的資產，但也有一些疣！ We think it would be potentially deceptive if we tried to ignore the existence of those warts!我們認為這將是潛在的欺騙性，如果我們試圖忽視這些疣的存在！ This text makes clear that we have great confidence in the brains and the personal Discernment of each reader, especially since we are confident that the Indwelling Holy Spirit will assist each person regarding that.這段文字清楚地表明，我們的大腦和個人法眼的每一個讀者有很大的信心，特別是因為我們有信心留置的聖靈會幫助每個人，。 So we have no concerns whatever regarding the fact that our scholar-authors sometimes discuss matters which might seem unsettling to Christians.所以，我們沒有任何關於這方面的，我們的學者，作者有時會討論似乎令人不安的基督徒關注。 We feel that this is far better than the only alternative that we are aware of, where WE would select a single viewpoint to try to present to all our visitors.我們認為，這是遠遠優於唯一的選擇，我們都知道，在這裡我們將選擇一個單一的觀點，試圖呈現給所有的參觀者。

Several of the most important topics in BELIEVE have presentations that extend over 100 screenfuls of text! The presentation of the Roman Catholic Church is more than 30 screens in length. 幾個最重要的課題中認為，有超過100個屏幕的文字，演示，延長！表示的羅馬天主教教會的長度超過30畫面。 The one on God is about 150 screens in length.一個在上帝的長度大約是150屏幕。 The one on The Childhood of Jesus is nearly 500 screens in length!一個在耶穌的童年是在長度近500屏幕！ Even a generally unfamiliar subject like Supralapsarianism is about five screens in length, with several links to other BELIEVE pages that are closely related to that subject.即使是一般陌生的課題，如supralapsarianism的是五個屏幕的長度，有幾個鏈接到其他信網頁，這個問題是密切相關的。 Some of the more obscure subjects are covered in just one or two screens.一些比較模糊的主題都包含在一個或兩個屏幕。

There is certainly a multitude of Christian and other religious sites on the Internet.當然是有眾多的基督教和其他宗教場所在互聯網上。 Many of them are informative, but they seem to generally present only their own view of whatever subjects they discuss.他們中的許多信息，但他們似乎普遍提出自己的看法，無論他們討論的主題。 That might be valuable, but it can often cause an incomplete understanding of those subjects.這可能是有價值的，但它往往導致完全理解這些主題。 How can a student of Christianity or any other religion truly understand any subject if he/she only has access to one narrow viewpoint?基督教或其他宗教的一個學生如何才能真正了解任何主題，如果他/她只有一個狹窄的觀點嗎？ Yes, we realize that there might be value in sometimes presenting ONLY ONE approach, of NOT bringing up matters which might cause some Christians to become confused or uncertain.是的，我們認識到，有可能是有價值的，有時呈現只有一個方法，沒有帶來問題，這可能會導致一些基督徒變得混亂或不確定的。 Fine.精細。

Our Non-Denominational Christian Church thinks that in general it is wrong to consistently do that.我們的非宗派的基督教教會認為，這是錯誤的，始終做到這一點。 How could a person develop a solid foundation for Faith if incomplete or inaccurate or distorted information is all that is available?一個人怎麼能發展奠定了堅實的基礎信仰，如果不完整或不準確的或歪曲的信息提供的所有嗎？ What if your First Grade Teacher only decided to teach you her favorite letters of the alphabet and not all 26 of them? Our approach is to try to imagine how Jesus might have presented religious information. Would He have only presented some facts that supported a point He wanted to make?如果你的一年級老師只教你她最喜歡的英文字母，而不是所有26 我們的做法是嘗試想像耶穌可能提出的宗教信息。他只提出了一些事實支持他想要做什麼呢？ We doubt it!我們對此表示懷疑！ Would He have presented any statement that He did not truly believe to be true, or that was otherwise incomplete or inaccurate or misleading or deceptive?他已發表任何聲明，他並沒有真正相信是真實的，或者說，否則不完整或不準確或具誤導性或欺騙性的？ We doubt it!我們對此表示懷疑！ We think that He would have patiently sat down with anyone who had questions and He would have helped each person to fully understand the answers to those questions.我們認為，他會耐心地坐下來與任何人有問題，他會幫助每個人充分認識到這些問題的答案。

We often consider a real situation which existed in the Early Church.我們常常認為，在早期教會真實的情況存在。 The full Bible as we know it was only finalized nearly 400 years after Jesus lived.完整的聖經，因為我們知道這是近400年後完成耶穌生活。 We sometimes consider a passionate Christian of around 80 AD, who happened to NOT have an entire Bible but just a SINGLE SHEET from ONE LETTER of Paul.有時我們會考慮一個充滿激情的基督教公元80年左右，發生在沒有一個完整的聖經，但只是從一個字母，保羅在一張紙上。 What could the Lord have expected of that person?主所期望的那個人嗎？ A comprehensive understanding of all aspects of Christianity?全面了解各方面的基督教嗎？ That would not be possible for him!這對他來說是不可能的！ But he certainly would read that page every day and certainly memorize it.但他肯定會讀取該頁面每一天，一定記住它。 Whatever specifics that Paul might have discussed in that page, this man would have centered his life upon.無論保羅有可能在該頁面中討論的細節，這名男子將集中自己的生命時。 And we feel that the Lord would be totally Pleased with him for that effort.我們覺得主會完全滿意他這種努力。 Curiously, when I have brought this story up to several hundred other Ministers over the years, at least two hundred of those Christian Ministers immediately told me that that man went to Hell, for not having FULLY followed all the aspects of Christianity!奇怪的是，當我把這個故事幾百個其他部長多年來，至少有200那些基督教的牧師馬上告訴我，那個人去了地獄，沒有完全遵循了所有的基督教方面的！ I am always astounded at hearing Ministers say that, and it terrifies me regarding what they might be Teaching in their own Churches!我總是驚訝於聽到部長說，它讓我驚恐萬分，他們可能在自己的教堂教學！ They are either ignorant or overlook the fact that the complete Bible only was settled on around 390 AD, but they still demand that earlier Christians be knowledgeable regarding a Bible which did not then even exist!他們不知道或忽略了一個事實，一個完整的聖經結算約390 AD，但他們仍然需要知識，早期的基督徒對聖經沒有那麼即使存在！ It seems to me that those modern Ministers believe that Christianity is totally Legalistic, where they must not have read the parts of the Bible that make clear Jesus' attitude about such things!在我看來，那些現代的部長們認為，基督教是完全墨守成規，他們必須沒有讀過“聖經”的部分，表明了耶穌的態度這樣的事情！

BELIEVE is here with the intent of permitting our visitors to access all the (credible) perspectives that we are aware of, with the intention of enabling DEEPER Devotion to the Lord.相信這是這裡的意圖，使我們的遊客訪問所有的（可靠）的觀點，我們都知道，能夠更深的奉獻給主的意圖。

Well, we have a disadvantage here! 好了，我們在這裡有一個缺點！ We are not Jesus! 我們不是耶穌！ We do not have His Knowledge and Understanding! So, we just try the best we can to supply the most accurate, understandable and complete information we can, on each of these many subjects. 我們沒有他的知識和理解，所以，我們只是盡盡我們所能提供最準確，易於理解和完整的信息，我們可以在這些多學科的。 That is basically the core reason for the BELIEVE Religious Information Source web-site. We try to not express opinions but only present the facts and all of the generally accepted attitudes on each subject.這基本上是最核心的原因相信宗教信息來源網站， 我們盡量不發表意見，但只擺事實，在每一個主體普遍接受的態度。

BELIEVE has two parallel home pages, one with the subjects listed alphabetically and the other with more central subjects at the start of the list. “BELIEVE有兩個平行的主頁，更加重要的主題，在開始的列表按字母順序列出的其他的主題之一。 (The subject list is to the right, and a link above it can get you to the alphabetical list.) These articles were written by many world-renowned scholars in their specific subjects. We felt that such scholars were the best available authorities in each of the many subjects. （主題列表中是正確的，它上面的鏈接可以讓你按字母順序排列）。 這些文章寫的許多世界知名的學者在其特定的主題。我們認為，這樣的學者是最好的可用當局每年的許多主題。 We are very aware that there have probably been millions of articles written by religious scholars over the centuries, and we have only been able (so far) to review a tiny fraction of them.我們非常清楚，有可能是幾百萬的宗教學者撰寫的文章，在幾個世紀以來，我們只能夠（到目前為止）審查的一小部分。 That means that this BELIEVE site should forever be a work-in-progress, and it will hopefully forever get better and better!這意味著，這相信的網站應該永遠是一個正在進行中的工作，並希望將永遠讓自己變得更好！ We sometimes say that in another thirty years, BELIEVE might start to resemble something that the Lord might be Pleased with!我們有時會說，在另一個30年，相信類似的東西可能會開始，主會很高興與！

In the process of selecting the 7,000+ articles that are currently included in BELIEVE, we examined over 50,000 articles that we did not include.選擇了7000 +的文章中認為，目前在這個過程中，我們研究了超過50,000篇文章，我們並沒有包括。 If an article seemed biased or incomplete or not solidly based on accepted scholastic standards, we did not include it.如果一篇文章似乎偏頗或不完整或不牢固的基礎上公認的學術標準，我們沒有把它列入。 It is our hope that the remaining articles are useful to the visitors to this site.這是我們的希望，剩下的文章是有用的遊客到這個網站。

Whether your interest is casual curiosity or deep philosophical research, BELIEVE should certainly be helpful. Many of the subject presentations start with a General level presentation of the subject, which is often followed by very comprehensive Advanced presentation(s) for student and Ministry research. 無論你的興趣是隨意的的好奇心或深的哲學研究，認為應該有一定幫助。很多的主題演講開始， 介紹的很全面（S）為學生和研究部的高級演示文稿的主題，這是經常跟隨一般水平 。 Actual Scripture from the Bible is generally not included, but many thousands of Scriptural references are included, as are extensive bibliographies (for most of the articles) for even further study.實際從“聖經”經文，一般不包括在內，但成千上萬的聖經引用的，廣泛的書目（的文章），為進一步的研究。

Have you ever been a little unclear when your Minister refers to sanctification in a sermon? Or ultradispensationalism? Or Baptism? Or infralapsarianism? Or Salvation? Well, most Ministers aren't going to even mention two of these very important aspects of Christian Faith in their Sermons! 你是否曾經有些不明確時，你的部長是指成聖的講道，還是ultradispensationalism或洗禮或infralapsarianism？還是拯救？那麼，大多數的部長們甚至不會提及基督教信仰的這些非常重要的方面，他們的布道！ But they would if they could!但他們，如果他們能！ Or maybe you wanted to learn more about your friend's Methodism? Or about Amish beliefs?或者，也許你想了解更多關於你的朋友的衛理公會或關於阿米甚人的信仰？ Or the history of The Lord's Prayer? Have you ever been curious about just how our modern beliefs in Jesus got refined to where they are today?或者的歷史主禱文？你有過好奇，只是我們的現代信仰的耶穌細化到了今天，他們是如何？ Or you wanted deeper understanding of any of hundreds of other interesting religious topics?或者你想更深入地了解任何其他數以百計的有趣的宗教主題？

These are some reasons where you may want to browse through BELIEVE!這些都是一些原因，你可能想瀏覽BELIEVE！

As mentioned above, we have gone to considerable effort to eliminate bias from this collection of articles. It is reasonable for most authors to be enthusiastic for their subject, but if an author showed such an extreme attitude that possible distortion of facts might happen, WE LEFT SUCH AN ARTICLE OUT! BELIEVE is meant as an information source which has the most "level playing field" possible, so that readers can count on getting useful and fair and accurate information. 正如上面提到的，我們已經走了相當大的努力，以消除偏見從這個集合的文章，大多數作者是熱心為他們的主題是合理的，但如果作者表明歪曲事實，可能會發生這種極端的態度，留下了這樣的文章出來！ 相信是最“水平公平的競爭環境”的可能，使讀者可以指望得到有用的，公平的和準確的信息作為信息源。 There is only one substantial bias that was NOT removed, that against Satanists, Atheists, and similar groups.有一個龐大的偏見不除，對撒旦教徒，無神論者，和類似的團體。 We considered including some of their own information, to balance some of the negative comments that some of our included authors make, but we decided that we did NOT want to encourage or publicize or support the activities or beliefs of such groups.我們認為，包括一些自己的信息，以平衡，使一些包括作者的一些負面評論，但我們決定，我們不希望鼓勵或宣傳或支持這些團體的活動或信念。

If you get the impression that any particular presentation in this library shows substantial bias for or against any group or belief system, please let us know by an E-mail message or a postal letter.如果你得到的印象是，此庫中的任何特定的演示文稿顯示或針對任何團體或信仰體系的重大偏差，請讓我們知道了一個E-mail消息或郵信。 We hope to forever improve BELIEVE, and you can help!我們希望永遠相信，你能幫助！

People regularly send in manuscripts and essays which they hope to have added to our BELIEVE site.人們經常發送的稿件和文章，他們希望加入我們相信網站。 Unfortunately, most of them cannot be used here.不幸的是，它們中的大部分不能被用在這裡。 One characteristic we insist on is that ALL perspectives on a subject or issue be equally and fairly discussed, as is the case in any credible scholarly work.我們堅持的一個特點是，所有的主題或問題的觀點是公平和平等地討論，是任何可信的學術工作的情況。 When most people feel motivated to write an essay, it is because they have very strong feelings regarding one particular viewpoint on the subject.當大部分人都覺得動機，寫一篇文章，那是因為他們有很強烈的感受，關於這個問題的一個特定的觀點。 In many places, there is nothing wrong with that, in "promoting" that particular perspective.在許多地方，有什麼不妥之處，在“促進”，即特定的角度。 It is even often a great way of encouraging people to accept that particular belief.甚至經常是一個偉大的方式鼓勵人們接受特別的信仰。 But BELIEVE is meant to present ALL perspectives as equally as is possible, and so "sales pitches" for any one position are not generally desirable here. ，但相信意味著目前所有觀點，同樣是可能的，而且這樣的“推銷”的任何一個位置不是一般的理想在這裡。 In many cases, such an essay could be fairly easily expanded to include the opposing viewpoints.在許多情況下，這樣的文章可以很容易地擴展到包括反對意見。 There have been many wonderful manuscripts sent in, which could have been used with such a modification, but not otherwise.已經有許多精彩的稿件發送，本來可以用這樣的修改，而不是其他。

The individual web-page presentations are all designed to display properly on any home computer.各個Web頁的演示文稿都被設計為任何家庭計算機上正確顯示。 They are hopefully also compatible with the obsolete computers and browsers which Missionaries often have to use.他們也希望這些傳教士經常要使用的過時的電腦和瀏覽器兼容。 (The files are each made absolutely as small as they can be so that such Missionaries can have shorter Internet access times and expenses.) BELIEVE doesn't contain banners or other images that might interfere with such use. （文件都絕對小，因為他們可以使這些傳教士可以有更短的上網時間和費用。）相信，不包含這種使用橫幅廣告或其他圖像可能會干擾。

If someone thoroughly studied the entire contents of BELIEVE (equivalent to over 10,000 pages of typewritten text, over 30,000 screenfuls) and also the Bible, the resultant religious knowledge would be very close to that of a Divinity Degree from a Seminary! We realize that most people aren't going to use it that thoroughly! 如果有人深入研究的全部內容，相信（相當於超過10,000頁的鍵入文本，超過30,000個屏幕）和“聖經”，得到的宗教知識是從神學院的神度非常接近我們認識到，最人都不會去使用它，徹底！ But if you keep the downloadable BELIEVE program on your computer's hard drive, or keep a bookmark for this web-site in your browser, its information will be rapidly accessible, faster than you could find it in a reference book!但如果你繼續下載BELIEVE程序在您的計算機硬盤驅動器，或保留在您的瀏覽器本網站的書籤，其信息將被快速訪問，速度比你能找到它的參考用書！

The way both subject lists are set up encourages browsing. You or your kids might have 15 minutes available one day. 成立兩個主題列表的方式，鼓勵瀏覽。您或您的孩子可能有15分鐘可一天。 You COULD play some computer game!你可以玩一些電腦遊戲！ But if BELIEVE is there, you might just as well decide to learn a little about Arminianism or about Evangelicalism. You don't need to commit a huge block of time to it (but you could!)但是，如果認為有，你可能只是決定學習一門約的亞米紐斯或約福音派小。你不需要承諾的時間給它一個巨大的塊（但你可以！）

Even very devout Christians will probably find many unfamiliar terms in the list at right.即使是非常虔誠的基督徒也許會發現很多不熟悉的術語列表中的權利。 Many Protestant Christians do not realize that many things like the above mentioned Arminianism probably contributed (in one way or another) in a substantial way in the development of the beliefs of the Church they attend!許多基督徒沒有意識到，很多事情可能像上面提到的阿民念主義（或其他方式）的一個主要方式的發展，他們參加教會的信仰！ Very few Christians seem to know that nearly all modern Christian Churches are Semi-Sabbatarian!只有極少數的基督徒似乎都知道，幾乎所有的現代基督教教會半守安息日！

For Ministry 對於部

BELIEVE can be a useful source for when Pastors are assembling their Sermons. 相信可以牧師組裝他們的布道時的有用來源。 Many of the topics include very comprehensive discussions, especially the Advanced articles.許多主題，包括非常全面的討論，特別是“高級”的文章。
BELIEVE can also be helpful to Ministry when a Congregation member asks a question about an obscure subject.也相信能有利於部時，會眾成員問一個問題，關於一個不起眼的主題。 Refreshing that knowledge gained on Photius in Divinity School can be quickly done!刷新獲得的知識Photius在神學院可以很快就完成了！

For testifying to others 為了證明給別人

BELIEVE is a useful information source when you are about to testify to someone of another Faith. 相信這是一個有用的信息源，當你作證的另一種信仰的人。 Articles describing nearly all world belief systems are included.文章描述幾乎所有的世界的信仰體系。 Knowing something about what a person presently believes will help you to intelligently comment on their beliefs, and then express the advantages of your belief system.知道是一個怎樣的人，目前認為將有助於您聰明地評論他們的信仰，然後表達你的信念系統的優勢。 This can help develop respect and credibility in you and make YOUR presentation more acceptable.這可以幫助你，尊重和信譽，使您的演示更容易接受。 Often, when Christians witness to others, they overlook why the person currently believes what he/she does, as though it is irrelevant, often because they know very little about that other belief system.通常情況下，當基督徒見證他人，他們忽視了為什麼這個人認為他/她，就好像它是不相關的，往往是因為他們很少知道，其他的信仰體系。 This often comes across as extremely insulting!這常常遇到非常侮辱！ Here's a chance to improve the effect of your witnessing to others, by showing respect for them by intelligently discussing their current beliefs.這裡有一個機會，以改善您看到的效果，對他們的尊重，通過智能化地討論他們目前的信念。

To confirm or deny a questionable comment made by a friend. 要確認或否認的一個朋友有問題的評論。

Sometimes, you hear someone say something religious that just sounds weird!有時候，你聽到有人說什麼宗教，只是聽起來有些不可思議！ Normally, you don't have quick access to reference books to research the topic, or you just don't want to invest hours tracking down such information. BELIEVE probably has useful information on that subject, available in just seconds.通常情況下，你沒有快速查閱參考書籍，以研究主題，或者你只是不想投資小時跟踪這些信息， 相信在這個問題上可能有一些有用的信息，可以在幾秒鐘內。 Knowing this, you might be more likely to 'check it out!'認識到這一點，你可能會更容易檢查出來！“

BELIEVE was first placed on the Internet in the Spring of 1997.相信這是第一次在1997年的春天，在互聯網上。 Since then, there have been an amazing number of visitors to our site!從那時起，已經有數量驚人的遊客到我們的網站！ It seems that most web-sites quickly brag about how much traffic comes to a site.看來，大多數Web站點迅速吹噓多少流量是一個網站。 Considering the content of this site, we feel that would be the wrong attitude.考慮到這個網站的內容，我們認為，這將是錯誤的態度。 Large numbers are essentially irrelevant!大批本質上是無關的！ Our interest is (hopefully!) always in each single visitor, with our efforts being to aid that person to better understand the Lord and religion and Christianity.我們感興趣的是（希望如此）總是在每一個訪問者，用我們的努力，以幫助人更好地了解上帝和宗教和基督教。 If a person is able to get closer to a point of better committing to God (and Jesus), then our efforts are successful! So, as far as we are concerned, we have had ONE visitor, YOU!如果一個人能夠得到更好地致力於神更接近一個點（耶穌），那麼我們的努力是成功的！ 所以，就我們而言，我們已經有一個遊客，你！ And, since you are important to God and Jesus, you are very important to us. We think that's the attitude Jesus would want us to have! 而且，由於你是重要的上帝和耶穌，你是對我們非常重要。我們認為這是耶穌的態度希望我們有！

Also, we realize that you might be interested in knowing more about the organization that created and operates BELIEVE.同時，我們認識到，你可能有興趣知道更多有關的組織和經營BELIEVE。 Our Church, A Christ Walk Church is a relatively normal Protestant Christian Church.我們的教會， 基督步行教會是一個比較正常的基督教新教教會。 Our A Christ Walk Church - Statement of Faith is very similar to that of most Protestant Churches, although it might be more thoroughly presented!我們的基督步行教會-我們的信仰是非常相似的，大部分的新教教會，儘管它可能是更徹底的呈現！ The most noticeable difference between our Church and other Protestant Churches is our special focus on always trying to figure out what Jesus might have said or done in each situation, and then act and speak appropriately.我們的教會和其他基督教之間最明顯的區別是我們總是試圖找出耶穌說了或做在每一種情況，然後採取行動，講適當的特別關注。 Basically, the result of this is that our Church seems to have much less dogma than many other Churches.基本上，這樣做的結果是，我們的教會似乎已經比許多其他教會的教條少得多。 Instead of applying any rigid formulation of response, we believe it is better to understand and respond to each situation of life individually.而不是施加任何硬性的制訂應對，我們相信這是更好地理解和生活的每一種情況分別作出回應。 This statement should make the entire existence of BELIEVE a lot more logical, because it really fits in with the concept.這條語句應該使整個存在的，相信很多更符合邏輯的，因為它真的很適合的概念。 Each visitor is an individual, unlike anyone else.每個遊客為個人的，不像其他人。 It is our belief that if we provide sufficient accurate information, each visitor and his/her indwelling Holy Spirit will then be able to Discern the Truth for that person.我們相信，如果我們提供足夠準確的信息，每名旅客和他/她的留置聖靈將能夠辨別真相的那個人。 We have another presentation which may be of interest, where the basic Meaning of Christianity is presented, as understood by our Church, at What Is Christianity, Anyway? http://mb-soft.com/public2/ourchris.html.我們有另外一個演示文稿，其中可能的利益，基督教的基本含義，理解我們的教會，在什麼是基督教，無論如何？ http://mb-soft.com/public2/ourchris.html。 We have noticed that recently, bumperstickers are beginning to appear with "WWJD" (What Would Jesus Do?) on them.我們已經注意到，最近，bumperstickers開始出現“WWJD”（耶穌會怎麼做？）。 We find that wonderful, very similar to what our Church has always tried to do and Teach.我們發現，美好的，我們的教會一直試圖做的，教非常相似。

We are certainly not perfect, and neither is BELIEVE. In this vein, it probably makes sense for us to admit to a significant 'bias' that we know we have! 當然，我們是不完美的，也相信在這方面，它可能是有道理的，我們不得不承認，我們知道我們有一個顯著的'偏見'！ BELIEVE currently does NOT contain a presentation on "Collection Plate" or "Donation" or "Mammon" because we are not sure we could "fairly" present such a topic.信目前並不包含“收集板”或“捐贈”或“財神”的介紹，因為我們不知道我們可以“公平”目前這樣的一個主題。 We have somewhat unusual attitudes toward that subject!我們有這個問題的態度有點不尋常！

Shortly after the Editor of BELIEVE was Saved (at age 19), he was on vacation and attended a Church in Florida.不久後保存編輯的信（19歲），他是在度假，並出席在佛羅里達州一個教會。 "New" Christians are all especially enthusiastic, and that was true in this case. “新”的基督徒都特別熱情，並且在這種情況下，這是事實。 However, during an hour and a half Service, the Minister passed the Collection Plate FIVE times!然而，在一個半小時​​，服務，部長通過收集板5倍！ They each were for reasonably valid reasons: the normal Collection; a collection to repair the Church parking lot and driveway; a collection for a building project toward having a Sunday School; a collection for a guest Minister; and a collection for a Christian music group that played during the Service.他們每個人都有效的合理的理由：普通的集合的集合，修復教堂的停車場和車道的建設項目向主日學的集合;客人部長的集合;和收集的基督教音樂組發揮在服務。 However, collectively, the experience was offensive to the Editor.然而，共同的經驗是進攻的編輯器。 Without being able to put a finger on exactly what was wrong, it just seemed like something was different from the way Jesus might have wanted it to be.不能夠把一個手指上究竟發生了什麼事，它只是似乎喜歡的東西是不同的，從耶穌可能希望它是。

As a consequence of that experience, the Editor, and BELIEVE, have an intense attitude about keeping religious experience and learning as far as possible from money matters.因此這方面的經驗，編輯，並相信保持宗教的經驗和學習盡可能從錢的問題，有一個強烈的態度。 Clearly, each Church MUST pay mortgages and utility bills and the staff's wages, so money must necessarily be present in the operation of each Church.顯然，每一個教會必須支付抵押貸款和水電費和員工的工資，所以錢必須是在操作的每一個教會。 But we have all seen examples where something has gone wrong and Ministry flies around in personal Learjets and rides around in chauffeured limousines.但我們都看到了一些問題部飛來飛去個人Learjets和遊樂設施，周圍司機的豪華轎車。 I guess our attitude is that we wish that the hour or two that we each share in the Lord's House each week, could be entirely focused on religious ideas, and that people would make their Offerings to their Churches without having to be "prodded" by the existence of a Collection Plate!我猜我們的態度是，我們希望，在小時或兩個，我們每個份額在主的家每個星期，可能會被完全集中在宗教思想，和人們想使自己的產品到他們的教會，而無需到被“打了招呼”的收集板的存在！ But that's not realistic!但是，這並不現實！ We just hope that each Church uses good judgment (and consults their Holy Spirit!) regarding all subjects associated with money, in or out.我們只是希望，每一個教會使用良好的判斷力（諮詢他們的聖靈！）關於與洗錢有關的所有科目，或縮小。

We see this as a pretty significant bias, and so we didn't feel we could fairly present a page on the subject!我們認為這是一個非常顯著的偏差，因此，我們並不認為我們可以公正地提出了關於這個問題的！ There are many reasons why your local Church NEEDS the funds from the Collection, so please be generous to them.原因有很多，為什麼您當地的教會需要的資金集合，所以請慷慨地給他們。

We receive enormous amounts of e-mail, and some of it is critical mail from other Protestant Clergy members.我們收到大量的電子郵件，而有些則是從其他新教神職人員的重要郵件。 In general, such mail attacks us for submitting our visitors to "wolves" ( Matt 7:15; Acts 20:29 ).在一般情況下，此類郵件攻擊我們，為我們的遊客提交的“狼”（ 太7:15;使徒行傳20:29）。 Their position is that we should intensely and exclusively present OUR perspectives and beliefs on the many subjects included in BELIEVE, and we should NOT include "alternate" perspectives at all!他們的立場是，我們應該強烈的和完全的許多科目包括中認為，目前我們的觀點和信念，我們不應該包括在所有的“備用”的觀點！ They believe that we introduce the possibility of confusion in our visitors by presenting various (seemingly credible) approaches on subjects that are centrally important to Faith.他們認為，我們引進的可能性的混亂，我們的遊客提出各種看似可信的方法是至關重要的，以信仰的主題。 They believe that we commit outright sacrilege by openly presenting Catholic and Orthodox and other beliefs!他們認為，我們承諾徹底公開提出天主教和東正教和其他信仰的褻瀆！

Well, they might be right about that, so we cannot defend our actions directly to them!好了，他們可能是對的，所以我們不能捍衛我們的行動直接向他們！ They often also tell us that we are destined for Hell as a result of this aspect of BELIEVE!他們也經常告訴我們，我們注定要下地獄的結果，這方面相信！ We hope that they are wrong about that!我們希望他們錯了！

We also receive a lot of mail applauding us for our "Ecumenical" approach!我們也收到了很多郵件，我們為我們的“合一”的做法鼓掌！

We tend to think that neither is quite accurate, but for an apparently unusual reason!我們傾向於認為，無論是相當準確的，但對於明顯異常的原因！ BELIEVE was created and is presented by our non-Denominational Protestant Christian Church, which is named A Christ Walk Church .相信是創建和我們的非教派的基督教新教，被命名為基督步行教會 。 This appears to be important in this area.這出現在這方面是重要的。 Our Church has a special emphasis on Christian behavior along with all the standard Christian Teachings.我們的教會有一個特殊的重視與所有標準的基督教教義， 基督教的行為 。 We feel that Jesus demonstrated and discussed many "proper behaviors" in addition to the words of His Teachings.我們覺得耶穌證明和討論了很多“正確的行為”的話，他的教義。 As a consequence of this, our Church sees specific importance in the END RESULT of Christian Ministry, basically, the condition of the hearts of those who listen.作為這樣做的結果，我們會看到具體的基督教事工在最終的結果，基本上，條件的心中誰聽。 In our view, virtually the ONLY essential question at the end is "Is your heart Devoutly committed to the Lord?"我們認為，關鍵的問題幾乎是唯一的年底“你的心臟虔誠致力於主嗎？” We believe that that is the single question Jesus would be interested in, at the point someone is at the Gates of Heaven.我們相信，這是耶穌會感興趣的，有人在天堂的門口。單一的問題。 We see that as logical, and our Ministry sees ALL Ministry in that light.我們認為這是合乎邏輯的，我部認為，光在所有部委。 Of course, we want to believe that our methods of Teaching are valid, but we recognize that there might be many other ways a person's heart might be brought to Devotion in the Lord.當然，我們要相信，我們的教學方法是有效的，但我們認識到可能有許多其他方式在主一個人的心可能帶來貢獻。

We have a "quiz" for you!我們有一個“測驗”為你！ Virtually all Christians confidently feel that they are "IN" once they are Saved.幾乎所有的基督徒都自信地認為，他們是“IN”一旦它們被保存。 We think that some may be being "optimistic" about this!我們認為，有些可能是“樂觀”！ Try this: As a mental exercise, in private, list TEN times when you have let the Lord down!試試這個：作為一個精神運動，在私營機構，名單十倍，當你讓主！ Many Christians laugh at this, commenting that they fall short thousands of times, but this exercise is more challenging than you might think.許多基督徒的笑，評論屬於短幾千倍，但這項工作是比你想像的更具挑戰性的。 Just remember that you are considering the Lord, so consider your "standards".請記住，你正在考慮主，所以考慮你的“標準”。

A person might THINK that he/she is devout, but without an awareness of the many times we humans fall short, there seems the likelihood of a non-Christian arrogance.一個人可能會認為他/她是虔誠的，但沒有我們人類功虧一簣了很多次的意識，似乎有一個非基督徒的傲慢的可能性。 We think that awareness of a personal list of ten examples of shortcomings would confirm the status of that person's heart.我們認為，認識的一個新的列表，十個例子的缺點，將確認狀態，人的心。 The 'scale' of those incidents would likely vary greatly from individual to individual, and it would remain a private matter between that person and the Lord.的'規模'這些事件可能會相差很大，從個人到個人，它仍然是一個私人之間的事，人，主。

The point of this exercise is that if you manage to think of ten different specific times you let the Lord down, you're probably on the right track.這次演習的一點是，如果你能夠想到的10個不同的具體時間，你讓主下來，你可能在正確的軌道上。 If you cannot think of any, or struggle to think of a couple, you might want to consider putting more effort into your Faith!如果你能想到的任何，或掙扎的一對夫婦想，你可能要考慮把更多的精力放在你的信仰！

We see two major problems in that situation.在這種情況下，我們看到了兩個主要問題。 First, it seems to imply that Jesus is rather "legalistic" in who is allowed into Heaven, and we know from when He was with us that He was violently against the Jews for being legalistic in applying the "Law" of the Old Testament (example: Luke 13:14 ).首先，它似乎暗示耶穌是誰被允許進入天堂，而不是“墨守成規”，而我們知道的時候，他跟我們說，他被粗暴地反對猶太人的應用“舊約”的“法”是墨守成規的（例如： 路加福音13:14）。 Second, and, we think, even more importantly, is another implication regarding Jesus.第二，我們認為，更重要的，是另一個關於耶穌的含義。 We all believe that Jesus IS Love and Compassion, essentially the very definition of the words!我們都相信耶穌是愛和慈悲，本質上定義的話！ So, our Church, with its special focus on behavioral issues, asks "Would a Compassionate Jesus participate in a Heaven where extremely Devout people who spent a lifetime committed to Him would be denied entry to Heaven?"因此，我們的教會，其行為問題的特別關注，問：“是一個仁慈的耶穌會參加一個非常虔誠的人，花了一生的承諾他將被拒絕進入天堂的天堂嗎？” Our emphatic response is that He wouldn't and couldn't.我們強調的回應是，他也不可能。

Yes, we Teach the Two Protestant Sacraments, Baptism and the Eucharist, and we Teach that Good Works spring FROM Christian Faith rather than being necessary to it, and we Baptize and have the other common beliefs of many Protestant Churches.是的，我們教新教聖禮，洗禮和聖體聖事，我們教的優秀作品從春天基督教信仰，而不是必要的，我們施洗，並有其他許多新教教會的共同信念。 But we think it would be very arrogant (therefore, non-Christian) to claim that WE alone knew how to prepare individuals for the Presence of the Lord.但是，我們認為這將是非常傲慢的（因此，非基督教的），聲稱只有我們知道如何準備個人存在的主。 Therefore, we openly applaud ALL Churches that attempt to prepare the hearts of their followers for profound Devotion to the Lord, even when they follow methods which we might not agree with.因此，我們公開讚揚所有的教會嘗試準備進行深刻的奉獻給主，即使他們遵循的方法，我們可能不同意他們的追隨者的心。

We do not have ANY good explanation as to how the Lord deals with this diversity in Heaven, only that, because of His Compassion, He does!主如何處理這種多樣性在天堂，我們沒有什麼好解釋的，不僅如此，因為他的慈悲，他做的！ So, a Devout Catholic, who was Taught a central importance in doing Good Works as a condition for Salvation (which we Protestants think is very wrong!) would still be welcomed with a Smile into Heaven, whether or not we understand why!因此，一個虔誠的天主教徒，誰教了中央的重視行善的條件救世軍（我們新教徒認為是非常錯誤的！）仍然會受到歡迎，面帶微笑進入天堂，我們是否明白，為什麼！ Any other result would seem to imply a Lord whose Compassion is not what we want to believe it is.任何其他結果似乎暗示著主的慈悲是不是我們想要相信它是。

Our conclusion from all this is that, prior to committing one's life to the Lord, a person may freely visit various Houses of Worship.從所有這一切，我們得出的結論是，之前犯一個人的生命的主，一個人可以自由地訪問各種宗教場所。 Consider the deeper meaning of Baptism.考慮更深層次的含義的洗禮。 Who did you intend to affect by being Baptized?誰是你打算受洗的影響？ We hope it was not for friends or family or a Church leadership.我們希望這不是為朋友或家人或教會的領導。 Our hope is that you (possibly even privately) became Saved (actually, we see that as being Baptized by the Spirit), committed to the Lord, and then were publicly (water) Baptized for only one purpose: To tell the Lord, "I am Yours, and I will forever demonstrate my Devotion TO YOU by strictly following the Rites and beliefs of THIS (your) Church."我們的希望是，（可能甚至私下）得救（實際上，我們認為這是聖靈的洗禮），致力於主，然後公開（水）受洗，目的只有一個：告訴主，“我是你，我會永遠證明我奉獻給你嚴格按照（你的）教會的儀式和信仰。“ As of that moment, each believer has the strict responsibility to follow THAT Church.的那一刻，每一個信徒遵循教會的嚴格責任。 You have essentially told the Lord "Judge me by THIS standard."本質上講，你已經告訴主“法官，我按照這樣的標準。” There is NO leeway.沒有任何迴旋餘地。 No room for interpretation on your part!無房為您解讀！ If you happened to have chosen a Church that requires you to ask "How high?"如果你碰巧選擇了一個教會，需要你來問：“有多高？” when it tells you to jump, then you MUST, not for the Church, but to keep demonstrating to the Lord your total Obedience to Him.它會告訴你跳，那麼你必須，不是為了教會，而是要展示給耶和華你們的完全服從他。 Just because a Church down the block does not require jumping, you have NO room to complain, and just better get good at jumping!正因為這個街區的一所教堂，不需要跳躍，你有沒有抱怨的空間，只有更好善於跳躍！ Your Personal Promise to the Lord is on the line!你的個人承諾向主就行了！

From the moment you are Baptized, IN A SPECIFIC CHURCH, then ONLY that Church's Christian Rites and beliefs have real meaning for you.的那一刻起，你的洗禮，在一個特定的教會，然後教會的基督教儀式和信仰對你有實際意義。 Hopefully, your Church has valid beliefs and Rites.希望，你的教會有有效的信仰和儀式。 Beliefs and procedures in some other Church may be VERY different, and they may even seem incompatible with what you must follow.在其他一些教會的信仰和程序可能是非常不同的，他們甚至可能似乎不符合你必須遵循。 FOR YOU, it is irrelevant what the Christians in those other Churches must do. However, you should encourage them to be very Devout in their following of their own Church's Rites and beliefs. At the moment they were Baptized in those Churches, they made their own solemn Promise to the Lord to forever demonstrate their Faith to Him.對你來說，它是不相關的什麼在那些其他教會的基督徒必須做。 但是，你應該鼓勵他們到是很虔誠的在他們的下面他們自己的教會的儀式和信仰。目前，他們被受洗，在這些教堂中，他們取得他們的主自己的莊嚴承諾永遠向他展示他們的信仰。 (The exception to this are clearly aberrant groups that claim to be Churches.) （例外，這顯然是異常的團體，聲稱是教會）。

Some people have expressed concern about this regarding what would happen if they move or otherwise decide to attend a different Church, that these comments might seem to suggest that Salvation or Baptism would no longer have effect!有些人表示，這對於會發生什麼，如果它們移動或以其他方式決定參加一個不同的教會，這些評論似乎表明，拯救或的洗禮將不再有效果的關注！ No, that is not the concept we tried to describe here!不，那是沒有這個概念，我們試圖描述這裡！ We believe that in those situations, a simple and private conversation with the Lord would inform Him that you now wish to be evaluated by the new set of rules and behaviors of the new Church.我們相信，在這些情況下，一個簡單的和私人的談話與主會告訴他，你現在想進行評估的一套新的規則和行為的新教堂。

We might have another possible analogy to use here.我們可能有另一種可能的比喻用在這裡。 When one gets married, one makes certainly commitments to another person, and we even then say "forever".當一個人結婚，一個人到另一個人的肯定承諾，我們甚至說“永遠”。 However, there are some individuals that either immediately or later start thinking and behaving as though they had never made such a commitment, that they are somehow free to be "making up their own rules" to follow.不過，也有一些個人，可以立即或以後開始思考和行為，雖然他們從來沒有作出這樣的承諾，他們已經在某種程度上可以自由地“讓自己的規則”遵循。 That is clearly unacceptable.這顯然是不可接受的。 We feel that it is critically important that a person not have the freedom to "decide what rules must be followed regarding the Lord."我們覺得這是非常重要的，一個人沒有自由“決定什麼樣的規則必須遵循主。” So we insist that the existing set of rules regarding behaviors and attitudes of an existing Church be followed instead.因此，我們堅持認為，應遵循現有的一套規則，對現有的教會的行為和態度，而不是。

So, that is our concept, and our ONLY defense to those attackers who criticize us for being in league with the wolves!所以，這是我們的理念，我們唯一的防禦那些批評我們的人在聯賽與狼的攻擊者！ Many have directly implied that we might as well buy shovels now, as we will spend Eternity stoking the furnaces in Hell!很多人直接指出，我們還不如買鏟子現在，我們將花費永恆煽動在地獄的熔爐！ And, again, we have no absolute way of knowing or proving that they are wrong, except our Faith in what WE believe the Lord to be, and that He IS Love and Compassion. ，再次，我們沒有絕對的方法，明知或證明他們是錯的，但我們的信念，我們相信主，他是愛與慈悲。

These few paragraphs might sound like a "commercial" on our part.這幾個段落聽起來像我們的“商業化”。 They are not intended as such.他們不能被用於這樣的。 But, we have received a number of such criticisms, and felt it necessary to allow readers to know both about the criticisms and our reasons for BELIEVE being the very "open" form that it is.但是，我們已經收到了一些這樣的批評，並認為有必要讓讀者知道的批評和我們的原因，相信是很“開放”的形式，它是。 In the event that this represents a 'bias' we felt you should know about it!的事件，這是一個“偏見”我們覺得你應該知道這件事！

One final comment about the "confusion" we might be causing and / or the "wolves" business: Another central belief of our Church is that the Holy Spirit is RIGHT THERE with EVERY visitor to BELIEVE, whether Christian, Seeker, or skeptic.發表的“混亂”我們可能會引起和/或“狼”的另一個核心業務：我們教會的信仰是最後一個，聖靈就在那裡，相信每一位來訪者，不論是否基督徒，導引頭，或持懷疑態度。 Our belief is that that Holy Spirit will give guidance to each individual visitor, regarding the discernment of Truth.我們的信念是，聖靈引導到每一個人遊客，關於真理的法眼。 Therefore, we believe that, when we present various Christian scholars' broadly accepted views on our many subjects, the Holy Spirit will lead each visitor in finding the "correct" one for that person.因此，我們相信，當我們提出各種基督教學者廣泛接受的觀點，我們的許多學科，聖靈會導致每個遊客尋找“正確”的那個人。 This is why we don't have reservations about presenting positions that our Church happens to not agree with, and why we feel we can present such views fairly and honestly.這就是為什麼我們沒有持保留態度發生，我們的教會不同意，為什麼我們覺得我們可以提出這樣的意見，公平及誠實的展示位置。 And, as a responsibility to Jesus, we feel we are REQUIRED to do so!而且，作為一種責任，以耶穌，我們覺得我們必須這樣做！

So, if you should find anything in BELIEVE that appears to disagree with the Teachings of your Church, we recommend relying on those Teachings first, but possibly asking informed questions at the right time and in the right place.所以，如果你發現任何認為似乎不同意你的教會的教導，我們建議靠這些教導第一，但也可能要求知情的問題，在正確的時間在正確的地方。 They probably have EXCELLENT reasons for their beliefs and Teachings!他們可能有充分的理由為自己的信仰和教義！

Now, whether our approach represents an "Ecumenical" perspective, we do not know.現在，我們的做法是否代表了“合一”的角度來看，我們不知道。 The result is similar, of a tolerance and acceptance of other Churches, but we see it as being for a rather different reason than most Ecumenical efforts are initiated.其結果是相似的，一個容忍和接受其他教會，但我們把它看作是一個比最普世的努力開始的，而不同的原因。 And we don't see need for "conformance" to some common set of beliefs, but rather a recognition that the Lord Smiles on ALL of the diversity of Christian approaches.同時，我們也需要一些共同的信念“一致性”，而是一種認識，即主笑道所有的基督教方法的多樣性。 We acknowledge that God's Plan for us is far beyond our capability to completely understand.我們承認上帝對我們的計劃是遠遠超出了我們的能力完全理解。

Our impression is that Churches generally concentrate on the specific "means" toward becoming a Christian and we tend to concentrate more on the "end" of actually BEING a Devout Christian.我們的感覺是，教會一般集中於特定的“的意思是”朝著成為一個基督徒，我們往往更專注於“結束”實際上是一個虔誠的基督徒。 We don't see that it means we disagree, but just that we do not see cause to argue among Churches in how they each accomplish it!我們並不認為這意味著我們不同意，但只是我們沒有看到教會之間的爭論，他們每個人是如何完成它的事業！ Actually, we tend to see value in WHATEVER a Church feels it needs to do to prepare the hearts of its Congregation members, so we are actually a fan of (nearly) all of them!其實，我們往往看到，在任何一個教會認為它需要做的準備眾成員的心，所以，我們其實是一個球迷的（幾乎）所有的人！

You probably consider yourself to be one of the "children of God", don't you?你可能認為自己是“神的兒女”，不你嗎？ More than that, a child of the One, True God, Whom Abraham worshipped and Who communicated with Moses to provide us with what we commonly call the Ten Commandments?更重要的是，一個孩子的，真實的上帝，亞伯拉罕崇拜和誰溝通與摩西向我們提供我們通常所說的十誡嗎？ There are a LOT of people who would make those statements!有很多的人誰使這些報表！ Protestant Christians carefully study the Bible (Old Testament and New Testament) to learn how to Worship Him.該基督教徒仔細研讀“聖經”（舊約和新約），以了解如何崇拜他。 Catholic Christians use a combination of the Bible and Traditions to do the same.天主教教徒使用的“聖經”和傳統相結合，做同樣的。 Jews use only the Old Testament, which they call the Torah, in order to know how to Worship God.猶太人只使用舊約，他們的律法，為了知道如何來敬拜神。 Muslims use a combination of part of that same Old Testament, which they call Taurah, along with their Koran, to learn how to Worship the very same God, Whom they call Allah.穆斯林使用相同的舊約，他們稱之為Taurah，隨著他們的可蘭經“，學習如何崇拜同一個神，他們的真主的組合的一部分。 All of these people consider themselves to be "children of God", the One God of Abraham.所有這些人都認為自己是“神的兒女”，一神，就是亞伯拉罕。 Interesting?有趣嗎？ Yet many of these children of God absolutely insist that the others are all Devil worshippers and therefore sinful!然而，許多這些神的兒女，絕對堅持，其他人都是魔鬼崇拜者，因此有罪！ Many Christians, who actually know virtually zilch regarding what Muslims believe, get ferociously vicious at ME for pointing out that Jesus, the Father, Jehovah, YHWH, Allah and many other Names ALL refer to the One True God Whom Abraham first Worshipped.許多基督徒，他們根本不知道幾乎的擲骰子關於穆斯林相信什麼，得到兇猛邪惡的在ME指出的是，耶穌的父親，耶和華，耶和華，阿拉和很多其他的名字都是指獨一的真神亞伯拉罕第一信仰崇拜。 They never have enough background to explain WHY or HOW the God of Abraham who WE Worship is somehow exactly opposite of the God of Abraham that Muslims worship many times every day!他們從來沒有解釋為什麼或如何亞伯拉罕的神，我們崇拜誰是亞伯拉罕的神，不知何故正好相反，穆斯林所崇拜的許多倍，每天有足夠的背景知識！

Actually, we suspect that many Christians will be amazed to find that Muslims' Holy Koran tells the stories of Adam and Abraham and Israel and Moses and many others on whom our Faith is based.其實，我們懷疑會驚訝地發現，許多基督徒，穆斯林的“古蘭經”告訴我們的信仰是基於亞當，亞伯拉罕和以色列的摩西的故事，和許多其他的。 It seems that few Christians realize that their Allah is One and the Same God as Who the Jews call YHWH (Yahweh, or Jehovah) and Whom we Christians call Father.這似乎是少數的基督徒認識到，他們的真主是同一個神，誰的猶太人稱為耶和華（耶和華，耶和華），我們基督徒稱父親。 Certainly, their stories have differences from our Bible, but the many similarities are something to consider!當然，他們的故事從我們的聖經​​有差異，但有許多相似之處，要考慮的事情！ Again, we know that Jesus would be absolutely confident that Christians would not have their Faith weakened by learning about such things, but it might assist all of us to learn to get along better together.同樣，我們知道耶穌是基督徒絕對的信心，削弱了學習這樣的事情不會有他們的信仰，但它可能會幫助我們學習更好地相處在一起。

Actually, we note that God originally forbade anyone to even say His Name!事實上，我們注意到，神最初禁止任何人，甚至說他的名字！ It would probably be extremely healthy if we did that today.它可能是非常健康的，如果我們這樣做，今天。 A Christian would then say that he/she Worships "the One, True God of Abraham, Moses and Adam."一個基督徒會說他/她崇拜“的一個，真正的上帝的亞伯拉罕，摩西和亞當。” Which is EXACTLY the same thing that Jews and Muslims would say!這正是同樣的事情，猶太人和穆斯林會說！ The later appearance of that One True God walking the Earth as Jesus, tends to cause massive confusion, both in many Christians and in most non-Christians.後來的外觀，獨一真神步行地球耶穌，往往會造成巨大的混亂，在許多基督徒和非基督徒。 Many Christians are so focused on Jesus that they forget that the First Commandment made very clear that there is actually One True God, which Jesus therefore has to also be!專注於基督耶穌，他們忘記了第一誡說得很清楚，其實是一個真正的上帝，耶穌因此也被許多基督徒！ Non-Christians (Jews and Muslims) are more focused on Moses' Ten Commandments and therefore concentrate on the "One True God" aspect and think that Christians are Worshipping "somebody else" and therefore, very properly, find error in that as seeming to conflict with the First Commandment.非基督徒（猶太人和穆斯林）更側重於摩西的十誡，因此集中在“一真神”方面認為，基督徒崇拜“別人”，因此，非常恰當，在這看起來象是發現錯誤第一誡衝突。

On this point, the Koran and Islam hold Jesus in very high esteem, considering Him a Prophet, and even expecting Him to some day Return!在這一點上，“可蘭經”和伊斯蘭教舉行耶穌在非常高的評價，認為他的先​​知，甚至期待他有一天回到！ It is our suspicion that Muhammad (the initiator of Islam) misunderstood the Christian concept of the Trinity.是我們的懷疑，穆罕默德（伊斯蘭教引發的）誤解了基督教的三位一體的概念。 At several places in their Koran, there are statements that clearly indicate that Muhammad thought that Christians considered Jesus to be a SECOND God, and Muhammad aggressively defended the First Commandment statement that there is One True God (which all Muslims repeat at least five times every single day).在一些地方，在他們的可蘭經“，聲明清楚地表明， 穆罕默德認為基督徒認為耶穌是第二個神，穆罕默德積極地捍衛了第一誡聲明，指出存在的真神 （所有的穆斯林都重複5次，每次至少單天）。 It is our suspicion that if Muhammad had fully understood the concept of the Trinity (One God), he would have realized that the One True God had Chosen to walk the earth six hundred years earlier as Jesus!這是我們的懷疑，如果穆罕默德已經完全明白三位一體的概念（一神），他會意識到，一個真正的上帝選擇了走地球600年為耶穌！ With that adjustment, Christianity and Islam become surprisingly similar in basic beliefs!調整，基督教和伊斯蘭教的基本信念成為驚人的相似！

Their belief system seems to have a number of errors in it regarding Christianity, such as the impression that the Christian Trinity is Father, Jesus, and the Virgin Mary!他們的信仰體系似乎有許多關於基督教的錯誤，如基督教的三位一體是父親，耶穌和聖母的印象！ (Koran Sura 5.116) This is interesting, since Muslims believe that every word of the Koran is precisely accurate because it came directly from God (Allah) to Muhammad. （古蘭經蘇拉5.116）這是一個有趣的，因為穆斯林認為“古蘭經”的每一個字，恰恰是準確的，因為它直接來自於上帝（真主），以穆罕默德。 Our point is that it is not nearly as "foreign" as many people think.我們的觀點是，它是幾乎沒有“洋”許多人認為。

While we're on this tangent, we'd like to ask Christian readers why Muslims insist on facing Mecca for all their prayers!雖然我們在此切線，我們要問為什麼穆斯林，基督徒讀者堅持面對麥加他們的祈禱！ Do you know?你知道嗎？ It's because of a single thing, a building in Mecca, called the Kaaba.這是因為一個單一的東西，在麥加天房建設。 Muslims believe that Abraham (yup, OUR Abraham!) built the Kaaba, and they recognize Abraham as being the very first "true" believer, because he was willing to sacrifice his own son for the Lord.穆斯林認為亞伯拉罕（是的，我們的亞伯拉罕！）建立了克爾白，他們認識亞伯拉罕的第一個“真正”的信徒，因為他願意犧牲自己的兒子為主。 We find that interesting!我們發現很有趣！ Each person is free to interpret such things however they wish!每個人解釋這樣的事情，但是他們希望是免費的！

If this interests you, we have created a small presentation which is absolutely compatible with all Christian beliefs and is also completely compatible with all Muslim beliefs.如果你對此感興趣，我們創建了一個小型的演示，這是絕對兼容所有的基督教信仰，也是完全兼容所有穆斯林的信仰。 It is at: Compatibility .這是： 兼容性 。

Obviously, these comments do not include the militant terrorist Muslims, who have grave errors in their understanding of their own Islam.很顯然，這些評論並不包括軍事恐怖，有嚴重的錯誤，他們了解自己的伊斯蘭教的穆斯林。 They don't seem to be aware of the surprisingly peaceful tone of what Islam actually tries to teach.他們似乎並不知道出奇的平和的語調伊斯蘭教實際上是嘗試教。 They seem to ignore the many times where their Koran emphasizes brotherhood with Jews and Christians, as brother "believers of the Book (the Torah, the first five Books of the Bible)".他們似乎忽略了很多次，他們的可蘭經“強調兄弟情誼與猶太人和基督徒，因為兄弟”的信徒圖書（律法，第一個五年書籍的聖經）“。 It is very sad that the vast majority of peace-loving Muslims are painted to seem so evil by the actions of a small number of extremely dangerous people.這是很可悲的是，絕大多數愛好和平的穆斯林畫顯得如此邪惡的少數極其危險的人的行動。 It is certainly true that we think that Muslims have many incorrect ideas and beliefs, particularly regarding Jesus, Mary and Christians.這是千真萬確的，我們認為，穆斯林有許多不正確的思想和信仰，特別是關於耶穌，瑪利亞和基督徒。 But it is interesting to note the many similarities, too.但有趣的是要注意的，也有許多相似之處。

Information about the Editor of BELIEVE.信息的編輯器的相信。

This BELIEVE Home Page address is at: http://mb-soft.com/believe/beliecht.html此信的主頁地址是：http://mb-soft.com/believe/beliecht.html

Christian subjects基督教科目

4,000 Early Christian Manuscripts 4000早期基督教手稿
Bible 聖經
Spiritual Gifts 屬靈的恩賜
Salvation 救恩
God 神
Arguments for 為參數
Existence of God 神的存在性
Names of God 神的名稱
Baptism 洗禮
Biblical Inerrancy 聖經無誤
Jesus Christ 耶穌基督的
Christ 基督
Crucifixion 受難
the Crucifix 十字架
Chronology of 年表
Jesus' Life 耶穌的生命
Prophecies that 預言，
Jesus Fulfilled 耶穌履行
Holy Spirit 聖靈
Ten Commandments 十十誡
Trinity 三位一體
Covenant “公約”
History of the Bible “聖經”的歷史
NT references 新台幣引用
to OT Scriptures 舊約聖經
Seven Words 7個字
on the Cross 在十字架上
Beatitudes of Christ 八福基督
The Four 四
Spiritual Laws 精神的法律
Faith 信仰
Grace 恩典
Sin 罪
Atonement 贖罪
Lord's Prayer 主禱文
Lord's Supper 主的晚餐
Eucharist 聖餐
Holy Communion 聖餐
Infallibility 犯錯誤
Original Sin 原罪
Christology 基督
Resurrection 復活
Translations 翻譯
of the Bible “聖經”
Covenant of Works 工程盟約“
Covenant of Grace “公約”的雍容
Eschatology 末世論
Conscience 良心
Glory, Glorify 榮耀，榮耀
Good Works 優秀作品
Inspiration 靈感
Holiness 法王
Litany 禱文
Liturgy 禮儀
Prayer 祈禱
Providence 普羅維登斯
Punishment 處罰
Reconciliation 和解
Christian 基督教
(practical definition) （實際的定義）
chart of 圖表
Denominations 面額
Religion 宗教
Repentance 悔改
Sacrifice 犧牲
Temptation 誘惑
Conversion 轉換
Christian 基督教
music history 音樂史
Church 教會
Freedom 自由
Free Will 自由意志
Determinism 確定性
Imminence 迫在眉睫
Justification 理由
Messiah 彌賽亞
Millenarianism 千福年說
Millennialism Millennialism
Premillennialism Premillennialism
Postmillennialism Postmillennialism
Amillennialism Amillennialism
Sanctification 聖化
Evangelism 使團
Second Coming 第二次來臨
of Christ 基督
Pre-existence 前生
of Christ 基督
Logos 徽標
Last Judgment 最後的審判
Historical 歷史
Controversy 爭議
Over Sin 勝過罪惡
Elect 選舉
Election 選舉
Last Supper 最後的晚餐
Christianity 基督教
and science 和科學
Genesis and science Genesis和科學
Book of Genesis 預訂的成因
Book of Exodus 預訂出埃及記
Incarnation 化身
Dualism 二元論
Romanized 羅馬
Bible Text 聖經經文
Jehovah 耶和華
JEHOVAH 耶和華
YHWH 耶和華
Literal Translation 直譯
Translating 翻譯
the Bible “聖經”
Adam 亞當
Predestination 宿命
Double 雙
Predestination 宿命
Priesthood of All Believers 聖職的所有信徒
Revivalism 復興傾向
Bless, Blessings 祝福，祝福
Sabbath 安息日
Sabbatarianism Sabbatarianism
Biblical Inerrancy 聖經無誤
Events in Jesus' Life 耶穌的生命活動
Sacrament 聖餐
Sanctuary 避難所
Satan 撒但
Spiritualism 招魂
Theism 有神論

Dispensation 省卻
Dispensationalism Dispensationalism
Divine Immanence 神聖的內在
Infralapsarianism Infralapsarianism
Supralapsarianism Supralapsarianism
Traducianism Traducianism
Transcendentalism 先驗論
Transubstantiation 陷於變體
Consubstantiation Consubstantiation
Dispensationalism Dispensationalism
Ultradis- Ultradis -
pensationalism pensationalism
Progressive 逐步
Revelation 啟示

Christianity 基督教
Protestantism 新教
Roman Catholic 羅馬天主教
Church 教會
Evangelicalism 福音
Charismatic 魅力
Movement 運動
Biblical infallibility 聖經犯錯誤
Congregationalism 公理
Fundamentalism 原教旨主義
Church government 教會政府
Denominationalism 宗派
Authority in Church 在教會的權力
Biblical Theology 聖經神學
Movement 運動
The Church 教會
Pentecostalism 五旬節
Presbyterianism 長老會制

Anglo-Catholicism 盎格魯-天主教
Liberal Catholicism 自由天主教
Old Catholics 老天主教徒
Religious Orders 宗教命令
Jesuits 耶穌會士
Society of Jesus 耶穌會
Franciscans 方濟會
OFM OFM
Carmelites 加爾默羅
Discalced Discalced
Carmelites 加爾默羅
Benedictines 本篤
Order of 訂購
St. Benedict 聖本篤
OSB OSB
Bollandists Bollandists
Cistercians 熙
Trappists Trappists
Dominicans 多米尼加
OFP OFP
Christian Brothers 基督教兄弟
Friars 天主教方濟會
Augustinian Friars 奧古斯丁天主教方濟會
Friars Minor 方濟會
Friars Preachers 天主教方濟會傳教士
Black Friars 黑方濟各會士
Gray Friars 灰色方濟各會士
White Friars 白方濟各會士
Eastern Rite 東部成年禮
Catholic Church 天主教
Eastern Rite 東部成年禮
Church 教會
Episcopal Church 聖公會
Anglican Communion 聖公會
Orthodox Church 東正教
Coptic Church 科普特教會
Eastern 東區
Orthodox Church 東正教
Oriental 東方
Orthodox Church 東正教

Protestantism 新教
Baptists 浸信會
Brethren 弟兄
Calvinism 加爾文主義
Wesleyan Tradition 衛斯理傳統
Methodism 理宗
Lutheranism 路德教
Reformed Church 歸正
Adventism 复臨
Amana Society 阿馬納協會
EUB EUB
Evangelical United 福音美國
Brethren Church 弟兄教會
Evangelism 使團
FourSquare 四方
Gospel Church 福音教會
Aimee Semple 艾梅森普爾
McPherson 麥克弗森
American Holiness 美國聖潔
Movement 運動
Hutterian Brethren Hutterian弟兄
Landmarkism Landmarkism
Liberal 自由
Evangelicalism 福音
Mennonite 門諾
Millenarianism 千福年說
Church of the 教堂
Nazarene 拿撒勒
Churches of Christ 教會的基督
Christian Science 基督教科學
Christian Church / 基督教會/
Churches of Christ 教會的基督
Christadelphian 基督弟兄
Neo-Orthodoxy 新正統派
Society of Friends 之友協會
Quakers 貴格會
Salvation Army 救世軍
Volunteers 志願者
of America 美國
Shepherding 牧養
Movement 運動
Discipleship 門徒
Movement 運動
Robert Schuller 羅伯特舒勒
Hour of Power 小時電力
Crystal Cathedral 水晶大教堂
The Way 的方式
International 國際
United Church 美國教會
of Christ 基督
Plymouth Brethren 普利茅斯教友
Disciples of Christ 弟子基督
Scottish Realism 蘇格蘭現實主義
Shakers 搖床
Worldwide 全球
Church of God 神的教會
Armstrongism Armstrongism
Ascetical Theology 苦修神學

Jehovah's Witnesses 耶和華見證會
Sect 教派
Sectarianism 宗派主義
Religious Cults 邪教
Christian Zionism 基督教猶太复國主義
Moravian Church 摩拉維亞教會
Mormon 摩門教
Mormonism 摩門教
Latter-Day Saints 後期聖徒
Mormon Beliefs 摩門教的信仰
Mysticism 神秘主義
Naturalism 自然主義
Spiritualism 招魂
Swedenborgian Swedenborgian
Church 教會
Unitarianism 一神論
Universalism 普遍性
Zionism 猶太复國主義
British Israelitism 英國Israelitism

Septuagint 譯本
LXX LXX
Apocrypha 偽經
Early Canon of 早期佳能
the New Testament 新約
Canon of the Bible 佳能“聖經”
Canon of the 佳能的
Old Testament 舊約
Canon of the 佳能的
New Testament 新約全書
Papacy 羅馬教皇
Paulinism Paulinism
Pentecost 聖靈降臨節
Adoptionism Adoptionism
Antiochene 安提阿學派
Theology 神學
Council of Nicaea, Nicæa 尼西亞，尼西亞理事會
Pseudepigrapha Pseudepigrapha
Pharisees 法利賽人
Essenes 愛色尼
Sadducees 撒都該人
Advanced Info: 先進的信息：
Pharisees, 法利賽人，
Sadducees, Essenes 撒都該人，愛色尼
Great Schism 大分裂
Roman Catholic 羅馬天主教
Popes 教皇
Marrow Controversy 骨髓爭議
Gospel of Matthew 馬太福音
Gospel of Mark 福音馬克
Gospel of Luke 福音的盧克
Gospel of John 福音約翰

Protestant 新教
Reformation 宗教改革
Martin Luther 馬丁-路德
Luther's 路德
Small Catechism 小問答
John Calvin 約翰加爾文
Ulrich Zwingli 烏爾里希茨溫利
John Wesley 約翰衛斯理
Menno Simons 門諾西門子

Solafidianism Solafidianism
By Faith Alone 唯獨因著信
Counter- 反
Reformation 宗教改革
Radical 激進
Reformation 宗教改革
Anabaptist 再洗禮派
Arminianism 亞米紐斯主義
39 articles 39文章
Thirty-Nine Articles 第三九條
Reformation and 改革和
Confessions 自白
Pelagianism 伯拉糾主義
Semi-Pelagianism 半，伯拉糾主義
Crypto-Calvinism 加密的加爾文
Marburg Colloquy 馬爾堡討論會
Pilgrims 朝聖者
Adiaphora Adiaphora
Adiaphorist Adiaphorist
Believer's Baptism 信徒的洗禮
Infant Baptism 嬰兒洗禮
Lay Baptism 萊洗禮
Modes of Baptism 洗禮模式
Trine Baptism 特里尼洗禮
Triune Baptism 三位一體的洗禮
Baptism of Jesus 耶穌的洗禮
Baptism of John 約翰的洗禮
Docetism Docetism
Jansenism 詹森
Melchiorites Melchiorites
Monophysitism 基督一
Monothelitism Monothelitism
Montanism 孟他努
Nestorianism 景教
On the Cross 在十字架上
Panentheism Panentheism
Pantheism 泛神論
Pietism 虔誠主義
Priscillian 普里西利安
Priscillianism Priscillianism
Puritan 清教徒
Puritanism 清教
Modalism Modalism
Patripassianism Patripassianism
Sabellianism Sabellianism
Scholasticism 墨守成規
Ultramontanism Ultramontanism
New England 新英格蘭
Theology 神學
New Haven 紐黑文
Theology 神學
New Light Schism 新的光分裂
New School 新學校
Theology 神學
Novation Schism 更替分裂
Oberlin Theology 奧伯林神學
Old School 舊派
Theology 神學
Orthodoxy 正統
Plainsong Plainsong
Erastianism Erastianism
Mercersburg Mercersburg
Theology 神學
Oxford Movement 牛津運動
Perfection 完美
Perfectionism 完美主義
Philosophy 哲學
of Religion 宗教
Realism 現實主義
Protestant 新教
Scholasticism 墨守成規
Socinianism Socinianism
Subordinationism Subordinationism
Eutychianism Eutychianism
Syncretism 合一
Synergism 協同作用
Terminism Terminism
Thomism 托馬斯主義
Divine 神聖的
Transcendence 超越
Tubingen School 蒂賓根學校
Nat'l Conf of Nat'l CONF的
Christians and Jews 基督徒和猶太人
Utopianism 烏托邦
Effectual Calling 行之有效的呼喚

Christian Bible 基督教聖經

Septuagint 譯本
LXX LXX
Targum 他爾根
Vulgate 武加大
Versions of the Bible 版本的“聖經”
Codex Vaticanus 食品法典委員會Vaticanus
Codex Sinaiticus 食品法典西奈抄本
Codex, Codices 食品法典委員會，抄本
Harmony of 和諧的
the Gospels 福音書
Bereshit - Jewish Genesis (advanced) Bereshit -猶太創世記（先進）