Jeffrey Epstein raped many dozens (at least 80 girls that Miami Herald Reporter Julie K. Brown has interviewed) of very young girls. He was so rich that his Lawyers would get him off from any punishment. He proved that ten years ago in Florida when his Lawyer (Alan Dershowitz) achieved reducing his punishment for multiple pedophilia rapes to only having to sit in an unlocked County Jail cell, and essentially only once a week on Sunday for 13 months. In other words, no punishment for his multiple pedophilia at all.
But modern Forensic DNA Research organizations might be able to GUARANTEE that he would have been fully punished this time in New York.
It is a proven scientific fact that all human males eject 250,000,000 sperm every time he ejaculates, and every one of those sub-microscopic sperm contain his entire unique DNA. Each of those Epstein rape victims (or their families) should have preserved her underwear. If any of those girls sends her underwear to a Forensic DNA Analysis Research Laboratory, maybe the whole 250,000,000 of Epstein's DNA may not still exist on her underwear, but even after multiple launderings, there may be as many as 5,000,000 of Epstein's sperm and DNA on her underwear. Forensic DNA Analysis Laboratories only need TEN DNA to absolutely identify a criminal rape.
It will be an ABSOLUTE PROOF that he did that rape(s). Epstein's Lawyers would have no way of explaining how HIS DNA could now be found on her underwear. And she would not have to face powerful Lawyers who might try to do a "he said" "she said" defense of Epstein to a Judge. Proven DNA Forensic technologies would have assured that Epstein would have spent the rest of his life in prison. DNA Forensic Analysis experts say that they only need 10 of his DNA, and each girl's underwear may provide them with many millions of Epstein's DNA.
Even when Brett Kavanaugh (tried) to rape Christine Blasey-Ford, 37 years ago, and he was too drunk to accomplish the rape, he still laid on top of her on the bed and rubbed his genitals against her clothing and swimsuit. In other words, that teen aged swimsuit and summer dress accumulated as much as 250,000,000 DNA of Kavanaugh. DNA is very durable, and even if that swimsuit (and other clothing that Blasey-Ford was wearing that day), was laundered many times, if her mother had saved her teen-aged swimsuit (as a memento up in their attic), then even today, 37 years later, there are certainly millions of Kavanaugh's (unique) DNA that are stored up in that attic. Modern Police Forensic DNA Analysis experts, which only need ten DNA to identify a criminal regarding such a crime, the fact that quite likely, 5,000,000 of Kavanaugh's sperm and DNA are currently still on Christine's teen-aged swimsuit (and summer dress), a Police Forensic Lab only needs to identify ten of Kavanaugh's DNA to prove that he LIED UNDER OATH to the Senate Hearing to get his job at the Supreme Court.
Donald Trump enjoyed getting very young girls to sit on his lap for many photos, including his own daughter, Ivanka. His personality strongly suggests that Trump certainly ejaculated (possibly inside his pants) during those various photos. Whether or not he more directly sexually molested or raped any of the very young girls in those photos, the very NUMBERS seem likely to have created criminal evidence against him. If he ejected 250,000,000 sub-microscopic sperm (inside his pants), there seems a very strong probability that SOME of his 250,000,000 of sub-microscopic sperm passed THROUGH his underwear and pants, where at least a million of Trump's sperm (and therefore, his DNA) wound up ON THE YOUNG GIRL'S CLOTHING. Since Police Forensic DNA Analysis only needs TEN DNA of a man to identify the man as a sexual predator or molester, if any of those girls would provide her clothing to a Police DNA Forensic Analysis, we probably would have conclusive proof of some of the many times when Trump did his sexual predator activities that he seemed so proud of in his recorded statements regarding grabbing women's and girls' genitals.
Donald Trump and Epstein were charged with raping a 13-year old girl, (Katie Johnson) who had a young eyewitness for every incident (Tiffany Doe) but Cohen threatened Katie's family's lives and Trump's Lawyers got that case dismissed due to lack of alleged sufficient evidence. But that event was recent enough that the girl may still have the underwear and clothing she wore on the four separate days of the sexual assaults by Trump. If she provides that underwear to a Forensic DNA Analysis Laboratory, they would only need to find TEN of Trump's 250,000,000 sperm and DNA to prove and convict him of having raped a very young, 13-year old girl.
The main Lawyer who had eliminated most of the punishment for Epstein in Florida, seems to potentially have participated in more. At least one teen-aged girl now claims that Alan Dershowitz had sex with her. Yesterday, Dershowitz amazed a Reporter by admitting that he had gotten a massage in Epstein's home, but he now claims that he kept his underwear on and that the masseuse was a very, very old Russian woman. No one believes that, but it might now be useful to also do the Forensic DNA Analysis on the many under-aged girls' underwear for matches to Dershowitz' DNA! But IF Epstein actually DID have an elderly Russian Masseuse in his home, along with the hundreds of teen-aged girls, it would be fair to get the DNA from the elderly Russian masseuse. I personally have doubts if such an elderly masseuse was EVER in Epstein's home!
http://mb-soft.com/public4/nomore.html is a web-site that fully describes this concept.
This presentation was first placed on the Internet in July 2019.This page - - - - is at