Apparent Discrepancies in the Bible
- If one is to take the words in the Bible literally,
how do we explain this?
Genesis 4:16 And Cain went out from the presence of the Lord, and
dwelt in the land of Nod, on the East of Eden.
Genesis 4:17 And Cain knew his wife; -- -- --.
This seems to imply that there were OTHER humans in existence,
other than Adam and Eve and their children! That seems to
challenge the notion of Adam and Eve being the "first"
- My Answer:
- God just didn't see the need to bother with including a lot of details
like that, because, until this past hundred years or so, people were just
never concerned about the technical logic of a thousand such things in the
Bible. I do not claim that He provided us with all the information to
provide conclusive answers to all the millions of questions we can
collectively come up with! But I DO claim that He created a Universe where
"logical" answers are possible for such questions. It appears that none of
us are yet smart enough to figure out the logic behind most of them!
My suspicion is that, on our Welcome into Heaven, in the event that we still
have all those sorts of questions, when the answers will be provided, we will
probably think "Wow! That's obvious!" even though we don't have a clue on
most of them now!
If you consider the "scientific" side of the concept, the answer is certainly
obvious. But I agree that something seems illogical in those Scriptures. I
don't have the slightest doubt in the Scriptures (especially as they were
ORIGINALLY written). That means to me that there MUST be a logical
explanation that exists. Obviously, there is some factor that we do not
understand. It could be a hundred things.
What if, when God Created Adam and Eve, they were the first
"humans" with SOULS. Maybe He had earlier let the
"scientific" thing proceed with the animals and such, and maybe some
beings eventually came to exist that would appear identical to us, except
without Souls. As far as God was concerned, maybe they would just be
"animals." Maybe THAT is the "unspecified fact"
that exists as a background. In that case, Nod could have had
lots of such "critters", and
they looked like us. But, without Souls, well ... , not a lot of good
might have proceeded in that direction.
These comments are my speculation, and a hundred equally
"logical" scenarios might have occurred instead.
You might be able to think of various other "logical" possibilities.
We humans are pretty arrogant sometimes, and we want to believe that
we know EVERYTHING! There seems like a pretty good chance that there are
many things that are, and forever will be, beyond our collective
intellect! Maybe we're just are not as smart as we often think we are!
- Question: In trying to match up Genesis 1 with scientific findings,
Light comes first in both, and people came last in both. Actually,
virtually ALL events seem to match up amazingly well. Only the reference
to birds in Genesis is one step earlier than science believes they appeared.
How could the SEQUENCE of Genesis 1 (composed 3300 years ago) be so
amazingly identical to what modern science has discovered during the
recent hundred years? A related page here shows that there are over
87,000,000,000 different sequences were possible for that early
composer of Genesis 1 (called 14 factorial, regarding the 14 apparent
events mentioned in Genesis 1).
- My Answer:
- The ONLY explanation which seems possible to me is that God HAD
TO HAVE EXISTED, as He was the Only Being that knew what the correct
sequence actually was. Seems to me that this provides a Scientific,
Stastical PROOF that God certainly Existed!
The birds discrepancy could actually be due to a copyists error regarding the
Scripture. As I said, the ORIGINAL was certainly true and accurate, but
there are many documented cases where a Scribe had miscopied letters or even
words in making his copy of Scripture. The reference to the birds and the
crawlies and the bigger creatures are all VERY close together in the Bible,
and, for other than nit-pickers like me, the details of the sequence might
have seemed of minimal importance to a Scribe. What if the birds reference
was originally several words later in the original
text? And somehow got accidentally moved forward a few words
to its present location?
On the other hand, science is always considered to be a work-in-progress,
where future discoveries WILL certainly refine current conclusions.
So, the "discrepancy"
could have its cause from either or both sides! I mean, tomorrow, a REALLY
old fossil of a bird might be found, and science would then have to figure
out how they developed, before dinosaurs and such! OR, someone might
find an especially old Bible Manuscript which has slightly different
Each person must decide for himself/herself regarding a variety of
religious subjects. Churches and religions and "experts"
can give opinions, but that is really what they are, opinions.
It seems to me that it is reasonable to ask several logical questions
in the pursuit of Truth.
- The first is, does God exist?
- If your answer is no, then the subject is pretty much closed!
If your answer is yes, He exists, then a follow-up question seems
- Does God have Principles, Ethics, Morals?
- If your answer is no, then we are all in a horrible situation,
where God could choose to be irrational, unfair, capricious.
There are people who believe this. But I look at the history of
everything that is known. As far as is known, the Sun has risen
at the proper time each day, gravity has worked consistently,
no buildings or fields or cities just disappear or reappear illogically.
Based on this rather massive evidence of all history and all experience,
I am tempted to think that the Universe appears to be consistent
and logical. That suggests that God does not apply irrational
actions or motives. I take that to suggest that He has at least
several positive characteristics. If we grant Him "several"
admirable traits, I am willing to accept that He has additional
admirable traits which we cannot confirm or deny.
So, if your answer is yes, that He is ethical and moral, then a
follow-up question seems logical:
- Did He participate in the composition of the Bible?
- If your answer is no, then you need to explain the specific
sequence of events listed in Genesis 1. It has only been in the
past hundred years or so that science has begun to establish
just when those several events occurred. Even skeptics agree that
the Bible has said that Light came first, for at least 3300 years!
That statement must have seemed odd to many people. Why Light first?
Why not Man, to witness everything? Why not the Earth, to stand on?
But Genesis 1 said that Light was first. It is only in the past
hundred years that science has discovered that stars are older
than anything else we know, and therefore that their light existed
before anything else. Prior to a hundred years ago, how could anyone
have known that? Or even guessed it? So, if God was NOT involved
in composing Genesis 1, how could any ancient human have known to write
down that Light came first?
So, if your answer is yes, God is ethical and moral and He participated
in the composition of the Bible, then a follow-up question seems
- Would such an ethical, moral, honorable God have either
intentionally put falsehoods or misleading statements in His Book
or even permitted the human authors to do such?
- This represents the INTERESTING part! Given these seemingly
logical questions and conclusions, it would seem that He would
have assured that the (Original) Manuscripts of the Bible would
have been precisely accurate and Truthful.
This seems to imply that, for an absolute fact, the Flood occurred,
David slew Goliath, Moses received the Ten Commandments, and all
the rest, EXACTLY as it was presented in those Original Manuscripts.
Now, it is well established that Scribes, in copying the roughly
three million characters of the text of the Bible, have occasionally
made minor errors (which are now known and have been corrected, through
a comparison of thousands of early Manuscripts). Amazingly, that
(ongoing) research has also discovered that several Scribes had
(in the first few centuries after Christ) even added some text that
was intended as clarifying statements, and those modifications, too,
have been largely recognized and corrected.
But the point is, all of the central Teachings of the Bible have NOT
been altered or mis-copied. That means that, even without ANY
(current) scientific documentation, we can confidently say that
the Flood of Noah actually occurred. More than that: If God told
us that He took Six Days to create the Universe, that statement MUST
be the Truth. Otherwise, He was either intentionally telling us a
falsehood, or He made an error, or He permitted a central error
to exist in the Bible.
Now, none of this actually PROVES anything. It will always come
down to a person's personal choice as to what to believe, a
matter of Faith. These questions and discussion are only meant
to suggest a way to look at the situation, to think through it.
My conclusion from this is that God exists, He is Good, He guided
the composition of the Bible and He made sure it was all Correct
and Truthful. So, when many modern Christians see seemingly
illogical stories in the Bible, especially things that modern
science seems to challenge, I find it sad (and inappropriate)
when they then begin to pick through the Bible's contents to
decide which parts they want to believe and which they choose
to disbelieve. In a word, Hogwash!
As a person who was educated as a serious scientist (my College
Degree was in Nuclear Physics), I am familiar with logic
and the value in analytical thought and all it has accomplished
within the realm of science. I have little question regarding
that, and accept nearly all of what science has so far figured
out. But at the same time, using the same scientific analytical
approach, those questions above lead me to totally believe in
The fact that the two perspectives seem to sometimes be in
disagreement, THAT is where it all gets interesting! I see
it that both MUST be true (for different reasons) and therefore,
that there must be some "Larger Truth" that somehow
includes both views as being separately correct.
In an exploration of such matters, I have done extensive study
during my life. I have written an essay that presents
those efforts, at Compatibility between
Christianity and Science.
This presentation was first placed on the Internet in August 2000.
This page - -
- - is at
This subject presentation was last updated on - -
Link to the Public Service Religious Projects Index
Link to the Public Services Main Menu
C Johnson, Pastor
A Christ Walk Church
BELIEVE Religious Information Source web-site