**They all ASSUMED that all Gravitational Force exclusively arises from the
exact center of the Earth, which is wrong.** The Gravitational existence
of the Moon causes the existence of a gravitational-balance-point of the
Earth-Moon system that we call the Barycenter. The Barycenter is just over
a thousand miles deep in
the Earth (about 2902 miles or 4677 km) away from the exact center of the
Earth. The Barycenter is actually a stationary point in the Earth-Moon
system, where both the Earth and Moon "wobble" around it. The center of the
Earth and the rest of the Earth (and us) constantly moves around the
Barycenter at around 793 mph (or 1276 kph)
due to our daily rotation. We also "wobble"
around the Barycenter at about 27 mph (or 44 km/hr) due to the monthly
orbiting of the Moon around us.

Every day, at Moonrise and at Moonset, the net gravitational Force acting on any experiment at any location on the surface of the Earth is altered by the "sideways" gravitational attraction of the Moon. A few hours later. as the Moon gets near the zenith in that local sky, the gravitational attraction of the Earth and Moon compete so G is then less. A few hours later when the Moon (hidden) is at the nadir in the local sky, the Earth and Moon combine to produce a larger collective gravitational force AT THAT LOCATION. These changes happen constantly and an hour difference can affect the net effect (of the Barycenter). These effects also are affected by the Latitude of an experimental apparatus, so for a precise experimental result, it is critical to know the exact location of the Moon in the sky, the Latitude and Longitude of the experimental apparatus, and the exact time at which the experiment was done.

All gravitational attraction in the Earth-Moon system actually arises from the Barycenter, which causes some Vector Force complications, since both ends of such Force Vectors are constantly moving at rather high velocities and in complex directions. If we consider a three-dimensional reference system of the center of the Earth, then the location of the Barycenter constantly changes by 793 ± 27 mph (or 1276 ± 44 kph), while the location of any experiment on the surface of the Earth constantly moves at even higher velocities as the Earth rotates.

Rather than the previously assumed gravitational attraction toward the exact center of the Earth, we actually have a far more complex situation of the actual gravitational attraction toward the fast-moving Barycenter deep within the Earth, of every object on the surface of the Earth which is also moving at high velocity.

A useful graph would therefore require the exact location and time of each experiment which is performed to be known, and also a calculation of the exact location of the Barycenter be known at that instant. Rather than the previously assumed Newtonian calculation being done for the exact center of the Earth, some Vector gravitational Force calculations needed to be done for the Space Angle from the (instantaneous) Barycenter at that moment for that exact instantaneous experiment location. Only then could the correct data points be presented in such a graph. Such analysis and correction for each data point would be possible even now to make this graph to become useful.

Anderson et al make several astounding claims in the data in this graph.
The 13 data points are claimed to lie on an impressive sine-wave curve
which (amazingly) exactly resembles a totally different sine-wave curve,
which has to do with very tiny variations in the LOD (length of day). The
shown individual (red) error factors for each value seem to deny any validity for
such a really precise sine-wave curve. I also tried to duplicate the
r-squared data analysis which is critical to validity of any such
graph, where the common expectation is a r^{2} of at least 0.99.
When I tried to use their data points to generate an r^{2} error
value, I was unable to even get an r^{2} of 0.60.

They claim that the set of 13 measurements of G exhibit a 5.9-year periodic oscillation (solid curve) that closely resembles the 5.9-year oscillation in LOD measurements (dashed curve). The two outliers are a 2014 quantum measurement and a 1996 measurement.

(Phys.org) Newton's Gravitational constant, *G*,
has been measured about a dozen times over the last 40 years, but the
results have varied by much more than would be expected due to random
and systematic errors. Now scientists have found that the measured
*G* values oscillate over time like a sine wave with a period of
5.9 years. It's not *G* itself that is varying by this much, they
propose, but more likely something else is affecting the measurements.

There are a variety of important aspects of this subject which few people seem to have ever explored. For starters, most "scientific constants" happen to be SCALAR values, but a few are VECTOR values. The peculiar behavior of G in these recent decades seems to bring up the possibility that G might be a Vector quantity, where math (Vector) formulas might be affected by other parameters.

I see that after Anderson et al published their paper in 2015, a variety of comments regarding it occasionally even seemed to be aware of my February 2004 publication of this subject, where I had first started trying to get NASA or the ESA to do a G experiment as part of the many rockets we have launched toward the outer Solar System. I have proposed that a tiny satellite be added to a spacecraft, to orbit around the spacecraft, where we will precisely know the masses and orbital radii, to be able to calculate G to a thousand times better precision. I notice that no one seemed willing to mention my earlier work of eleven years or my name before their efforts.

Each borehole would be identical, at 20 cm (or 8 inches) in diameter. Two identical slender 5 cm diameter one-metric-ton metal rods would hang in each of the boreholes, balanced in each borehole over a quality pulley, at each end of a stainless steel cable. (shown in the graphic to the right as being blue and green.) A nearly frictionless pulley near the very top of each borehole, as illustrated in the drawing at the right, would support the pair of identical metric-ton rods in the borehole. The connecting cable would be 1 kilometer long, where one of the metal rods (shown here in blue) would hang near the bottom of the borehole and the other (shown here in green) would hang near the very top. The vertical distance between the two heavy metal rods inside the borehole would then be one kilometer. The metal rods are machined to each have a mass of one exactly one metric ton. The two heavy rods would then forever hang virtually stationary inside the borehole. The accuracy of the verticality of the borehole would be to ensure that neither weight nor cable would ever rub against the side of the borehole in case of an earthquake. The top of the borehole would be sealed, such that no heat should ever enter or leave the borehole in following seasons or years.

Even with imprecise measurements occurring, and unknown temperatures and air pressures existing in different locations inside the borehole, each borehole would have a virtual balance of the two weights, much like the way a deep water well and rope and bucket is arranged.

**However, the upper metal rod would have an EARTH RADIUS of 1 km greater
than that of the lower rod. Using Newton's equation of Gravitation, the
precise attraction between the Earth and each of the two rods can be
calculated.**

The mass of the Earth is a constant quantity and so
is the Gravitational Constant. We do not know either of these quantities
very precisely, but the mass of the Earth is about 5.97 * 10^{24}
kg and G is known to be about 6.674 * 10^{-11} m^{3} / sec^{2} / kg.
A variety of experiments has enabled us to accurately know the product
of the mass of the Earth times the Gravitational Constant, or
G * M_{E}, which we call Mu. For the Earth (IGNORING THE MOON), Mu
is accurately known to be 3.986 004 * 10^{14} m^{3} /
sec^{2}.

We know that the Radius of the Earth (at the surface sea level at the Equator) is 6,378,137 meters. Each of the two metal rods hanging in the borehole are machined to have exactly 1,000 kg mass.

We can now calculate the exact Gravitational attraction between the LOWER
rod to the center of the Earth of F = G * M_{E} * 1000 /
R_{b}^{2}. This is 3.986 004 * 10^{14}
m^{3} / sec^{2} * 1000 kg / (6,377,137^{2}) m^{2},
which is **9801.357 634 nt**.

The UPPER rod is one kilometer directly above it, and so it would have a
gravitational attraction to the center of the Earth of F = G * M_{E}
* 1000 / R_{u}^{2}.
We can now calculate the exact Gravitational attraction between the UPPER
rod to the center of the Earth of F = G * M_{E} * 1000 /
R_{u}^{2}. This is 3.986 004 * 10^{14}
m^{3} / sec^{2} * 1000 kg / (6,378,137^{2}) m^{2},
which is **9798.284 452 nt**.

The NET tension on the connecting cable is then = 9801.357 634 nt -
9798.284 452 nt or **3.073 182 newtons different**. This is the
tension reading of **313.590 grams difference**.

**As a result, and continuously, there would be a slight imbalance, which
would be constantly monitored by a (red) electronic Tension Gauge
attached between the cable and the wall of the borehole.**

In the event that the value of G might slightly change over time, the continuously monitored tension reading would therefore immediately change.

It would not just be a reading thirteen times over forty years, but instead it would be a continuous and precise value of G. It would even be monitored at a hundred different locations along the Equator.

These tension gauge readings would be so extremely accurate that exact CAUSES for any changes might be monitored and known.

**For example, if the value of G somehow increased by one part in a
million, the Tension Gauge would increase by about 1/3 of a
milligram, an obvious change in the monitored tension.**

It seems that such experiments might also be able to monitor the location of the Barycenter, which we have never been able to measure up to now.

If my "hundred boreholes around the Equator" would be installed, then even more valuable data might be collected. It might happen that all hundred tension gauges might change in unison, but it might also be possible that whatever effects of a changing G might progress around the Earth, which might provide some experimental evidence for how rapidly the process of Gravitation occurs. This methodology seems accurate enough to even detect if the Gravitation process might occur at several times faster than the speed of light, although that would await actual experimental evidence to confirm or deny.

The determination of the Earth Radius at the sea level surface of the borehole is reasonably accurately known (probably to the nearest foot, that is to one part in about twenty million). The exact mass of each of the two metal rods can be measured to the nearest milligram, that is, one part in a billion. A Laser Ranging device is installed between the two metal rods, so that the exact difference in Earth Radius between the two rods can be determined, within a millimeter, that is to one part in a billion.

With these very accurate values, Newton's Gravitation formula could be used to determine Mu to extreme precision. An extremely accurate value of G might then be obtained, even from one borehole.

My personal suspicion is that the "unnoticed" relative movement of the body
of the Earth to the location of the Barycenter of the Earth-Moon system might
turn out to be a prominent effect in the recently discovered allegedly
sinusoidal variation of the value of the Gravitational Constant regarding
the Earth.

Public ServiceCategories |

Self-Sufficiency - Many Suggestions
Environmental Subjects Scientific Subjects Advanced Physics Social Subjects Religious Subjects Public Services Home Page Main Menu |

E-mail |

My earlier published work of February 2004 is regarding a different scientific approach to accurately measuring G, by adding a precise tiny "satellite" to "orbit" spacecraft which we launch toward the outer portions of our Solar System, to eliminate all spurious gravitational effects on such an experiment, at Accurate Mass of the Earth. A new Important Gravitational Constant Experiment. (Feb 2004)

This presentation was first placed on the Internet in February 2017.

This page - - **
** - - is at **
**

This subject presentation was last updated on - -

Link to the Public Services Home Page

http://mb-soft.com/index.html

Link to the Public Services Main Menu

http://mb-soft.com/index.html

E-mail to: http://mb-soft.com/index.html

C Johnson, Theoretical Physicist, Physics Degree from Univ of Chicago