Writings of Augustine. The City of God.
Advanced Information
The City of God.
translated by Rev. Marcus Dods, D.D.
Published in 1886 by Philip Schaff,
New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co.
.
Book XV.
Argument--Having treated in the four preceding books of the origin of
the two cities, the earthly and the heavenly, Augustin explains their
growth and progress in the four books which follow; and, in order to
do so, he explains the chief passages of the sacred history which bear
upon this subject. In this fifteenth book he opens this part of his
work by explaining the events recorded in Genesis from the time of
Cain and Abel to the deluge.
Chapter 1.--Of the Two Lines of the Human Race Which from First to
Last Divide It.
Of the bliss of Paradise, of Paradise itself, and of the life of our
first parents there, and of their sin and punishment, many have
thought much, spoken much, written much. We ourselves, too, have
spoken of these things in the foregoing books, and have written either
what we read in the Holy Scriptures, or what we could reasonably
deduce from them. And were we to enter into a more detailed
investigation of these matters, an endless number of endless questions
would arise, which would involve us in a larger work than the present
occasion admits. We cannot be expected to find room for replying to
every question that may be started by unoccupied and captious men, who
are ever more ready to ask questions than capable of understanding the
answer. Yet I trust we have already done justice to these great and
difficult questions regarding the beginning of the world, or of the
soul, or of the human race itself. This race we have distributed into
two parts, the one consisting of those who live according to man, the
other of those who live according to God. And these we also
mystically call the two cities, or the two communities of men, of
which the one is predestined to reign eternally with God, and the
other to suffer eternal punishment with the devil. This, however, is
their end, and of it we are to speak afterwards. At present, as we
have said enough about their origin, whether among the angels, whose
numbers we know not, or in the two first human beings, it seems
suitable to attempt an account of their career, from the time when our
two first parents began to propagate the race until all human
generation shall cease. For this whole time or world-age, in which
the dying give place and those who are born succeed, is the career of
these two cities concerning which we treat.
|
|
Of these two first parents of the human race, then, Cain was the
first-born, and he belonged to the city of men; after him was born
Abel, who belonged to the city of God. For as in the individual the
truth of the apostle's statement is discerned, "that is not first
which is spiritual, but that which is natural, and afterward that
which is spiritual," [767] whence it comes to pass that each man,
being derived from a condemned stock, is first of all born of Adam
evil and carnal, and becomes good and spiritual only afterwards, when
he is grafted into Christ by regeneration: so was it in the human
race as a whole. When these two cities began to run their course by a
series of deaths and births, the citizen of this world was the
first-born, and after him the stranger in this world, the citizen of
the city of God, predestinated by grace, elected by grace, by grace a
stranger below, and by grace a citizen above. By grace,--for so far
as regards himself he is sprung from the same mass, all of which is
condemned in its origin; but God, like a potter (for this comparison
is introduced by the apostle judiciously, and not without thought), of
the same lump made one vessel to honor, another to dishonor. [768]
But first the vessel to dishonor was made, and after it another to
honor. For in each individual, as I have already said, there is first
of all that which is reprobate, that from which we must begin, but in
which we need not necessarily remain; afterwards is that which is
well-approved, to which we may by advancing attain, and in which, when
we have reached it we may abide. Not, indeed, that every wicked man
shall be good, but that no one will be good who was not first of all
wicked; but the sooner any one becomes a good man, the more speedily
does he receive this title, and abolish the old name in the new.
Accordingly, it is recorded of Cain that he built a city, [769] but
Abel, being a sojourner, built none. For the city of the saints is
above, although here below it begets citizens, in whom it sojourns
till the time of its reign arrives, when it shall gather together all
in the day of the resurrection; and then shall the promised kingdom be
given to them, in which they shall reign with their Prince, the King
of the ages, time without end.
Footnotes
[767] 1 Cor. xv. 46.
[768] Rom. ix. 21.
[769] Gen. iv. 17.
Chapter 2.--Of the Children of the Flesh and the Children of the
Promise.
There was indeed on earth, so long as it was needed, a symbol and
foreshadowing image of this city, which served the purpose of
reminding men that such a city was to be rather than of making it
present; and this image was itself called the holy city, as a symbol
of the future city, though not itself the reality. Of this city which
served as an image, and of that free city it typified, Paul writes to
the Galatians in these terms: "Tell me, ye that desire to be under
the law, do ye not hear the law? For it is written, that Abraham had
two sons, the one by a bond maid, the other by a free woman. But he
who was of the bond woman was born after the flesh, but he of the free
woman was by promise. Which things are an allegory: [770]for these
are the two covenants; the one from the mount Sinai, which gendereth
to bondage, which is Agar. For this Agar is mount Sinai in Arabia,
and answereth to Jerusalem which now is, and is in bondage with her
children. But Jerusalem which is above is free, which is the mother
of us all. For it is written, Rejoice, thou barren that bearest not;
break forth and cry, thou that travailest not, for the desolate hath
many more children than she which hath an husband. Now we, brethren,
as Isaac was, are the children of promise. But as then he that was
born after the flesh persecuted him that was born after the Spirit,
even so it is now. Nevertheless, what saith the Scripture? Cast out
the bond woman and her son: for the son of the bond woman shall not
be heir with the son of the free woman. And we, brethren, are not
children of the bond woman, but of the free, in the liberty wherewith
Christ hath made us free." [771]This interpretation of the passage,
handed down to us with apostolic authority, shows how we ought to
understand the Scriptures of the two covenants--the old and the new.
One portion of the earthly city became an image of the heavenly city,
not having a significance of its own, but signifying another city, and
therefore serving, or "being in bondage." For it was founded not for
its own sake, but to prefigure another city; and this shadow of a city
was also itself foreshadowed by another preceding figure. For Sarah's
handmaid Agar, and her son, were an image of this image. And as the
shadows were to pass away when the full light came, Sarah, the free
woman, who prefigured the free city (which again was also prefigured
in another way by that shadow of a city Jerusalem), therefore said,
"Cast out the bond woman and her son; for the son of the bond woman
shall not be heir with my son Isaac," or, as the apostle says, "with
the son of the free woman." In the earthly city, then, we find two
things--its own obvious presence, and its symbolic presentation of the
heavenly city. Now citizens are begotten to the earthly city by
nature vitiated by sin, but to the heavenly city by grace freeing
nature from sin; whence the former are called "vessels of wrath," the
latter "vessels of mercy." [772]And this was typified in the two
sons of Abraham,--Ishmael, the son of Agar the handmaid, being born
according to the flesh, while Isaac was born of the free woman Sarah,
according to the promise. Both, indeed, were of Abraham's seed; but
the one was begotten by natural law, the other was given by gracious
promise. In the one birth, human action is revealed; in the other, a
divine kindness comes to light.
Footnotes
[770] Comp. De Trin. xv. c. 15.
[771] Gal. iv. 21-31.
[772] Rom. ix. 22, 23.
Chapter 3.--That Sarah's Barrenness was Made Productive by God's
Grace.
Sarah, in fact, was barren; and, despairing of offspring, and being
resolved that she would have at least through her handmaid that
blessing she saw she could not in her own person procure, she gave her
handmaid to her husband, to whom she herself had been unable to bear
children. From him she required this conjugal duty, exercising her
own right in another's womb. And thus Ishmael was born according to
the common law of human generation, by sexual intercourse. Therefore
it is said that he was born "according to the flesh,"--not because
such births are not the gifts of God, nor His handiwork, whose
creative wisdom "reaches," as it is written, "from one end to another
mightily, and sweetly doth she order all things," [773] but because,
in a case in which the gift of God, which was not due to men and was
the gratuitous largess of grace, was to be conspicuous, it was
requisite that a son be given in a way which no effort of nature could
compass. Nature denies children to persons of the age which Abraham
and Sarah had now reached; besides that, in Sarah's case, she was
barren even in her prime. This nature, so constituted that offspring
could not be looked for, symbolized the nature of the human race
vitiated by sin and by just consequence condemned, which deserves no
future felicity. Fitly, therefore, does Isaac, the child of promise,
typify the children of grace, the citizens of the free city, who dwell
together in everlasting peace, in which self-love and self-will have
no place, but a ministering love that rejoices in the common joy of
all, of many hearts makes one, that is to say, secures a perfect
concord.
Footnotes
[773] Wisdom viii. 1.
Chapter 4.--Of the Conflict and Peace of the Earthly City.
But the earthly city, which shall not be everlasting (for it will no
longer be a city when it has been committed to the extreme penalty),
has its good in this world, and rejoices in it with such joy as such
things can afford. But as this is not a good which can discharge its
devotees of all distresses, this city is often divided against itself
by litigations, wars, quarrels, and such victories as are either
life-destroying or short-lived. For each part of it that arms against
another part of it seeks to triumph over the nations through itself in
bondage to vice. If, when it has conquered, it is inflated with
pride, its victory is life-destroying; but if it turns its thoughts
upon the common casualties of our mortal condition, and is rather
anxious concerning the disasters that may befall it than elated with
the successes already achieved, this victory, though of a higher kind,
is still only short-lived; for it cannot abidingly rule over those
whom it has victoriously subjugated. But the things which this city
desires cannot justly be said to be evil, for it is itself, in its own
kind, better than all other human good. For it desires earthly peace
for the sake of enjoying earthly goods, and it makes war in order to
attain to this peace; since, if it has conquered, and there remains no
one to resist it, it enjoys a peace which it had not while there were
opposing parties who contested for the enjoyment of those things which
were too small to satisfy both. This peace is purchased by toilsome
wars; it is obtained by what they style a glorious victory. Now, when
victory remains with the party which had the juster cause, who
hesitates to congratulate the victor, and style it a desirable peace?
These things, then, are good things, and without doubt the gifts of
God. But if they neglect the better things of the heavenly city,
which are secured by eternal victory and peace never-ending, and so
inordinately covet these present good things that they believe them to
be the only desirable things, or love them better than those things
which are believed to be better,--if this be so, then it is necessary
that misery follow and ever increase.
Chapter 5.--Of the Fratricidal Act of the Founder of the Earthly City,
and the Corresponding Crime of the Founder of Rome.
Thus the founder of the earthly city was a fratricide. Overcome with
envy, he slew his own brother, a citizen of the eternal city, and a
sojourner on earth. So that we cannot be surprised that this first
specimen, or, as the Greeks say, archetype of crime, should, long
afterwards, find a corresponding crime at the foundation of that city
which was destined to reign over so many nations, and be the head of
this earthly city of which we speak. For of that city also, as one of
their poets has mentioned, "the first walls were stained with a
brother's blood," [774] or, as Roman history records, Remus was slain
by his brother Romulus. And thus there is no difference between the
foundation of this city and of the earthly city, unless it be that
Romulus and Remus were both citizens of the earthly city. Both
desired to have the glory of founding the Roman republic, but both
could not have as much glory as if one only claimed it; for he who
wished to have the glory of ruling would certainly rule less if his
power were shared by a living consort. In order, therefore, that the
whole glory might be enjoyed by one, his consort was removed; and by
this crime the empire was made larger indeed, but inferior, while
otherwise it would have been less, but better. Now these brothers,
Cain and Abel, were not both animated by the same earthly desires, nor
did the murderer envy the other because he feared that, by both
ruling, his own dominion would be curtailed,--for Abel was not
solicitous to rule in that city which his brother built,--he was moved
by that diabolical, envious hatred with which the evil regard the
good, for no other reason than because they are good while themselves
are evil. For the possession of goodness is by no means diminished by
being shared with a partner either permanent or temporarily assumed;
on the contrary, the possession of goodness is increased in proportion
to the concord and charity of each of those who share it. In short,
he who is unwilling to share this possession cannot have it; and he
who is most willing to admit others to a share of it will have the
greatest abundance to himself. The quarrel, then, between Romulus and
Remus shows how the earthly city is divided against itself; that which
fell out between Cain and Abel illustrated the hatred that subsists
between the two cities, that of God and that of men. The wicked war
with the wicked; the good also war with the wicked. But with the
good, good men, or at least perfectly good men, cannot war; though,
while only going on towards perfection, they war to this extent, that
every good man resists others in those points in which he resists
himself. And in each individual "the flesh lusteth against the
spirit, and the spirit against the flesh." [775]This spiritual
lusting, therefore, can be at war with the carnal lust of another man;
or carnal lust may be at war with the spiritual desires of another, in
some such way as good and wicked men are at war; or, still more
certainly, the carnal lusts of two men, good but not yet perfect,
contend together, just as the wicked contend with the wicked, until
the health of those who are under the treatment of grace attains final
victory.
Footnotes
[774] Lucan, Phar. i. 95.
[775] Gal. v. 17.
Chapter 6.--Of the Weaknesses Which Even the Citizens of the City of
God Suffer During This Earthly Pilgrimage in Punishment of Sin, and of
Which They are Healed by God's Care.
This sickliness--that is to say, that disobedience of which we spoke
in the fourteenth book--is the punishment of the first disobedience.
It is therefore not nature, but vice; and therefore it is said to the
good who are growing in grace, and living in this pilgrimage by faith,
"Bear ye one another's burdens, and so fulfill the law of Christ."
[776] In like manner it is said elsewhere, "Warn them that are
unruly, comfort the feeble-minded, support the weak, be patient toward
all men. See that none render evil for evil unto any man." [777]
And in another place, "If a man be overtaken in a fault, ye which are
spiritual restore such an one in the spirit of meekness; considering
thyself, lest thou also be tempted." [778]And elsewhere, "Let not
the sun go down upon your wrath." [779]And in the Gospel, "If thy
brother shall trespass against thee, go and tell him his fault between
thee and him alone." [780]So too of sins which may create scandal
the apostle says, "Them that sin rebuke before all, that others also
may fear." [781]For this purpose, and that we may keep that peace
without which no man can see the Lord, [782] many precepts are given
which carefully inculcate mutual forgiveness; among which we may
number that terrible word in which the servant is ordered to pay his
formerly remitted debt of ten thousand talents, because he did not
remit to his fellow-servant his debt of two hundred pence. To which
parable the Lord Jesus added the words, "So likewise shall my heavenly
Father do also unto you, if ye from your hearts forgive not every one
his brother." [783]It is thus the citizens of the city of God are
healed while still they sojourn in this earth and sigh for the peace
of their heavenly country. The Holy Spirit, too, works within, that
the medicine externally applied may have some good result. Otherwise,
even though God Himself make use of the creatures that are subject to
Him, and in some human form address our human senses, whether we
receive those impressions in sleep or in some external appearance,
still, if He does not by His own inward grace sway and act upon the
mind, no preaching of the truth is of any avail. But this God does,
distinguishing between the vessels of wrath and the vessels of mercy,
by His own very secret but very just providence. When He Himself aids
the soul in His own hidden and wonderful ways, and the sin which
dwells in our members, and is, as the apostle teaches, rather the
punishment of sin, does not reign in our mortal body to obey the lusts
of it, and when we no longer yield our members as instruments of
unrighteousness, [784] then the soul is converted from its own evil
and selfish desires, and, God possessing it, it possesses itself in
peace even in this life, and afterwards, with perfected health and
endowed with im mortality, will reign without sin in peace
everlasting.
Footnotes
[776] Gal. vi. 2.
[777] 1 Thess. v. 14, 15.
[778] Gal. vi. 1.
[779] Eph. iv. 26.
[780] Matt. xviii. 15.
[781] 1 Tim. v. 20.
[782] Heb. xii. 14.
[783] Matt. xviii. 35.
[784] Rom. vi. 12, 13.
Chapter 7.--Of the Cause of Cain's Crime and His Obstinacy, Which Not
Even the Word of God Could Subdue.
But though God made use of this very mode of address which we have
been endeavoring to explain, and spoke to Cain in that form by which
He was wont to accommodate Himself to our first parents and converse
with them as a companion, what good influence had it on Cain? Did he
not fulfill his wicked intention of killing his brother even after he
was warned by God's voice? For when God had made a distinction
between their sacrifices, neglecting Cain's, regarding Abel's, which
was doubtless intimated by some visible sign to that effect; and when
God had done so because the works of the one were evil but those of
his brother good, Cain was very wroth, and his countenance fell. For
thus it is written: "And the Lord said unto Cain, Why are thou wroth,
and why is thy countenance fallen? If thou offerest rightly, but dost
not rightly distinguish, hast thou not sinned? Fret not thyself, for
unto thee shall be his turning, and thou shalt rule over him." [785]
In this admonition administered by God to Cain, that clause indeed,
"If thou offerest rightly, but dost not rightly distinguish, hast thou
not sinned?" is obscure, inasmuch as it is not apparent for what
reason or purpose it was spoken, and many meanings have been put upon
it, as each one who discusses it attempts to interpret it according to
the rule of faith. The truth is, that a sacrifice is "rightly
offered" when it is offered to the true God, to whom alone we must
sacrifice. And it is "not rightly distinguished" when we do not
rightly distinguish the places or seasons or materials of the
offering, or the person offering, or the person to whom it is
presented, or those to whom it is distributed for food after the
oblation. Distinguishing [786] is here used for
discriminating,--whether when an offering is made in a place where it
ought not or of a material which ought to be offered not there but
elsewhere; or when an offering is made at a wrong time, or of a
material suitable not then but at some other time; or when that is
offered which in no place nor any time ought to be offered; or when a
man keeps to himself choicer specimens of the same kind than he offers
to God; or when he or any other who may not lawfully partake profanely
eats of the oblation. In which of these particulars Cain displeased
God, it is difficult to determine. But the Apostle John, speaking of
these brothers, says, "Not as Cain, who was of that wicked one, and
slew his brother. And wherefore slew he him? Because his own works
were evil, and his brother's righteous." [787]He thus gives us to
understand that God did not respect his offering because it was not
rightly "distinguished" in this, that he gave to God something of his
own but kept himself to himself. For this all do who follow not God's
will but their own, who live not with an upright but a crooked heart,
and yet offer to God such gifts as they suppose will procure from Him
that He aid them not by healing but by gratifying their evil
passions. And this is the characteristic of the earthly city, that it
worships God or gods who may aid it in reigning victoriously and
peacefully on earth not through love of doing good, but through lust
of rule. The good use the world that they may enjoy God: the wicked,
on the contrary, that they may enjoy the world would fain use
God,--those of them, at least, who have attained to the belief that He
is and takes an interest in human affairs. For they who have not yet
attained even to this belief are still at a much lower level. Cain,
then, when he saw that God had respect to his brother's sacrifice, but
not to his own, should have humbly chosen his good brother as his
example, and not proudly counted him his rival. But he was wroth, and
his countenance fell. This angry regret for another person's
goodness, even his brother's, was charged upon him by God as a great
sin. And He accused him of it in the interrogation, "Why are thou
wroth, and why is thy countenance fallen?" For God saw that he envied
his brother, and of this He accused him. For to men, from whom the
heart of their fellow is hid, it might be doubtful and quite uncertain
whether that sadness bewailed his own wickedness by which, as he had
learned, he had displeased God, or his brother's goodness, which had
pleased God, and won His favorable regard to his sacrifice. But God,
in giving the reason why He refused to accept Cain's offering and why
Cain should rather have been displeased at himself than at his
brother, shows him that though he was unjust in "not rightly
distinguishing," that is, not rightly living and being unworthy to
have his offering received, he was more unjust by far in hating his
just brother without a cause.
Yet He does not dismiss him without counsel, holy, just, and good.
"Fret not thyself," He says, "for unto thee shall be his turning, and
thou shall rule over him." Over his brother, does He mean? Most
certainly not. Over what, then, but sin? For He had said, "Thou hast
sinned," and then He added, "Fret not thyself, for to thee shall be
its turning, and thou shall rule over it." [788]And the "turning"
of sin to the man can be understood of his conviction that the guilt
of sin can be laid at no other man's door but his own. For this is
the health-giving medicine of penitence, and the fit plea for pardon;
so that, when it is said, "To thee its turning," we must not supply
"shall be," but we must read, "To thee let its turning be,"
understanding it as a command, not as a prediction. For then shall a
man rule over his sin when he does not prefer it to himself and defend
it, but subjects it by repentance; otherwise he that becomes protector
of it shall surely become its prisoner. But if we understand this sin
to be that carnal concupiscence of which the apostle says, "The flesh
lusteth against the spirit," [789] among the fruits of which lust he
names envy, by which assuredly Cain was stung and excited to destroy
his brother, then we may properly supply the words "shall be," and
read, "To thee shall be its turning, and thou shalt rule over it."
For when the carnal part which the apostle calls sin, in that place
where he says, "It is not I who do it, but sin that dwelleth in me,"
[790] that part which the philosophers also call vicious, and which
ought not to lead the mind, but which the mind ought to rule and
restrain by reason from illicit motions,--when, then, this part has
been moved to perpetrate any wickedness, if it be curbed and if it
obey the word of the apostle, "Yield not your members instruments of
unrighteousness unto sin," [791] it is turned towards the mind and
subdued and conquered by it, so that reason rules over it as a
subject. It was this which God enjoined on him who was kindled with
the fire of envy against his brother, so that he sought to put out of
the way him whom he should have set as an example. "Fret not
thyself," or compose thyself, He says: withhold thy hand from crime;
let not sin reign in your mortal body to fulfill it in the lusts
thereof, nor yield your members instruments of unrighteousness unto
sin. "For to thee shall be its turning," so long as you do not
encourage it by giving it the rein, but bridle it by quenching its
fire. "And thou shalt rule over it;" for when it is not allowed any
external actings, it yields itself to the rule of the governing mind
and righteous will, and ceases from even internal motions. There is
something similar said in the same divine book of the woman, when God
questioned and judged them after their sin, and pronounced sentence on
them all,--the devil in the form of the serpent, the woman and her
husband in their own persons. For when He had said to her, "I will
greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow shall thou
bring forth children," then He added, "and thy turning shall be to thy
husband, and he shall rule over thee." [792]What is said to Cain
about his sin, or about the vicious concupiscence of his flesh, is
here said of the woman who had sinned; and we are to understand that
the husband is to rule his wife as the soul rules the flesh. And
therefore, says the apostle, "He that loveth his wife, loveth himself;
for no man ever yet hated his own flesh." [793]This flesh, then, is
to be healed, because it belongs to ourselves: is not to be abandoned
to destruction as if it were alien to our nature. But Cain received
that counsel of God in the spirit of one who did not wish to amend.
In fact, the vice of envy grew stronger in him; and, having entrapped
his brother, he slew him. Such was the founder of the earthly city.
He was also a figure of the Jews who slew Christ the Shepherd of the
flock of men, prefigured by Abel the shepherd of sheep: but as this
is an allegorical and prophetical matter, I forbear to explain it now;
besides, I remember that I have made some remarks upon it in writing
against Faustus the Manichæan. [794]
Footnotes
[785] Gen. iv. 6, 7.
[786] Literally, "division."
[787] 1 John iii. 12.
[788] We alter the pronoun to suit Augustin's interpretation.
[789] Gal. v. 17.
[790] Rom. vii. 17.
[791] Rom. vi. 13.
[792] Gen. iii. 16.
[793] Eph. v. 28, 29.
[794] C. Faustum. Man. xii. c. 9.
Chapter 8.--What Cain's Reason Was for Building a City So Early in the
History of the Human Race.
At present it is the history which I aim at defending, that Scripture
may not be reckoned incredible when it relates that one man built a
city at a time in which there seem to have been but four men upon
earth, or rather indeed but three, after one brother slew the
other,--to wit, the first man the father of all, and Cain himself, and
his son Enoch, by whose name the city was itself called. But they who
are moved by this consideration forget to take into account that the
writer of the sacred history does not necessarily mention all the men
who might be alive at that time, but those only whom the scope of his
work required him to name. The design of that writer (who in this
matter was the instrument of the Holy Ghost) was to descend to Abraham
through the successions of ascertained generations propagated from one
man, and then to pass from Abraham's seed to the people of God, in
whom, separated as they were from other nations, was prefigured and
predicted all that relates to the city whose reign is eternal, and to
its king and founder Christ, which things were foreseen in the Spirit
as destined to come; yet neither is this object so effected as that
nothing is said of the other society of men which we call the earthly
city, but mention is made of it so far as seemed needful to enhance
the glory of the heavenly city by contrast to its opposite.
Accordingly, when the divine Scripture, in mentioning the number of
years which those men lived, concludes its account of each man of whom
it speaks, with the words, "And he begat sons and daughters, and all
his days were so and so, and he died," are we to understand that,
because it does not name those sons and daughters, therefore, during
that long term of years over which one lifetime extended in those
early days, there might not have been born very many men, by whose
united numbers not one but several cities might have been built? But
it suited the purpose of God, by whose inspiration these histories
were composed, to arrange and distinguish from the first these two
societies in their several generations,--that on the one side the
generations of men, that is to say, of those who live according to
man, and on the other side the generations of the sons of God, that is
to say, of men living according to God, might be traced down together
and yet apart from one another as far as the deluge, at which point
their dissociation and association are exhibited: their dissociation,
inasmuch as the generations of both lines are recorded in separate
tables, the one line descending from the fratricide Cain, the other
from Seth, who had been born to Adam instead of him whom his brother
slew; their association, inasmuch as the good so deteriorated that the
whole race became of such a character that it was swept away by the
deluge, with the exception of one just man, whose name was Noah, and
his wife and three sons and three daughters-in-law, which eight
persons were alone deemed worthy to escape from that desolating
visitation which destroyed all men.
Therefore, although it is written, "And Cain knew his wife, and she
conceived and bare Enoch, and he builded a city and called the name of
the city after the name of his son Enoch," [795] it does not follow
that we are to believe this to have been his first-born; for we cannot
suppose that this is proved by the expression "he knew his wife," as
if then for the first time he had had intercourse with her. For in
the case of Adam, the father of all, this expression is used not only
when Cain, who seems to have been his first-born, was conceived, but
also afterwards the same Scripture says, "Adam knew Eve his wife, and
she conceived, and bare a son, and called his name Seth." [796]
Whence it is obvious that Scripture employs this expression neither
always when a birth is recorded nor then only when the birth of a
first-born is mentioned. Neither is it necessary to suppose that
Enoch was Cain's first-born because he named his city after him. For
it is quite possible that though he had other sons, yet for some
reason the father loved him more than the rest. Judah was not the
first-born, though he gives his name to Judæa and the Jews. But even
though Enoch was the first-born of the city's founder, that is no
reason for supposing that the father named the city after him as soon
as he was born; for at that time he, being but a solitary man, could
not have founded a civic community, which is nothing else than a
multitude of men bound together by some associating tie. But when his
family increased to such numbers that he had quite a population, then
it became possible to him both to build a city, and give it, when
founded, the name of his son. For so long was the life of those
antediluvians, that he who lived the shortest time of those whose
years are mentioned in Scripture attained to the age of 753 years.
[797]And though no one attained the age of a thousand years,
several exceeded the age of nine hundred. Who then can doubt that
during the lifetime of one man the human race might be so multiplied
that there would be a population to build and occupy not one but
several cities? And this might very readily be conjectured from the
fact that from one man, Abraham, in not much more than four hundred
years, the numbers of the Hebrew race so increased, that in the exodus
of that people from Egypt there are recorded to have been six hundred
thousand men capable of bearing arms, [798] and this over and above
the Idumæans, who, though not numbered with Israel's descendants, were
yet sprung from his brother, also a grandson of Abraham; and over and
above the other nations which were of the same stock of Abraham,
though not through Sarah,--that is, his descendants by Hagar and
Keturah, the Ishmaelites, Midianites, etc.
Footnotes
[795] Gen. iv. 17.
[796] Gen. iv. 25.
[797] Lamech, according to the LXX.
[798] Ex. xii. 37.
Chapter 9.--Of the Long Life and Greater Stature of the Antediluvians.
Wherefore no one who considerately weighs facts will doubt that Cain
might have built a city, and that a large one, when it is observed how
prolonged were the lives of men, unless perhaps some sceptic take
exception to this very length of years which our authors ascribe to
the antediluvians and deny that this is credible. And so, too, they
do not believe that the size of men's bodies was larger then than now,
though the most esteemed of their own poets, Virgil, asserts the same,
when he speaks of that huge stone which had been fixed as a landmark,
and which a strong man of those ancient times snatched up as he
fought, and ran, and hurled, and cast it,--
"Scarce twelve strong men of later mould
That weight could on their necks uphold." [799]
thus declaring his opinion that the earth then produced mightier men.
And if in the more recent times, how much more in the ages before the
world-renowned deluge? But the large size of the primitive human body
is often proved to the incredulous by the exposure of sepulchres,
either through the wear of time or the violence of torrents or some
accident, and in which bones of incredible size have been found or
have rolled out. I myself, along with some others, saw on the shore
at Utica a man's molar tooth of such a size, that if it were cut down
into teeth such as we have, a hundred, I fancy, could have been made
out of it. But that, I believe, belonged to some giant. For though
the bodies of ordinary men were then larger than ours, the giants
surpassed all in stature. And neither in our own age nor any other
have there been altogether wanting instances of gigantic stature,
though they may be few. The younger Pliny, a most learned man,
maintains that the older the world becomes, the smaller will be the
bodies of men. [800]And he mentions that Homer in his poems often
lamented the same decline; and this he does not laugh at as a poetical
figment, but in his character of a recorder of natural wonders accepts
it as historically true. But, as I said, the bones which are from
time to time discovered prove the size of the bodies of the ancients,
[801] and will do so to future ages, for they are slow to decay. But
the length of an antediluvian's life cannot now be proved by any such
monumental evidence. But we are not on this account to withhold our
faith from the sacred history, whose statements of past fact we are
the more inexcusable in discrediting, as we see the accuracy of its
prediction of what was future. And even that same Pliny [802] tells
us that there is still a nation in which men live 200 years. If,
then, in places unknown to us, men are believed to have a length of
days which is quite beyond our own experience, why should we not
believe the same of times distant from our own? Or are we to believe
that in other places there is what is not here, while we do not
believe that in other times there has been anything but what is now?
Footnotes
[799] Virgil, Æn., xii. 899, 900. Compare the Iliad, v. 302, and
Juvenal, xv. 65 et seqq. "Terra malos homines nunc educat
atque pusillos."
[800] Plin. Hist. Nat.. vii. 16.
[801] See the account given by Herodotus (i. 67) of the discovery of
the bones of Orestes, which, as the story goes, gave a stature of
seven cubits.
[802] Pliny, Hist. Nat. vii. 49, merely reports what he had read in
Hellanicus about the Epirotes of Etolia.
Chapter 10.--Of the Different Computation of the Ages of the
Antediluvians, Given by the Hebrew Manuscripts and by Our Own. [803]
Wherefore, although there is a discrepancy for which I cannot account
between our manuscripts and the Hebrew, in the very number of years
assigned to the antediluvians, yet the discrepancy is not so great
that they do not agree about their longevity. For the very first man,
Adam, before he begot his son Seth, is in our manuscripts found to
have lived 230 years, but in the Hebrew mss. 130. But after he begot
Seth, our copies read that he lived 700 years, while the Hebrew give
800. And thus, when the two periods are taken together, the sum
agrees. And so throughout the succeeding generations, the period
before the father begets a son is always made shorter by 100 years in
the Hebrew, but the period after his son is begotten is longer by 100
years in the Hebrew than in our copies. And thus, taking the two
periods together, the result is the same in both. And in the sixth
generation there is no discrepancy at all. In the seventh, however,
of which Enoch is the representative, who is recorded to have been
translated without death because he pleased God, there is the same
discrepancy as in the first five generations, 100 years more being
ascribed to him by our mss. before he begat a son. But still the
result agrees; for according to both documents he lived before he was
translated 365 years. In the eighth generation the discrepancy is
less than in the others, and of a different kind. For Methuselah,
whom Enoch begat, lived, before he begat his successor, not 100 years
less, but 100 years more, according to the Hebrew reading; and in our
mss. again these years are added to the period after he begat his son;
so that in this case also the sum-total is the same. And it is only
in the ninth generation, that is, in the age of Lamech, Methuselah's
son and Noah's father, that there is a discrepancy in the sum total;
and even in this case it is slight. For the Hebrew mss. represent him
as living twenty-four years more than ours assign to him. For before
he begat his son, who was called Noah, six years fewer are given to
him by the Hebrew mss. than by ours; but after he begat this son, they
give him thirty years more than ours; so that, deducting the former
six, there remains, as we said, a surplus of twenty-four.
Footnotes
[803] Our own Mss., of which Augustin here speaks, were the Latin
versions of the Septuagint used by the Church before Jerome's was
received; the "Hebrew Mss." were the versions made from the Hebrew
text. Compare De Doct. Christ. ii. 15 et seqq.
Chapter 11.--Of Methuselah's Age, Which Seems to Extend Fourteen Years
Beyond the Deluge.
From this discrepancy between the Hebrew books and our own arises the
well-known question as to the age of Methuselah; [804] for it is
computed that he lived for fourteen years after the deluge, though
Scripture relates that of all who were then upon the earth only the
eight souls in the ark escaped destruction by the flood, and of these
Methuselah was not one. For, according to our books, Methuselah,
before he begat the son whom he called Lamech, lived 167 years; then
Lamech himself, before his son Noah was born, lived 188 years, which
together make 355 years. Add to these the age of Noah at the date of
the deluge, 600 years, and this gives a total of 955 from the birth of
Methuselah to the year of the flood. Now all the years of the life of
Methuselah are computed to be 969; for when he had lived 167 years,
and had begotten his son Lamech, he then lived after this 802 years,
which makes a total, as we said, of 969 years. From this, if we
deduct 955 years from the birth of Methuselah to the flood, there
remains fourteen years, which he is supposed to have lived after the
flood. And therefore some suppose that, though he was not on earth
(in which it is agreed that every living thing which could not
naturally live in water perished), he was for a time with his father,
who had been translated, and that he lived there till the flood had
passed away. This hypothesis they adopt, that they may not cast a
slight on the trustworthiness of versions which the Church has
received into a position of high authority, [805] and because they
believe that the Jewish mss. rather than our own are in error. For
they do not admit that this is a mistake of the translators, but
maintain that there is a falsified statement in the original, from
which, through the Greek, the Scripture has been translated into our
own tongue. They say that it is not credible that the seventy
translators, who simultaneously and unanimously produced one
rendering, could have erred, or, in a case in which no interest of
theirs was involved, could have falsified their translation; but that
the Jews, envying us our translation of their Law and Prophets, have
made alterations in their texts so as to undermine the authority of
ours. This opinion or suspicion let each man adopt according to his
own judgment. Certain it is that Methuselah did not survive the
flood, but died in the very year it occurred, if the numbers given in
the Hebrew mss. are true. My own opinion regarding the seventy
translators I will, with God's help, state more carefully in its own
place, when I have come down (following the order which this work
requires) to that period in which their translation was executed.
[806]For the present question, it is enough that, according to our
versions, the men of that age had lives so long as to make it quite
possible that, during the lifetime of the first-born of the two sole
parents then on earth, the human race multiplied sufficiently to form
a community.
Footnotes
[804] Jerome (De Quæst. Heb. in Gen.) says it was a question famous in
all the churches--Vives.
[805] "Quos in auctoritatem celebriorum Ecclesia suscepit."
[806] See below, book xviii. c. 42-44.
Chapter 12.--Of the Opinion of Those Who Do Not Believe that in These
Primitive Times Men Lived So Long as is Stated.
For they are by no means to be listened to who suppose that in those
times years were differently reckoned, and were so short that one of
our years may be supposed to be equal to ten of theirs. So that they
say, when we read or hear that some man lived 900 years, we should
understand ninety, ten of those years making but one of ours, and ten
of ours equalling 100 of theirs. Consequently, as they suppose, Adam
was twenty-three years of age when he begat Seth, and Seth himself was
twenty years and six months old when his son Enos was born, though the
Scripture calls these months 205 years. For, on the hypothesis of
those whose opinion we are explaining, it was customary to divide one
such year as we have into ten parts, and to call each part a year.
And each of these parts was composed of six days squared; because God
finished His works in six days, that He might rest the seventh. Of
this I disputed according to my ability in the eleventh book. [807]
Now six squared, or six times six, gives thirty-six days; and this
multiplied by ten amounts to 360 days, or twelve lunar months. As for
the five remaining days which are needed to complete the solar year,
and for the fourth part of a day, which requires that into every
fourth or leap-year a day be added, the ancients added such days as
the Romans used to call "intercalary," in order to complete the number
of the years. So that Enos, Seth's son, was nineteen years old when
his son Cainan was born, though Scripture calls these years 190. And
so through all the generations in which the ages of the antediluvians
are given, we find in our versions that almost no one begat a son at
the age of 100 or under, or even at the age of 120 or thereabouts; but
the youngest fathers are recorded to have been 160 years old and
upwards. And the reason of this, they say, is that no one can beget
children when he is ten years old, the age spoken of by those men as
100, but that sixteen is the age of puberty, and competent now to
propagate offspring; and this is the age called by them 160. And that
it may not be thought incredible that in these days the year was
differently computed from our own, they adduce what is recorded by
several writers of history, that the Egyptians had a year of four
months, the Acarnanians of six, and the Lavinians of thirteen months.
[808]The younger Pliny, after mentioning that some writers reported
that one man had lived 152 years, another ten more, others 200, others
300, that some had even reached 500 and 600, and a few 800 years of
age, gave it as his opinion that all this must be ascribed to mistaken
computation. For some, he says, make summer and winter each a year;
others make each season a year, like the Arcadians, whose years, he
says, were of three months. He added, too, that the Egyptians, of
whose little years of four months we have spoken already, sometimes
terminated their year at the wane of each moon; so that with them
there are produced lifetimes of 1000 years.
By these plausible arguments certain persons, with no desire to weaken
the credit of this sacred history, but rather to facilitate belief in
it by removing the difficulty of such incredible longevity, have been
themselves persuaded, and think they act wisely in persuading others,
that in these days the year was so brief that ten of their years equal
but one of ours, while ten of ours equal 100 of theirs. But there is
the plainest evidence to show that this is quite false. Before
producing this evidence, however, it seems right to mention a
conjecture which is yet more plausible. From the Hebrew manuscripts
we could at once refute this confident statement; for in them Adam is
found to have lived not 230 but 130 years before he begat his third
son. If, then, this mean thirteen years by our ordinary computation,
then he must have begotten his first son when he was only twelve or
thereabouts. Who can at this age beget children according to the
ordinary and familiar course of nature? But not to mention him, since
it is possible he may have been able to beget his like as soon as he
was created,--for it is not credible that he was created so little as
our infants are,--not to mention him, his son was not 205 years old
when he begot Enos, as our versions have it, but 105, and
consequently, according to this idea, was not eleven years old. But
what shall I say of his son Cainan, who, though by our version 170
years old, was by the Hebrew text seventy when he beget Mahalaleel?
If seventy years in those times meant only seven of our years, what
man of seven years old begets children?
Footnotes
[807] C. 8.
[808] On this subject see Wilkinson's note to the second book
(appendix) of Rawlinson's Herodotus, where all available reference are
given.
Chapter 13.--Whether, in Computing Years, We Ought to Follow the
Hebrew or the Septuagint.
But if I say this, I shall presently be answered, It is one of the
Jews' lies. This, however, we have disposed of above, showing that it
cannot be that men of so just a reputation as the seventy translators
should have falsified their version. However, if I ask them which of
the two is more credible, that the Jewish nation, scattered far and
wide, could have unanimously conspired to forge this lie, and so,
through envying others the authority of their Scriptures, have
deprived themselves of their verity; or that seventy men, who were
also themselves Jews, shut up in one place (for Ptolemy king of Egypt
had got them together for this work), should have envied foreign
nations that same truth, and by common consent inserted these errors:
who does not see which can be more naturally and readily believed?
But far be it from any prudent man to believe either that the Jews,
however malicious and wrong-headed, could have tampered with so many
and so widely-dispersed manuscripts; or that those renowned seventy
individuals had any common purpose to grudge the truth to the
nations. One must therefore more plausibly maintain, that when first
their labors began to be transcribed from the copy in Ptolemy's
library, some such misstatement might find its way into the first copy
made, and from it might be disseminated far and wide; and that this
might arise from no fraud, but from a mere copyist's error. This is a
sufficiently plausible account of the difficulty regarding
Methuselah's life, and of that other case in which there is a
difference in the total of twenty-four years. But in those cases in
which there is a methodical resemblance in the falsification, so that
uniformly the one version allots to the period before a son and
successor is born 100 years more than the other, and to the period
subsequent 100 years less, and vice versâ, so that the totals may
agree,--and this holds true of the first, second, third, fourth,
fifth, and seventh generations,--in these cases error seems to have,
if we may say so, a certain kind of constancy, and savors not of
accident, but of design.
Accordingly, that diversity of numbers which distinguishes the Hebrew
from the Greek and Latin copies of Scripture, and which consists of a
uniform addition and deduction of 100 years in each lifetime for
several consecutive generations, is to be attributed neither to the
malice of the Jews nor to men so diligent and prudent as the seventy
translators, but to the error of the copyist who was first allowed to
transcribe the manuscript from the library of the above-mentioned
king. For even now, in cases where numbers contribute nothing to the
easier comprehension or more satisfactory knowledge of anything, they
are both carelessly transcribed, and still more carelessly emended.
For who will trouble himself to learn how many thousand men the
several tribes of Israel contained? He sees no resulting benefit of
such knowledge. Or how many men are there who are aware of the vast
advantage that lies hid in this knowledge? But in this case, in which
during so many consecutive generations 100 years are added in one
manuscript where they are not reckoned in the other, and then, after
the birth of the son and successor, the years which were wanting are
added, it is obvious that the copyist who contrived this arrangement
designed to insinuate that the antediluvians lived an excessive number
of years only because each year was excessively brief, and that he
tried to draw the attention to this fact by his statement of their age
of puberty at which they became able to beget children. For, lest the
incredulous might stumble at the difficulty of so long a lifetime, he
insinuated that 100 of their years equalled but ten of ours; and this
insinuation he conveyed by adding 100 years whenever he found the age
below 160 years or thereabouts, deducting these years again from the
period after the son's birth, that the total might harmonize. By this
means he intended to ascribe the generation of offspring to a fit age,
without diminishing the total sum of years ascribed to the lifetime of
the individuals. And the very fact that in the sixth generation he
departed from this uniform practice, inclines us all the rather to
believe that when the circumstance we have referred to required his
alterations, he made them; seeing that when this circumstance did not
exist, he made no alteration. For in the same generation he found in
the Hebrew ms., that Jared lived before he begat Enoch 162 years,
which, according to the short year computation, is sixteen years and
somewhat less than two months, an age capable of procreation; and
therefore it was not necessary to add 100 short years, and so make the
age twenty-six years of the usual length; and of course it was not
necessary to deduct, after the son's birth, years which he had not
added before it. And thus it comes to pass that in this instance
there is no variation between the two manuscripts.
This is corroborated still further by the fact that in the eighth
generation, while the Hebrew books assign 182 [809] years to
Methuselah before Lamech's birth, ours assign to him twenty less,
though usually 100 years are added to this period; then, after
Lamech's birth, the twenty years are restored, so as to equalize the
total in the two books. For if his design was that these 170 years be
understood as seventeen, so as to suit the age of puberty, as there
was no need for him adding anything, so there was none for his
subtracting anything; for in this case he found an age fit for the
generation of children, for the sake of which he was in the habit of
adding those 100 years in cases where he did not find the age already
sufficient. This difference of twenty years we might, indeed, have
supposed had happened accidentally, had he not taken care to restore
them afterwards as he had deducted them from the period before, so
that there might be no deficiency in the total. Or are we perhaps to
suppose that there was the still more astute design of concealing the
deliberate and uniform addition of 100 years to the first period and
their deduction from the subsequent period--did he design to conceal
this by doing something similar, that is to say, adding and deducting,
not indeed a century, but some years, even in a case in which there
was no need for his doing so? But whatever may be thought of this,
whether it be believed that he did so or not, whether, in fine, it be
so or not, I would have no manner of doubt that when any diversity is
found in the books, since both cannot be true to fact, we do well to
believe in preference that language out of which the translation was
made into another by translators. For there are three Greek mss., one
Latin, and one Syriac, which agree with one another, and in all of
these Methuselah is said to have died six years before the deluge.
Footnotes
[809] One hundred and eighty-seven is the number given in the Hebrew,
and one hundred and sixty-seven in the Septuagint; but notwithstanding
the confusion, the argument of Augustin is easily followed.
Chapter 14.--That the Years in Those Ancient Times Were of the Same
Length as Our Own.
Let us now see how it can be plainly made out that in the enormously
protracted lives of those men the years were not so short that ten of
their years were equal to only one of ours, but were of as great
length as our own, which are measured by the course of the sun. It is
proved by this, that Scripture states that the flood occurred in the
six hundredth year of Noah's life. But why in the same place is it
also written, "The waters of the flood were upon the earth in the six
hundredth year of Noah's life, in the second month, the twenty-seventh
day of the month," [810] if that very brief year (of which it took ten
to make one of ours) consisted of thirty-six days? For so scant a
year, if the ancient usage dignified it with the name of year, either
has not months, or this month must be three days, so that it may have
twelve of them. How then was it here said, "In the six hundredth
year, the second month, the twenty-seventh day of the month," unless
the months then were of the same length as the months now? For how
else could it be said that the flood began on the twenty-seventh day
of the second month? Then afterwards, at the end of the flood, it is
thus written: "And the ark rested in the seventh month, on the
twenty-seventh day of the month, on the mountains of Ararat. And the
waters decreased continually until the eleventh month: on the first
day of the month were the tops of the mountains seen." [811]But if
the months were such as we have, then so were the years. And
certainly months of three days each could not have a twenty-seventh
day. Or if every measure of time was diminished in proportion, and a
thirtieth part of three days was then called a day, then that great
deluge, which is recorded to have lasted forty days and forty nights,
was really over in less than four of our days. Who can away with such
foolishness and absurdity? Far be this error from us,--an error which
seeks to build up our faith in the divine Scriptures on false
conjecture only to demolish our faith at another point. It is plain
that the day then was what it now is, a space of four-and-twenty
hours, determined by the lapse of day and night; the month then equal
to the month now, which is defined by the rise and completion of one
moon; the year then equal to the year now, which is completed by
twelve lunar months, with the addition of five days and a fourth to
adjust it with the course of the sun. It was a year of this length
which was reckoned the six hundredth of Noah's life, and in the second
month, the twenty-seventh day of the month, the flood began,--a flood
which, as is recorded, was caused by heavy rains continuing for forty
days, which days had not only two hours and a little more, but
four-and-twenty hours, completing a night and a day. And consequently
those antediluvians lived more than 900 years, which were years as
long as those which afterwards Abraham lived 175 of, and after him his
son Isaac 180, and his son Jacob nearly 150, and some time after,
Moses 120, and men now seventy or eighty, or not much longer, of which
years it is said, "their strength is labor and sorrow." [812]
But that discrepancy of numbers which is found to exist between our
own and the Hebrew text does not touch the longevity of the ancients;
and if there is any diversity so great that both versions cannot be
true, we must take our ideas of the real facts from that text out of
which our own version has been translated. However, though any one
who pleases has it in his power to correct this version, yet it is not
unimportant to observe that no one has presumed to emend the
Septuagint from the Hebrew text in the many places where they seem to
disagree. For this difference has not been reckoned a falsification;
and for my own part I am persuaded it ought not to be reckoned so.
But where the difference is not a mere copyist's error, and where the
sense is agreeable to truth and illustrative of truth, we must believe
that the divine Spirit prompted them to give a varying version, not in
their function of translators, but in the liberty of prophesying. And
therefore we find that the apostles justly sanction the Septuagint, by
quoting it as well as the Hebrew when they adduce proofs from the
Scriptures. But as I have promised to treat this subject more
carefully, if God help me, in a more fitting place, I will now go on
with the matter in hand. For there can be no doubt that, the lives of
men being so long, the first-born of the first man could have built a
city,--a city, however, which was earthly, and not that which is
called the city of God, to describe which we have taken in hand this
great work.
Footnotes
[810] Gen. vii. 10, 11, (in our version the seventeenth day).
[811] Gen. viii. 4, 5.
[812] Ps. xc. 10.
Chapter 15.--Whether It is Credible that the Men of the Primitive Age
Abstained from Sexual Intercourse Until that Date at Which It is
Recorded that They Begat Children.
Some one, then, will say, Is it to be believed that a man who intended
to beget children, and had no intention of continence, abstained from
sexual intercourse a hundred years and more, or even, according to the
Hebrew version, only a little less, say eighty, seventy, or sixty
years; or, if he did not abstain, was unable to beget offspring? This
question admits of two solutions. For either puberty was so much
later as the whole life was longer, or, which seems to me more likely,
it is not the first-born sons that are here mentioned, but those whose
names were required to fill up the series until Noah was reached, from
whom again we see that the succession is continued to Abraham, and
after him down to that point of time until which it was needful to
mark by pedigree the course of the most glorious city, which sojourns
as a stranger in this world, and seeks the heavenly country. That
which is undeniable is that Cain was the first who was born of man and
woman. For had he not been the first who was added by birth to the
two unborn persons, Adam could not have said what he is recorded to
have said, "I have gotten a man by the Lord." [813]He was followed
by Abel, whom the elder brother slew, and who was the first to show by
a kind of foreshadowing of the sojourning city of God, what iniquitous
persecutions that city would suffer at the hands of wicked and, as it
were, earth-born men, who love their earthly origin, and delight in
the earthly happiness of the earthly city. But how old Adam was when
he begat these sons does not appear. After this the generations
diverge, the one branch deriving from Cain, the other from him whom
Adam begot in the room of Abel slain by his brother, and whom he
called Seth, saying, as it is written, "For God hath raised me up
another seed for Abel whom Cain slew." [814]These two series of
generations accordingly, the one of Cain, the other of Seth, represent
the two cities in their distinctive ranks, the one the heavenly city,
which sojourns on earth, the other the earthly, which gapes after
earthly joys, and grovels in them as if they were the only joys. But
though eight generations, including Adam, are registered before the
flood, no man of Cain's line has his age recorded at which the son who
succeeded him was begotten. For the Spirit of God refused to mark the
times before the flood in the generations of the earthly city, but
preferred to do so in the heavenly line, as if it were more worthy of
being remembered. Further, when Seth was born, the age of his father
is mentioned; but already he had begotten other sons, and who will
presume to say that Cain and Abel were the only ones previously
begotten? For it does not follow that they alone had been begotten of
Adam, because they alone were named in order to continue the series of
generations which it was desirable to mention. For though the names
of all the rest are buried in silence, yet it is said that Adam begot
sons and daughters; and who that cares to be free from the charge of
temerity will dare to say how many his offspring numbered? It was
possible enough that Adam was divinely prompted to say, after Seth was
born, "For God hath raised up to me another seed for Abel," because
that son was to be capable of representing Abel's holiness, not
because he was born first after him in point of time. Then because it
is written, "And Seth lived 205 years," or, according to the Hebrew
reading, "105 years, and begat Enos," [815] who but a rash man could
affirm that this was his first-born? Will any man do so to excite our
wonder, and cause us to inquire how for so many years he remained free
from sexual intercourse, though without any purpose of continuing so,
or how, if he did not abstain, he yet had no children? Will any man
do so when it is written of him, "And he begat sons and daughters, and
all the days of Seth were 912 years, and he died?" [816]And
similarly regarding those whose years are afterwards mentioned, it is
not disguised that they begat sons and daughters.
Consequently it does not at all appear whether he who is named as the
son was himself the first begotten. Nay, since it is incredible that
those fathers were either so long in attaining puberty, or could not
get wives, or could not impregnate them, it is also incredible that
those sons were their first-born. But as the writer of the sacred
history designed to descend by well-marked intervals through a series
of generations to the birth and life of Noah, in whose time the flood
occurred, he mentioned not those sons who were first begotten, but
those by whom the succession was handed down.
Let me make this clearer by here inserting an example, in regard to
which no one can have any doubt that what I am asserting is true. The
evangelist Matthew, where he designs to commit to our memories the
generation of the Lord's flesh by a series of parents, beginning from
Abraham and intending to reach David, says, "Abraham begat Isaac;"
[817] why did he not say Ishmael, whom he first begat? Then "Isaac
begat Jacob;" why did he not say Esau, who was the first-born? Simply
because these sons would not have helped him to reach David. Then
follows, "And Jacob begat Judah and his brethren:" was Judah the first
begotten? "Judah," he says, "begat Pharez and Zara;" yet neither were
these twins the first-born of Judah, but before them he had begotten
three other sons. And so in the order of the generations he retained
those by whom he might reach David, so as to proceed onwards to the
end he had in view. And from this we may understand that the
antediluvians who are mentioned were not the first-born, but those
through whom the order of the succeeding generations might be carried
on to the patriarch Noah. We need not, therefore, weary ourselves
with discussing the needless and obscure question as to their lateness
of reaching puberty.
Footnotes
[813] Gen. iv. 1.
[814] Gen. iv. 25.
[815] Gen. v. 6.
[816] Gen. v. 8.
[817] Matt. i.
Chapter 16.--Of Marriage Between Blood-Relations, in Regard to Which
the Present Law Could Not Bind the Men of the Earliest Ages.
As, therefore, the human race, subsequently to the first marriage of
the man who was made of dust, and his wife who was made out of his
side, required the union of males and females in order that it might
multiply, and as there were no human beings except those who had been
born of these two, men took their sisters for wives,--an act which was
as certainly dictated by necessity in these ancient days as afterwards
it was condemned by the prohibitions of religion. For it is very
reasonable and just that men, among whom concord is honorable and
useful, should be bound together by various relationships; and one man
should not himself sustain many relationships, but that the various
relationships should be distributed among several, and should thus
serve to bind together the greatest number in the same social
interests. "Father" and "father-in-law" are the names of two
relationships. When, therefore, a man has one person for his father,
another for his father-in-law, friendship extends itself to a larger
number. But Adam in his single person was obliged to hold both
relations to his sons and daughters, for brothers and sisters were
united in marriage. So too Eve his wife was both mother and
mother-in-law to her children of both sexes; while, had there been two
women, one the mother, the other the mother-in-law, the family
affection would have had a wider field. Then the sister herself by
becoming a wife sustained in her single person two relationships,
which, had they been distributed among individuals, one being sister,
and another being wife, the family tie would have embraced a greater
number of persons. But there was then no material for effecting this,
since there were no human beings but the brothers and sisters born of
those two first parents. Therefore, when an abundant population made
it possible, men ought to choose for wives women who were not already
their sisters; for not only would there then be no necessity for
marrying sisters, but, were it done, it would be most abominable. For
if the grandchildren of the first pair, being now able to choose their
cousins for wives, married their sisters, then it would no longer be
only two but three relationships that were held by one man, while each
of these relationships ought to have been held by a separate
individual, so as to bind together by family affection a larger
number. For one man would in that case be both father, and
father-in-law, and uncle [818] to his own children (brother and sister
now man and wife); and his wife would be mother, aunt, and
mother-in-law to them; and they themselves would be not only brother
and sister, and man and wife, but cousins also, being the children of
brother and sister. Now, all these relationships, which combined
three men into one, would have embraced nine persons had each
relationship been held by one individual, so that a man had one person
for his sister, another his wife, another his cousin, another his
father, another his uncle, another his father-in-law, another his
mother, another his aunt, another his mother-in-law; and thus the
social bond would not have been tightened to bind a few, but loosened
to embrace a larger number of relations.
And we see that, since the human race has increased and multiplied,
this is so strictly observed even among the profane worshippers of
many and false gods, that though their laws perversely allow a brother
to marry his sister, [819] yet custom, with a finer morality, prefers
to forego this license; and though it was quite allowable in the
earliest ages of the human race to marry one's sister, it is now
abhorred as a thing which no circumstances could justify. For custom
has very great power either to attract or to shock human feeling. And
in this matter, while it restrains concupiscence within due bounds,
the man who neglects and disobeys it is justly branded as abominable.
For if it is iniquitous to plough beyond our own boundaries through
the greed of gain, is it not much more iniquitous to transgress the
recognized boundaries of morals through sexual lust? And with regard
to marriage in the next degree of consanguinity, marriage between
cousins, we have observed that in our own time the customary morality
has prevented this from being frequent, though the law allows it. It
was not prohibited by divine law, nor as yet had human law prohibited
it; nevertheless, though legitimate, people shrank from it, because it
lay so close to what was illegitimate, and in marrying a cousin seemed
almost to marry a sister,--for cousins are so closely related that
they are called brothers and sisters, [820] and are almost really so.
But the ancient fathers, fearing that near relationship might
gradually in the course of generations diverge, and become distant
relationship, or cease to be relationship at all, religiously
endeavored to limit it by the bond of marriage before it became
distant, and thus, as it were, to call it back when it was escaping
them. And on this account, even when the world was full of people,
though they did not choose wives from among their sisters or
half-sisters, yet they preferred them to be of the same stock as
themselves. But who doubts that the modern prohibition of the
marriage even of cousins is the more seemly regulation--not merely on
account of the reason we have been urging, the multiplying of
relationships, so that one person might not absorb two, which might be
distributed to two persons, and so increase the number of people bound
together as a family, but also because there is in human nature I know
not what natural and praiseworthy shamefacedness which restrains us
from desiring that connection which, though for propagation, is yet
lustful and which even conjugal modesty blushes over, with any one to
whom consanguinity bids us render respect?
The sexual intercourse of man and woman, then, is in the case of
mortals a kind of seed-bed of the city; but while the earthly city
needs for its population only generation, the heavenly needs also
regeneration to rid it of the taint of generation. Whether before the
deluge there was any bodily or visible sign of regeneration, such as
was afterwards enjoined upon Abraham when he was circumcised, or what
kind of sign it was, the sacred history does not inform us. But it
does inform us that even these earliest of mankind sacrificed to God,
as appeared also in the case of the two first brothers; Noah, too, is
said to have offered sacrifices to God when he had come forth from the
ark after the deluge. And concerning this subject we have already
said in the foregoing books that the devils arrogate to themselves
divinity, and require sacrifice that they may be esteemed gods, and
delight in these honors on no other account than this, because they
know that true sacrifice is due to the true God.
Footnotes
[818] His own children being the children of his sister, and therefore
his nephews.
[819] This was allowed by the Egyptians and Athenians, never by the
Romans.
[820] Both in Hebrew, Greek, and Latin, though not uniformly, nor in
Latin commonly.
Chapter 17.--Of the Two Fathers and Leaders Who Sprang from One
Progenitor.
Since, then, Adam was the father of both lines,--the father, that is
to say, both of the line which belonged to the earthly, and of that
which belonged to the heavenly city,--when Abel was slain, and by his
death exhibited a marvellous mystery, there were henceforth two lines
proceeding from two fathers, Cain and Seth, and in those sons of
theirs, whom it behoved to register, the tokens of these two cities
began to appear more distinctly. For Cain begat Enoch, in whose name
he built a city, an earthly one, which was not from home in this
world, but rested satisfied with its temporal peace and happiness.
Cain, too, means "possession;" wherefore at his birth either his
father or mother said," I have gotten a man through God." Then Enoch
means "dedication;" for the earthly city is dedicated in this world in
which it is built, for in this world it finds the end towards which it
aims and aspires. Further, Seth signifies "resurrection," and Enos
his son signifies "man," not as Adam, which also signifies man, but is
used in Hebrew indifferently for man and woman, as it is written,
"Male and female created He them, and blessed them, and called their
name Adam," [821] leaving no room to doubt that though the woman was
distinctively called Eve, yet the name Adam, meaning man, was common
to both. But Enos means man in so restricted a sense, that Hebrew
linguists tell us it cannot be applied to woman: it is the equivalent
of the "child of the resurrection," when they neither marry nor are
given in marriage. [822]For there shall be no generation in that
place to which regeneration shall have brought us. Wherefore I think
it not immaterial to observe that in those generations which are
propagated from him who is called Seth, although daughters as well as
sons are said to have been begotten, no woman is expressly registered
by name; but in those which sprang from Cain at the very termination
to which the line runs, the last person named as begotten is a woman.
For we read, "Methusael begat Lamech. And Lamech took unto him two
wives: the name of the one was Adah, and the name of the other
Zillah. And Adah bare Jabal: he was the father of the shepherds that
dwell in tents. And his brother's name was Jubal: he was the father
of all such as handle the harp and organ. And Zillah, she also bare
Tubal-cain, an instructor of every artificer in brass and iron: and
the sister of Tubal-cain was Naamah." [823]Here terminate all the
generations of Cain, being eight in number, including Adam,--to wit,
seven from Adam to Lamech, who married two wives, and whose children,
among whom a woman also is named, form the eighth generation. Whereby
it is elegantly signified that the earthly city shall to its
termination have carnal generations proceeding from the intercourse of
males and females. And therefore the wives themselves of the man who
is the last named father of Cain's line, are registered in their own
names,--a practice nowhere followed before the deluge save in Eve's
case. Now as Cain, signifying possession, the founder of the earthly
city, and his son Enoch, meaning dedication, in whose name it was
founded, indicate that this city is earthly both in its beginning and
in its end,--a city in which nothing more is hoped for than can be
seen in this world,--so Seth, meaning resurrection, and being the
father of generations registered apart from the others, we must
consider what this sacred history says of his son.
Footnotes
[821] Gen. v. 2.
[822] Luke xx. 35, 36.
[823] Gen. iv. 18-22.
Chapter 18.--The Significance of Abel, Seth, and Enos to Christ and
His Body the Church.
"And to Seth," it is said, "there was born a son, and he called his
name Enos: he hoped to call on the name of the Lord God." [824]
Here we have a loud testimony to the truth. Man, then, the son of the
resurrection, lives in hope: he lives in hope as long as the city of
God, which is begotten by faith in the resurrection, sojourns in this
world. For in these two men, Abel, signifying "grief," and his
brother Seth, signifying "resurrection," the death of Christ and His
life from the dead are prefigured. And by faith in these is begotten
in this world the city of God, that is to say, the man who has hoped
to call on the name of the Lord. "For by hope," says the apostle, "we
are saved:but hope that is seen is not hope: for what a man seeth,
why doth he yet hope for? But if we hope for that we see not, then do
we with patience wait for it." [825]Who can avoid referring this to
a profound mystery? For did not Abel hope to call upon the name of
the Lord God when his sacrifice is mentioned in Scripture as having
been accepted by God? Did not Seth himself hope to call on the name
of the Lord God, of whom it was said, "For God hath appointed me
another seed instead of Abel?" Why then is this which is found to be
common to all the godly specially attributed to Enos, unless because
it was fit that in him, who is mentioned as the first-born of the
father of those generations which were separated to the better part of
the heavenly city, there should be a type of the man, or society of
men, who live not according to man in contentment with earthly
felicity, but according to God in hope of everlasting felicity? And
it was not said, "He hoped in the Lord God," nor "He called on the
name of the Lord God," but "He hoped to call on the name of the Lord
God." And what does this "hoped to call" mean, unless it is a
prophecy that a people should arise who, according to the election of
grace, would call on the name of the Lord God? It is this which has
been said by another prophet, and which the apostle interprets of the
people who belong to the grace of God: "And it shall be that
whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved." [826]
For these two expressions, "And he called his name Enos, which means
man," and "He hoped to call on the name of the Lord God," are
sufficient proof that man ought not to rest his hopes in himself; as
it is elsewhere written, "Cursed is the man that trusteth in man."
[827]Consequently no one ought to trust in himself that he shall
become a citizen of that other city which is not dedicated in the name
of Cain's son in this present time, that is to say, in the fleeting
course of this mortal world, but in the immortality of perpetual
blessedness.
Footnotes
[824] Gen. iv. 26.
[825] Rom. viii. 24, 25.
[826] Rom. x. 13.
[827] Jer. xvii. 5.
Chapter 19.--The Significance Of Enoch's Translation.
For that line also of which Seth is the father has the name
"Dedication" in the seventh generation from Adam, counting Adam. For
the seventh from him is Enoch, that is, Dedication. But this is that
man who was translated because he pleased God, and who held in the
order of the generations a remarkable place, being the seventh from
Adam, a number signalized by the consecration of the Sabbath. But,
counting from the diverging point of the two lines, or from Seth, he
was the sixth. Now it was on the sixth day God made man, and
consummated His works. But the translation of Enoch prefigured our
deferred dedication; for though it is indeed already accomplished in
Christ our Head, who so rose again that He shall die no more, and who
was Himself also translated, yet there remains another dedication of
the whole house, of which Christ Himself is the foundation, and this
dedication is deferred till the end, when all shall rise again to die
no more. And whether it is the house of God, or the temple of God, or
the city of God, that is said to be dedicated, it is all the same, and
equally in accordance with the usage of the Latin language. For
Virgil himself calls the city of widest empire "the house of
Assaracus," [828] meaning the Romans, who were descended through the
Trojans from Assaracus. He also calls them the house of Æneas,
because Rome was built by those Trojans who had come to Italy under
Æneas. [829]For that poet imitated the sacred writings, in which
the Hebrew nation, though so numerous, is called the house of Jacob.
Footnotes
[828] Æneid, i. 288.
[829] Æneid, iii. 97.
Chapter 20.--How It is that Cain's Line Terminates in the Eighth
Generation, While Noah, Though Descended from the Same Father, Adam,
is Found to Be the Tenth from Him.
Some one will say, If the writer of this history intended, in
enumerating the generations from Adam through his son Seth, to descend
through them to Noah, in whose time the deluge occurred, and from him
again to trace the connected generations down to Abraham, with whom
Matthew begins the pedigree of Christ the eternal King of the city of
God, what did he intend by enumerating the generations from Cain, and
to what terminus did he mean to trace them? We reply, To the deluge,
by which the whole stock of the earthly city was destroyed, but
repaired by the sons of Noah. For the earthly city and community of
men who live after the flesh will never fail until the end of this
world, of which our Lord says, "The children of this world generate,
and are generated." [830]But the city of God, which sojourns in
this world, is conducted by regeneration to the world to come, of
which the children neither generate nor are generated. In this world
generation is common to both cities; though even now the city of God
has many thousand citizens who abstain from the act of generation; yet
the other city also has some citizens who imitate these, though
erroneously. For to that city belong also those who have erred from
the faith, and introduced divers heresies; for they live according to
man, not according to God. And the Indian gymnosophists, who are said
to philosophize in the solitudes of India in a state of nudity, are
its citizens; and they abstain from marriage. For continence is not a
good thing, except when it is practised in the faith of the highest
good, that is, God. Yet no one is found to have practised it before
the deluge; for indeed even Enoch himself, the seventh from Adam, who
is said to have been translated without dying, begat sons and
daughters before he was translated, and among these was Methuselah, by
whom the succession of the recorded generations is maintained.
Why, then, is so small a number of Cain's generations registered, if
it was proper to trace them to the deluge, and if there was no such
delay of the date of puberty as to preclude the hope of offspring for
a hundred or more years? For if the author of this book had not in
view some one to whom he might rigidly trace the series of
generations, as he designed in those which sprang from Seth's seed to
descend to Noah, and thence to start again by a rigid order, what need
was there of omitting the first-born sons for the sake of descending
to Lamech, in whose sons that line terminates,--that is to say, in the
eighth generation from Adam, or the seventh from Cain,--as if from
this point he had wished to pass on to another series, by which he
might reach either the Israelitish people, among whom the earthly
Jerusalem presented a prophetic figure of the heavenly city, or to
Jesus Christ, "according to the flesh, who is over all, God blessed
for ever," [831] the Maker and Ruler of the heavenly city? What, I
say, was the need of this, seeing that the whole of Cain's posterity
were destroyed in the deluge? From this it is manifest that they are
the first-born sons who are registered in this genealogy. Why, then,
are there so few of them? Their numbers in the period before the
deluge must have been greater, if the date of puberty bore no
proportion to their longevity, and they had children before they were
a hundred years old. For supposing they were on an average thirty
years old when they began to beget children, then, as there are eight
generations, including Adam and Lamech's children, 8 times 30 gives
240 years; did they then produce no more children in all the rest of
the time before the deluge? With what intention, then, did he who
wrote this record make no mention of subsequent generations? For from
Adam to the deluge there are reckoned, according to our copies of
Scripture, 2262 years, [832] and according to the He brew text, 1656
years. Supposing, then, the smaller number to be the true one, and
subtracting from 1656 years 240, is it credible that during the
remaining 1400 and odd years until the deluge the posterity of Cain
begat no children?
But let any one who is moved by this call to mind that when I
discussed the question, how it is credible that those primitive men
could abstain for so many years from begetting children, two modes of
solution were found,--either a puberty late in proportion to their
longevity, or that the sons registered in the genealogies were not the
first-born, but those through whom the author of the book intended to
reach the point aimed at, as he intended to reach Noah by the
generations of Seth. So that, if in the generations of Cain there
occurs no one whom the writer could make it his object to reach by
omitting the first-born and inserting those who would serve such a
purpose, then we must have recourse to the supposition of late
puberty, and say that only at some age beyond a hundred years they
became capable of begetting children, so that the order of the
generations ran through the first-born, and filled up even the whole
period before the deluge, long though it was. It is, however,
possible that, for some more secret reason which escapes me, this
city, which we say is earthly, is exhibited in all its generations
down to Lamech and his sons, and that then the writer withholds from
recording the rest which may have existed before the deluge. And
without supposing so late a puberty in these men, there might be
another reason for tracing the generations by sons who were not
first-born, viz., that the same city which Cain built, and named after
his son Enoch, may have had a widely extended dominion and many kings,
not reigning simultaneously, but successively, the reigning king
begetting always his successor. Cain himself would be the first of
these kings; his son Enoch, in whose name the city in which he reigned
was built, would be the second; the third Irad, whom Enoch begat; the
fourth Mehujael, whom Irad begat; the fifth Methusael, whom Mehujael
begat; the sixth Lamech, whom Methusael begat, and who is the seventh
from Adam through Cain. But it was not necessary that the first-born
should succeed their fathers in the kingdom, but those would succeed
who were recommended by the possession of some virtue useful to the
earthly city, or who were chosen by lot, or the son who was best liked
by his father would succeed by a kind of hereditary right to the
throne. And the deluge may have happened during the lifetime and
reign of Lamech, and may have destroyed him along with all other men,
save those who were in the ark. For we cannot be surprised that,
during so long a period from Adam to the deluge, and with the ages of
individuals varying as they did, there should not be an equal number
of generations in both lines, but seven in Cain's, and ten in Seth's;
for as I have already said, Lamech is the seventh from Adam, Noah the
tenth; and in Lamech's case not one son only is registered, as in the
former instances, but more, because it was uncertain which of them
would have succeeded when he died, if there had intervened any time to
reign between his death and the deluge.
But in whatever manner the generations of Cain's line are traced
downwards, whether it be by first-born sons or by the heirs to the
throne, it seems to me that I must by no means omit to notice that,
when Lamech had been set down as the seventh from Adam, there were
named, in addition, as many of his children as made up this number to
eleven, which is the number signifying sin; for three sons and one
daughter are added. The wives of Lamech have another signification,
different from that which I am now pressing. For at present I am
speaking of the children, and not of those by whom the children were
begotten. Since, then, the law is symbolized by the number
ten,--whence that memorable Decalogue,--there is no doubt that the
number eleven, which goes beyond [833] ten, symbolizes the
transgression of the law, and consequently sin. For this reason,
eleven veils of goat's skin were ordered to be hung in the tabernacle
of the testimony, which served in the wanderings of God's people as an
ambulatory temple. And in that haircloth there was a reminder of
sins, because the goats were to be set on the left hand of the Judge;
and therefore, when we confess our sins, we prostrate ourselves in
haircloth, as if we were saying what is written in the psalm, "My sin
is ever before me." [834]The progeny of Adam, then, by Cain the
murderer, is completed in the number eleven, which symbolizes sin; and
this number itself is made up by a woman, as it was by the same sex
that beginning was made of sin by which we all die. And it was
committed that the pleasure of the flesh, which resists the spirit,
might follow; and so Naamah, the daughter of Lamech, means
"pleasure." But from Adam to Noah, in the line of Seth, there are ten
generations. And to Noah three sons are added, of whom, while one
fell into sin, two were blessed by their father; so that, if you
deduct the reprobate and add the gracious sons to the number, you get
twelve,--a number signalized in the case of the patriarchs and of the
apostles, and made up of the parts of the number seven multiplied into
one another,--for three times four, or four times three, give twelve.
These things being so, I see that I must consider and mention how
these two lines, which by their separate genealogies depict the two
cities, one of earth-born, the other of regenerated persons, became
afterwards so mixed and confused, that the whole human race, with the
exception of eight persons, deserved to perish in the deluge.
Footnotes
[830] Luke xx. 34.
[831] Rom. ix. 5.
[832] Eusebius, Jerome, Bede, and others, who follow the Septuagint,
reckon only 2242 years, which Vives explains by supposing Augustin to
have made a copyist's error.
[833] Transgreditur.
[834] Ps. li. 3.
Chapter 21.--Why It is That, as Soon as Cain's Son Enoch Has Been
Named, the Genealogy is Forthwith Continued as Far as the Deluge,
While After the Mention of Enos, Seth's Son, the Narrative Returns
Again to the Creation of Man.
We must first see why, in the enumeration of Cain's posterity, after
Enoch, in whose name the city was built, has been first of all
mentioned, the rest are at once enumerated down to that terminus of
which I have spoken, and at which that race and the whole line was
destroyed in the deluge; while, after Enos the son of Seth, has been
mentioned, the rest are not at once named down to the deluge, but a
clause is inserted to the following effect: "This is the book of the
generations of Adam. In the day that God created man, in the likeness
of God made He him; male and female created He them; and blessed them,
and called their name Adam, in the day when they were created." [835]
This seems to me to be inserted for this purpose, that here again
the reckoning of the times may start from Adam himself--a purpose
which the writer had not in view in speaking of the earthly city, as
if God mentioned it, but did not take account of its duration. But
why does he return to this recapitulation after mentioning the son of
Seth, the man who hoped to call on the name of the Lord God, unless
because it was fit thus to present these two cities, the one beginning
with a murderer and ending in a murderer (for Lamech, too,
acknowledges to his two wives that he had committed murder), the other
built up by him who hoped to call upon the name of the Lord God? For
the highest and complete terrestrial duty of the city of God, which is
a stranger in this world, is that which was exemplified in the
individual who was begotten by him who typified the resurrection of
the murdered Abel. That one man is the unity of the whole heavenly
city, not yet indeed complete, but to be completed, as this prophetic
figure foreshows. The son of Cain, therefore, that is, the son of
possession (and of what but an earthly possession?), may have a name
in the earthly city which was built in his name. It is of such the
Psalmist says, "They call their lands after their own names." [836]
Wherefore they incur what is written in another psalm: "Thou, O Lord,
in Thy city wilt despise their image." [837]But as for the son of
Seth, the son of the resurrection, let him hope to call on the name of
the Lord God. For he prefigures that society of men which says, "But
I am like a green olive-tree in the house of God: I have trusted in
the mercy of God." [838]But let him not seek the empty honors of a
famous name upon earth, for "Blessed is the man that maketh the name
of the Lord his trust, and respecteth not vanities nor lying follies."
[839]After having presented the two cities, the one founded in the
material good of this world, the other in hope in God, but both
starting from a common gate opened in Adam into this mortal state, and
both running on and running out to their proper and merited ends,
Scripture begins to reckon the times, and in this reckoning includes
other generations, making a recapitulation from Adam, out of whose
condemned seed, as out of one mass handed over to merited damnation,
God made some vessels of wrath to dishonor and others vessels of mercy
to honor; in punishment rendering to the former what is due, in grace
giving to the latter what is not due: in order that by the very
comparison of itself with the vessels of wrath, the heavenly city,
which sojourns on earth, may learn not to put confidence in the
liberty of its own will, but may hope to call on the name of the Lord
God. For will, being a nature which was made good by the good God,
but mutable by the immutable, because it was made out of nothing, can
both decline from good to do evil, which takes place when it freely
chooses, and can also escape the evil and do good, which takes place
only by divine assistance.
Footnotes
[835] Gen. v. 1.
[836] Ps. xlix. 11.
[837] Ps. lxxiii. 20.
[838] Ps. lii. 8.
[839] Ps. xl. 4.
Chapter 22.--Of the Fall of the Sons of God Who Were Captivated by the
Daughters of Men, Whereby All, with the Exception of Eight Persons,
Deservedly Perished in the Deluge.
When the human race, in the exercise of this freedom of will,
increased and advanced, there arose a mixture and confusion of the two
cities by their participation in a common iniquity. And this
calamity, as well as the first, was occasioned by woman, though not in
the same way; for these women were not themselves betrayed, neither
did they persuade the men to sin, but having belonged to the earthly
city and society of the earthly, they had been of corrupt manners from
the first, and were loved for their bodily beauty by the sons of God,
or the citizens of the other city which sojourns in this world.
Beauty is indeed a good gift of God; but that the good may not think
it a great good, God dispenses it even to the wicked. And thus, when
the good that is great and proper to the good was abandoned by the
sons of God, they fell to a paltry good which is not peculiar to the
good, but common to the good and the evil; and when they were
captivated by the daughters of men, they adopted the manners of the
earthly to win them as their brides, and forsook the godly ways they
had followed in their own holy society. And thus beauty, which is
indeed God's handiwork, but only a temporal, carnal, and lower kind of
good, is not fitly loved in preference to God, the eternal, spiritual,
and unchangeable good. When the miser prefers his gold to justice, it
is through no fault of the gold, but of the man; and so with every
created thing. For though it be good, it may be loved with an evil as
well as with a good love: it is loved rightly when it is loved
ordinately; evilly, when inordinately. It is this which some one has
briefly said in these verses in praise of the Creator: [840]"These
are Thine, they are good, because Thou art good who didst create
them. There is in them nothing of ours, unless the sin we commit when
we forget the order of things, and instead of Thee love that which
Thou hast made."
But if the Creator is truly loved, that is, if He Himself is loved and
not another thing in His stead, He cannot be evilly loved; for love
itself is to be ordinately loved, because we do well to love that
which, when we love it, makes us live well and virtuously. So that it
seems to me that it is a brief but true definition of virtue to say,
it is the order of love; and on this account, in the Canticles, the
bride of Christ, the city of God, sings, "Order love within me." [841]
It was the order of this love, then, this charity or attachment,
which the sons of God disturbed when they forsook God, and were
enamored of the daughters of men. [842]And by these two names (sons
of God and daughters of men) the two cities are sufficiently
distinguished. For though the former were by nature children of men,
they had come into possession of another name by grace. For in the
same Scripture in which the sons of God are said to have loved the
daughters of men, they are also called angels of God; whence many
suppose that they were not men but angels.
Footnotes
[840] Or, according to another reading, "Which I briefly said in these
verses in praise of a taper."
[841] Cant. ii. 4.
[842] See De Doct. Christ. i. 28.
Chapter 23.--Whether We are to Believe that Angels, Who are of a
Spiritual Substance, Fell in Love with the Beauty of Women, and Sought
Them in Marriage, and that from This Connection Giants Were Born.
In the third book of this work (c. 5) we made a passing reference to
this question, but did not decide whether angels, inasmuch as they are
spirits, could have bodily intercourse with women. For it is written,
"Who maketh His angels spirits," [843] that is, He makes those who are
by nature spirits His angels by appointing them to the duty of bearing
His messages. For the Greek word angelos, which in Latin appears as
"angelus," means a messenger. But whether the Psalmist speaks of
their bodies when he adds, "and His ministers a flaming fire," or
means that God's ministers ought to blaze with love as with a
spiritual fire, is doubtful. However, the same trustworthy Scripture
testifies that angels have appeared to men in such bodies as could not
only be seen, but also touched. There is, too, a very general rumor,
which many have verified by their own experience, or which trustworthy
persons who have heard the experience of others corroborate, that
sylvans and fauns, who are commonly called "incubi," had often made
wicked assaults upon women, and satisfied their lust upon them; and
that certain devils, called Duses by the Gauls, are constantly
attempting and effecting this impurity is so generally affirmed, that
it were impudent to deny it. [844]From these assertions, indeed, I
dare not determine whether there be some spirits embodied in an aerial
substance (for this element, even when agitated by a fan, is sensibly
felt by the body), and who are capable of lust and of mingling
sensibly with women; but certainly I could by no means believe that
God's holy angels could at that time have so fallen, nor can I think
that it is of them the Apostle Peter said, "For if God spared not the
angels that sinned, but cast them down to hell, and delivered them
into chains of darkness, to be reserved unto judgment." [845]I
think he rather speaks of these who first apostatized from God, along
with their chief the devil, who enviously deceived the first man under
the form of a serpent. But the same holy Scripture affords the most
ample testimony that even godly men have been called angels; for of
John it is written: "Behold, I send my messenger (angel) before Thy
face, who shall prepare Thy way." [846]And the prophet Malachi, by
a peculiar grace specially communicated to him, was called an angel.
[847]
But some are moved by the fact that we have read that the fruit of the
connection between those who are called angels of God and the women
they loved were not men like our own breed, but giants; just as if
there were not born even in our own time (as I have mentioned above)
men of much greater size than the ordinary stature. Was there not at
Rome a few years ago, when the destruction of the city now
accomplished by the Goths was drawing near, a woman, with her father
and mother, who by her gigantic size over-topped all others?
Surprising crowds from all quarters came to see her, and that which
struck them most was the circumstance that neither of her parents were
quite up to the tallest ordinary stature. Giants therefore might well
be born, even before the sons of God, who are also called angels of
God, formed a connection with the daughters of men, or of those living
according to men, that is to say, before the sons of Seth formed a
connection with the daughters of Cain. For thus speaks even the
canonical Scripture itself in the book in which we read of this; its
words are: "And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the
face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them, that the sons of
God saw the daughters of men that they were fair [good]; and they took
them wives of all which they chose. And the Lord God said, My Spirit
shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his
days shall be an hundred and twenty years. There were giants in the
earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in
unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same
became the giants, men of renown." [848]These words of the divine
book sufficiently indicate that already there were giants in the earth
in those days, in which the sons of God took wives of the children of
men, when they loved them because they were good, that is, fair. For
it is the custom of this Scripture to call those who are beautiful in
appearance "good." But after this connection had been formed, then
too were giants born. For the words are: "There were giants in the
earth in those days, and also after that, when the sons of God came in
unto the daughters of men." Therefore there were giants both before,
"in those days," and "also after that." And the words, "they bare
children to them," show plainly enough that before the sons of God
fell in this fashion they begat children to God, not to
themselves,--that is to say, not moved by the lust of sexual
intercourse, but discharging the duty of propagation, intending to
produce not a family to gratify their own pride, but citizens to
people the city of God; and to these they as God's angels would bear
the message, that they should place their hope in God, like him who
was born of Seth, the son of resurrection, and who hoped to call on
the name of the Lord God, in which hope they and their offspring would
be co-heirs of eternal blessings, and brethren in the family of which
God is the Father.
But that those angels were not angels in the sense of not being men,
as some suppose, Scripture itself decides, which unambiguously
declares that they were men. For when it had first been stated that
"the angels of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair, and
they took them wives of all which they chose," it was immediately
added, "And the Lord God said, My Spirit shall not always strive with
these men, for that they also are flesh." For by the Spirit of God
they had been made angels of God, and sons of God; but declining
towards lower things, they are called men, a name of nature, not of
grace; and they are called flesh, as deserters of the Spirit, and by
their desertion deserted [by Him]. The Septuagint indeed calls them
both angels of God and sons of God, though all the copies do not show
this, some having only the name" sons of God." And Aquila, whom the
Jews prefer to the other interpreters, [849] has translated neither
angels of God nor sons of God, but sons of gods. But both are
correct. For they were both sons of God, and thus brothers of their
own fathers, who were children of the same God; and they were sons of
gods, because begotten by gods, together with whom they themselves
also were gods, according to that expression of the psalm: "I have
said, Ye are gods, and all of you are children of the Most High."
[850]For the Septuagint translators are justly believed to have
received the Spirit of prophecy; so that, if they made any alterations
under His authority, and did not adhere to a strict translation, we
could not doubt that this was divinely dictated. However, the Hebrew
word may be said to be ambiguous, and to be susceptible of either
translation, "sons of God," or "sons of gods."
Let us omit, then, the fables of those scriptures which are called
apocryphal, because their obscure origin was unknown to the fathers
from whom the authority of the true Scriptures has been transmitted to
us by a most certain and well-ascertained succession. For though
there is some truth in these apocryphal writings, yet they contain so
many false statements, that they have no canonical authority. We
cannot deny that Enoch, the seventh from Adam, left some divine
writings, for this is asserted by the Apostle Jude in his canonical
epistle. But it is not without reason that these writings have no
place in that canon of Scripture which was preserved in the temple of
the Hebrew people by the diligence of successive priests; for their
antiquity brought them under suspicion, and it was impossible to
ascertain whether these were his genuine writings, and they were not
brought forward as genuine by the persons who were found to have
carefully preserved the canonical books by a successive transmission.
So that the writings which are produced under his name, and which
contain these fables about the giants, saying that their fathers were
not men, are properly judged by prudent men to be not genuine; just as
many writings are produced by heretics under the names both of other
prophets, and more recently, under the names of the apostles, all of
which, after careful examination, have been set apart from canonical
authority under the title of Apocrypha. There is therefore no doubt
that, according to the Hebrew and Christian canonical Scriptures,
there were many giants before the deluge, and that these were citizens
of the earthly society of men, and that the sons of God, who were
according to the flesh the sons of Seth, sunk into this community when
they forsook righteousness. Nor need we wonder that giants should be
born even from these. For all of their children were not giants; but
there were more then than in the remaining periods since the deluge.
And it pleased the Creator to produce them, that it might thus be
demonstrated that neither beauty, nor yet size and strength, are of
much moment to the wise man, whose blessedness lies in spiritual and
immortal blessings, in far better and more enduring gifts, in the good
things that are the peculiar property of the good, and are not shared
by good and bad alike. It is this which another prophet confirms when
he says, "These were the giants, famous from the beginning, that were
of so great stature, and so expert in war. Those did not the Lord
choose, neither gave He the way of knowledge unto them; but they were
destroyed because they had no wisdom, and perished through their own
foolishness." [851]
Footnotes
[843] Ps. civ. 4.
[844] On these kinds of devils, see the note of Vives in loc., or
Lecky's Hist. of Rationalism, i. 26, who quotes from Maury's Histoire
de la Magie, that the Dusii were Celtic spirits, and are the origin of
our "Deuce."
[845] 2 Pet. ii. 4.
[846] Mark i. 2.
[847] Mal. ii. 7.
[848] Gen. vi. 1-4. Lactantius (Inst. ii. 15), Sulpicius Severus
(Hist. i. 2), and others suppose from this passage that angels had
commerce with the daughters of men. See further references in the
commentary of Pererius in loc.
[849] Aquila lived in the time of Hadrian, to whom he is said to have
been related. He was excommunicated from the Church for the practice
of astrology; and is best known by his translation of the Hebrew
Scriptures into Greek, which he executed with great care and accuracy,
though he has been charged with falsifying passages to support the
Jews in their opposition to Christianity.
[850] Ps. lxxxii. 6.
[851] Baruch iii. 26-28.
Chapter 24.--How We are to Understand This Which the Lord Said to
Those Who Were to Perish in the Flood: "Their Days Shall Be 120
Years."
But that which God said, "Their days shall be a hundred and twenty
years," is not to be understood as a prediction that henceforth men
should not live longer than 120 years,--for even after the deluge we
find that they lived more than 500 years,--but we are to understand
that God said this when Noah had nearly completed his fifth century,
that is, had lived 480 years, which Scripture, as it frequently uses
the name of the whole of the largest part, calls 500 years. Now the
deluge came in the 600th year of Noah's life, the second month; and
thus 120 years were predicted as being the remaining span of those who
were doomed, which years being spent, they should be destroyed by the
deluge. And it is not unreasonably believed that the deluge came as
it did, because already there were not found upon earth any who were
not worthy of sharing a death so manifestly judicial,--not that a good
man, who must die some time, would be a jot the worse of such a death
after it was past. Nevertheless there died in the deluge none of
those mentioned in the sacred Scripture as descended from Seth. But
here is the divine account of the cause of the deluge: "The Lord God
saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every
imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.
And it repented [852] the Lord that He had made man on the earth, and
it grieved Him at His heart. And the Lord said, I will destroy man,
whom I have created, from the face of the earth; both man and beast,
and the creeping thing, and the fowls of the air: for I am angry that
I have made them." [853]
Footnotes
[852] Lit.: The Lord thought and reconsidered.
[853] Gen. vi. 5-7.
Chapter 25.--Of the Anger of God, Which Does Not Inflame His Mind, Nor
Disturb His Unchangeable Tranquillity.
The anger of God is not a disturbing emotion of His mind, but a
judgment by which punishment is inflicted upon sin. His thought and
reconsideration also are the unchangeable reason which changes things;
for He does not, like man, repent of anything He has done, because in
all matters His decision is as inflexible as His prescience is
certain. But if Scripture were not to use such expressions as the
above, it would not familiarly insinuate itself into the minds of all
classes of men, whom it seeks access to for their good, that it may
alarm the proud, arouse the careless, exercise the inquisitive, and
satisfy the intelligent; and this it could not do, did it not first
stoop, and in a manner descend, to them where they lie. But its
denouncing death on all the animals of earth and air is a declaration
of the vastness of the disaster that was approaching: not that it
threatens destruction to the irrational animals as if they too had
incurred it by sin.
Chapter 26.--That the Ark Which Noah Was Ordered to Make Figures In
Every Respect Christ and the Church.
Moreover, inasmuch as God commanded Noah, a just man, and, as the
truthful Scripture says, a man perfect in his generation,--not indeed
with the perfection of the citizens of the city of God in that
immortal condition in which they equal the angels, but in so far as
they can be perfect in their sojourn in this world,--inasmuch as God
commanded him, I say, to make an ark, in which he might be rescued
from the destruction of the flood, along with his family, i.e., his
wife, sons, and daughters-in-law, and along with the animals who, in
obedience to God's command, came to him into the ark: this is
certainly a figure of the city of God sojourning in this world; that
is to say, of the church, which is rescued by the wood on which hung
the Mediator of God and men, the man Christ Jesus. [854]For even
its very dimensions, in length, breadth, and height, represent the
human body in which He came, as it had been foretold. For the length
of the human body, from the crown of the head to the sole of the foot,
is six times its breadth from side to side, and ten times its depth or
thickness, measuring from back to front: that is to say, if you
measure a man as he lies on his back or on his face, he is six times
as long from head to foot as he is broad from side to side, and ten
times as long as he is high from the ground. And therefore the ark
was made 300 cubits in length, 50 in breadth, and 30 in height. And
its having a door made in the side of it certainly signified the wound
which was made when the side of the Crucified was pierced with the
spear; for by this those who come to Him enter; for thence flowed the
sacraments by which those who believe are initiated. And the fact
that it was ordered to be made of squared timbers, signifies the
immoveable steadiness of the life of the saints; for however you turn
a cube, it still stands. And the other peculiarities of the ark's
construction are signs of features of the church.
But we have not now time to pursue this subject; and, indeed, we have
already dwelt upon it in the work we wrote against Faustus the
Manichean, who denies that there is anything prophesied of Christ in
the Hebrew books. It may be that one man's exposition excels
another's, and that ours is not the best; but all that is said must be
referred to this city of God we speak of, which sojourns in this
wicked world as in a deluge, at least if the expositor would not
widely miss the meaning of the author. For example, the
interpretation I have given in the work against Faustus, of the words,
"with lower, second, and third stories shalt thou make it," is, that
because the church is gathered out of all nations, it is said to have
two stories, to represent the two kinds of men,--the circumcision, to
wit, and the uncircumcision, or, as the apostle otherwise calls them,
Jews and Gentiles; and to have three stories, because all the nations
were replenished from the three sons of Noah. Now any one may object
to this interpretation, and may give another which harmonizes with the
rule of faith. For as the ark was to have rooms not only on the
lower, but also on the upper stories, which were called "third
stories," that there might be a habitable space on the third floor
from the basement, some one may interpret these to mean the three
graces commended by the apostle.--faith, hope, and charity. Or even
more suitably they may be supposed to represent those three harvests
in the gospel, thirty-fold, sixty-fold, an hundred-fold,--chaste
marriage dwelling in the ground floor, chaste widowhood in the upper,
and chaste virginity in the top story. Or any better interpretation
may be given, so long as the reference to this city is maintained.
And the same statement I would make of all the remaining particulars
in this passage which require exposition, viz., that although
different explanations are given, yet they must all agree with the one
harmonious catholic faith.
Footnotes
[854] 1 Tim. ii. 5.
Chapter 27.--Of the Ark and the Deluge, and that We Cannot Agree with
Those Who Receive the Bare History, But Reject the Allegorical
Interpretation, Nor with Those Who Maintain the Figurative and Not the
Historical Meaning.
Yet no one ought to suppose either that these things were written for
no purpose, or that we should study only the historical truth, apart
from any allegorical meanings; or, on the contrary, that they are only
allegories, and that there were no such facts at all, or that, whether
it be so or no, there is here no prophecy of the church. For what
right-minded man will contend that books so religiously preserved
during thousands of years, and transmitted by so orderly a succession,
were written without an object, or that only the bare historical facts
are to be considered when we read them? For, not to mention other
instances, if the number of the animals entailed the construction of
an ark of great size, where was the necessity of sending into it two
unclean and seven clean animals of each species, when both could have
been preserved in equal numbers? Or could not God, who ordered them
to be preserved in order to replenish the race, restore them in the
same way He had created them?
But they who contend that these things never happened, but are only
figures setting forth other things, in the first place suppose that
there could not be a flood so great that the water should rise fifteen
cubits above the highest mountains, because it is said that clouds
cannot rise above the top of Mount Olympus, because it reaches the sky
where there is none of that thicker atmosphere in which winds, clouds,
and rains have their origin. They do not reflect that the densest
element of all, earth, can exist there; or perhaps they deny that the
top of the mountain is earth. Why, then, do these measurers and
weighers of the elements contend that earth can be raised to those
aerial altitudes, and that water cannot, while they admit that water
is lighter, and liker to ascend than earth? What reason do they
adduce why earth, the heavier and lower element, has for so many ages
scaled to the tranquil ether, while water, the lighter, and more
likely to ascend, is not suffered to do the same even for a brief
space of time?
They say, too, that the area of that ark could not contain so many
kinds of animals of both sexes, two of the unclean and seven of the
clean. But they seem to me to reckon only one area of 300 cubits long
and 50 broad, and not to remember that there was another similar in
the story above, and yet another as large in the story above that
again; and that there was consequently an area of 900 cubits by 150.
And if we accept what Origen [855] has with some appropriateness
suggested, that Moses the man of God, being, as it is written,
"learned in all the wisdom of the Egyptians," [856] who delighted in
geometry, may have meant geometrical cubits, of which they say that
one is equal to six of our cubits, then who does not see what a
capacity these dimensions give to the ark? For as to their objection
that an ark of such size could not be built, it is a very silly
calumny; for they are aware that huge cities have been built, and they
should remember that the ark was an hundred years in building. Or,
perhaps, though stone can adhere to stone when cemented with nothing
but lime, so that a wall of several miles may be constructed, yet
plank cannot be riveted to plank by mortices, bolts, nails, and
pitch-glue, so as to construct an ark which was not made with curved
ribs but straight timbers, which was not to be launched by its
builders, but to be lifted by the natural pressure of the water when
it reached it, and which was to be preserved from shipwreck as it
floated about rather by divine oversight than by human skill.
As to another customary inquiry of the scrupulous about the very
minute creatures, not only such as mice and lizards, but also locusts,
beetles, flies, fleas, and so forth, whether there were not in the ark
a larger number of them than was determined by God in His command,
those persons who are moved by this difficulty are to be reminded that
the words "every creeping thing of the earth" only indicate that it
was not needful to preserve in the ark the animals that can live in
the water, whether the fishes that live submerged in it, or the
sea-birds that swim on its surface. Then, when it is said "male and
female," no doubt reference is made to the repairing of the races, and
consequently there was no need for those creatures being in the ark
which are born without the union of the sexes from inanimate things,
or from their corruption; or if they were in the ark, they might be
there as they commonly are in houses, not in any determinate numbers;
or if it was necessary that there should be a definite number of all
those animals that cannot naturally live in the water, that so the
most sacred mystery which was being enacted might be bodied forth and
perfectly figured in actual realities, still this was not the care of
Noah or his sons, but of God. For Noah did not catch the animals and
put them into the ark, but gave them entrance as they came seeking
it. For this is the force of the words, "They shall come unto thee,"
[857] --not, that is to say, by man's effort, but by God's will. But
certainly we are not required to believe that those which have no sex
also came; for it is expressly and definitely said, "They shall be
male and female." For there are some animals which are born out of
corruption, but yet afterwards they themselves copulate and produce
offspring, as flies; but others, which have no sex, like bees. Then,
as to those animals which have sex, but without ability to propagate
their kind, like mules and she-mules, it is probable that they were
not in the ark, but that it was counted sufficient to preserve their
parents, to wit, the horse and the ass; and this applies to all
hybrids. Yet, if it was necessary for the completeness of the
mystery, they were there; for even this species has "male and female."
Another question is commonly raised regarding the food of the
carnivorous animals,--whether, without transgressing the command which
fixed the number to be preserved, there were necessarily others
included in the ark for their sustenance; or, as is more probable,
there might be some food which was not flesh, and which yet suited
all. For we know how many animals whose food is flesh eat also
vegetable products and fruits, especially figs and chestnuts. What
wonder is it, therefore, if that wise and just man was instructed by
God what would suit each, so that without flesh he prepared and stored
provision fit for every species? And what is there which hunger would
not make animals eat? Or what could not be made sweet and wholesome
by God, who, with a divine facility, might have enabled them to do
without food at all, had it not been requisite to the completeness of
so great a mystery that they should be fed? But none but a
contentious man can suppose that there was no prefiguring of the
church in so manifold and circumstantial a detail. For the nations
have already so filled the church, and are comprehended in the
framework of its unity, the clean and unclean together, until the
appointed end, that this one very manifest fulfillment leaves no doubt
how we should interpret even those others which are somewhat more
obscure, and which cannot so readily be discerned. And since this is
so, if not even the most audacious will presume to assert that these
things were written without a purpose, or that though the events
really happened they mean nothing, or that they did not really happen,
but are only allegory, or that at all events they are far from having
any figurative reference to the church; if it has been made out that,
on the other hand, we must rather believe that there was a wise
purpose in their being committed to memory and to writing, and that
they did happen, and have a significance, and that this significance
has a prophetic reference to the church, then this book, having served
this purpose, may now be closed, that we may go on to trace in the
history subsequent to the deluge the courses of the two cities,--the
earthly, that lives according to men, and the heavenly, that lives
according to God.
Footnotes
[855] In his second homily on Genesis.
[856] Acts vii. 22.
[857] Gen. vi. 19, 20.
.
Book XVI.
Argument--In the former part of this book, from the first to the
twelfth chapter, the progress of the two cities, the earthly and the
heavenly, from Noah to Abraham, is exhibited from Holy Scripture: In
the latter part, the progress of the heavenly alone, from Abraham to
the kings of Israel, is the subject.
Chapter 1.--Whether, After the Deluge, from Noah to Abraham, Any
Families Can Be Found Who Lived According to God.
It is difficult to discover from Scripture, whether, after the deluge,
traces of the holy city are continuous, or are so interrupted by
intervening seasons of godlessness, that not a single worshipper of
the one true God was found among men; because from Noah, who, with his
wife, three sons, and as many daughters-in-law, achieved deliverance
in the ark from the destruction of the deluge, down to Abraham, we do
not find in the canonical books that the piety of any one is
celebrated by express divine testimony, unless it be in the case of
Noah, who commends with a prophetic benediction his two sons Shem and
Japheth, while he beheld and foresaw what was long afterwards to
happen. It was also by this prophetic spirit that, when his middle
son--that is, the son who was younger than the first and older than
the last born--had sinned against him, he cursed him not in his own
person, but in his son's (his own grandson's), in the words, "Cursed
be the lad Canaan; a servant shall he be unto his brethren." [858]
Now Canaan was born of Ham, who, so far from covering his sleeping
father's nakedness, had divulged it. For the same reason also he
subjoins the blessing on his two other sons, the oldest and youngest,
saying, "Blessed be the Lord God of Shem; and Canaan shall be his
servant. God shall gladden Japheth, and he shall dwell in the houses
of Shem." [859]And so, too, the planting of the vine by Noah, and
his intoxication by its fruit, and his nakedness while he slept, and
the other things done at that time, and recorded, are all of them
pregnant with prophetic meanings, and veiled in mysteries. [860]
Footnotes
[858] Gen. ix. 25.
[859] Gen. ix. 26, 27.
[860] See Contra Faust. xii. c. 22 sqq.
Chapter 2.--What Was Prophetically Prefigured in the Sons of Noah.
The things which then were hidden are now sufficiently revealed by the
actual events which have followed. For who can carefully and
intelligently consider these things without recognizing them
accomplished in Christ? Shem, of whom Christ was born in the flesh,
means "named." And what is of greater name than Christ, the fragrance
of whose name is now everywhere perceived, so that even prophecy sings
of it beforehand, comparing it in the Song of Songs, [861] to ointment
poured forth? Is it not also in the houses of Christ, that is, in the
churches, that the "enlargement" of the nations dwells? For Japheth
means "enlargement." And Ham (i.e., hot), who was the middle son of
Noah, and, as it were, separated himself from both, and remained
between them, neither belonging to the first-fruits of Israel nor to
the fullness of the Gentiles, what does he signify but the tribe of
heretics, hot with the spirit, not of patience, but of impatience,
with which the breasts of heretics are wont to blaze, and with which
they disturb the peace of the saints? But even the heretics yield an
advantage to those that make proficiency, according to the apostle's
saying, "There must also be heresies, that they which are approved may
be made manifest among you." [862]Whence, too, it is elsewhere
said, "The son that receives instruction will be wise, and he uses the
foolish as his servant." [863]For while the hot restlessness of
heretics stirs questions about many articles of the catholic faith,
the necessity of defending them forces us both to investigate them
more accurately, to understand them more clearly, and to proclaim them
more earnestly; and the question mooted by an adversary becomes the
occasion of instruction. However, not only those who are openly
separated from the church, but also all who glory in the Christian
name, and at the same time lead abandoned lives, may without absurdity
seem to be figured by Noah's middle son: for the passion of Christ,
which was signified by that man's nakedness, is at once proclaimed by
their profession, and dishonored by their wicked conduct. Of such,
therefore, it has been said, "By their fruits ye shall know them."
[864]And therefore was Ham cursed in his son, he being, as it were,
his fruit. So, too, this son of his, Canaan, is fitly interpreted
"their movement," which is nothing else than their work. But Shem and
Japheth, that is to say, the circumcision and uncircumcision, or, as
the apostle otherwise calls them, the Jews and Greeks, but called and
justified, having somehow discovered the nakedness of their father
(which signifies the Saviour's passion), took a garment and laid it
upon their backs, and entered backwards and covered their father's
nakedness, without their seeing what their reverence hid. For we both
honor the passion of Christ as accomplished for us, and we hate the
crime of the Jews who crucified Him. The garment signifies the
sacrament, their backs the memory of things past: for the church
celebrates the passion of Christ as already accomplished, and no
longer to be looked forward to, now that Japheth already dwells in the
habitations of Shem, and their wicked brother between them.
But the wicked brother is, in the person of his son (i.e., his work),
the boy, or slave, of his good brothers, when good men make a skillful
use of bad men, either for the exercise of their patience or for their
advancement in wisdom. For the apostle testifies that there are some
who preach Christ from no pure motives; "but," says he, "whether in
pretence or in truth, Christ is preached; and I therein do rejoice,
yea, and will rejoice." [865]For it is Christ Himself who planted
the vine of which the prophet says, "The vine of the Lord of hosts is
the house of Israel;" [866] and He drinks of its wine, whether we thus
understand that cup of which He says, "Can ye drink of the cup that I
shall drink of?" [867] and, "Father, if it be possible, let this cup
pass from me," [868] by which He obviously means His passion. Or, as
wine is the fruit of the vine, we may prefer to understand that from
this vine, that is to say, from the race of Israel, He has assumed
flesh and blood that He might suffer; "and he was drunken," that is,
He suffered; "and was naked," that is, His weakness appeared in His
suffering, as the apostle says, "though He was crucified through
weakness." [869]Wherefore the same apostle says, "The weakness of
God is stronger than men; and the foolishness of God is wiser than
men." [870]And when to the expression "he was naked" Scripture adds
"in his house," it elegantly intimates that Jesus was to suffer the
cross and death at the hands of His own household, His own kith and
kin, the Jews. This passion of Christ is only externally and verbally
professed by the reprobate, for what they profess, they do not
understand. But the elect hold in the inner man this so great
mystery, and honor inwardly in the heart this weakness and foolishness
of God. And of this there is a figure in Ham going out to proclaim
his father's nakedness; while Shem and Japheth, to cover or honor it,
went in, that is to say, did it inwardly.
These secrets of divine Scripture we investigate as well as we can.
All will not accept our interpretation with equal confidence, but all
hold it certain that these things were neither done nor recorded
without some foreshadowing of future events, and that they are to be
referred only to Christ and His church, which is the city of God,
proclaimed from the very beginning of human history by figures which
we now see everywhere accomplished. From the blessing of the two sons
of Noah, and the cursing of the middle son, down to Abraham, or for
more than a thousand years, there is, as I have said, no mention of
any righteous persons who worshipped God. I do not therefore conclude
that there were none; but it had been tedious to mention every one,
and would have displayed historical accuracy rather than prophetic
foresight. The object of the writer of these sacred books, or rather
of the Spirit of God in him, is not only to record the past, but to
depict the future, so far as it regards the city of God; for whatever
is said of those who are not its citizens, is given either for her
instruction, or as a foil to enhance her glory. Yet we are not to
suppose that all that is recorded has some signification; but those
things which have no signification of their own are interwoven for the
sake of the things which are significant. It is only the ploughshare
that cleaves the soil; but to effect this, other parts of the plough
are requisite. It is only the strings in harps and other musical
instruments which produce melodious sounds; but that they may do so,
there are other parts of the instrument which are not indeed struck by
those who sing, but are connected with the strings which are struck,
and produce musical notes. So in this prophetic history some things
are narrated which have no significance, but are, as it were, the
framework to which the significant things are attached.
Footnotes
[861] Song of Solomon i. 3.
[862] 1 Cor. xi. 19.
[863] Prov. x. 5. (LXX.).
[864] Matt. vii. 20.
[865] Phil. i. 18.
[866] Isa. v. 7.
[867] Matt. xx. 22.
[868] Matt. xxvi. 39.
[869] 2 Cor xiii. 4.
[870] 1 Cor. i. 25.
Chapter 3.--Of the Generations of the Three Sons of Noah.
We must therefore introduce into this work an explanation of the
generations of the three sons of Noah, in so far as that may
illustrate the progress in time of the two cities. Scripture first
mentions that of the youngest son, who is called Japheth: he had
eight sons, [871] and by two of these sons seven grandchildren, three
by one son, four by the other; in all, fifteen descendants. Ham,
Noah's middle son, had four sons, and by one of them five grandsons,
and by one of these two great-grandsons; in all, eleven. After
enumerating these, Scripture returns to the first of the sons, and
says, "Cush begat Nimrod; he began to be a giant on the earth. He was
a giant hunter against the Lord God: wherefore they say, As Nimrod
the giant hunter against the Lord. And the beginning of his kingdom
was Babylon, Erech, Accad, and Calneh, in the land of Shinar. Out of
that land went forth Assur, and built Nineveh, and the city Rehoboth,
and Calah, and Resen between Nineveh and Calah: this was a great
city." Now this Cush, father of the giant Nimrod, is the first-named
among the sons of Ham, to whom five sons and two grandsons are
ascribed. But he either begat this giant after his grandsons were
born, or, which is more credible, Scripture speaks of him separately
on account of his eminence; for mention is also made of his kingdom,
which began with that magnificent city Babylon, and the other places,
whether cities or districts, mentioned along with it. But what is
recorded of the land of Shinar which belonged to Nimrod's kingdom, to
wit, that Assur went forth from it and built Nineveh and the other
cities mentioned with it, happened long after; but he takes occasion
to speak of it here on account of the grandeur of the Assyrian
kingdom, which was wonderfully extended by Ninus son of Belus, and
founder of the great city Nineveh, which was named after him, Nineveh,
from Ninus. But Assur, father of the Assyrian, was not one of the
sons of Ham, Noah's son, but is found among the sons of Shem, his
eldest son. Whence it appears that among Shem's offspring there arose
men who afterwards took possession of that giant's kingdom, and
advancing from it, founded other cities, the first of which was called
Nineveh, from Ninus. From him Scripture returns to Ham's other son,
Mizraim; and his sons are enumerated, not as seven individuals, but as
seven nations. And from the sixth, as if from the sixth son, the race
called the Philistines are said to have sprung; so that there are in
all eight. Then it returns again to Canaan, in whose person Ham was
cursed; and his eleven sons are named. Then the territories they
occupied, and some of the cities, are named. And thus, if we count
sons and grandsons, there are thirty-one of Ham's descendants
registered.
It remains to mention the sons of Shem, Noah's eldest son; for to him
this genealogical narrative gradually ascends from the youngest. But
in the commencement of the record of Shem's sons there is an obscurity
which calls for explanation, since it is closely connected with the
object of our investigation. For we read, "Unto Shem also, the father
of all the children of Heber, the brother of Japheth the elder, were
children born." [872]This is the order of the words: And to Shem
was born Heber, even to himself, that is, to Shem himself was born
Heber, and Shem is the father of all his children. We are intended to
understand that Shem is the patriarch of all his posterity who were to
be mentioned, whether sons, grandsons, great-grandsons, or descendants
at any remove. For Shem did not beget Heber, who was indeed in the
fifth generation from him. For Shem begat, among other sons,
Arphaxad; Arphaxad begat Cainan, Cainan begat Salah, Salah begat
Heber. And it was with good reason that he was named first among
Shem's offspring, taking precedence even of his sons, though only a
grandchild of the fifth generation; for from him, as tradition says,
the Hebrews derived their name, though the other etymology which
derives the name from Abraham (as if Abrahews) may possibly be
correct. But there can be little doubt that the former is the right
etymology, and that they were called after Heber, Heberews, and then,
dropping a letter, Hebrews; and so was their language called Hebrew,
which was spoken by none but the people of Israel among whom was the
city of God, mysteriously prefigured in all the people, and truly
present in the saints. Six of Shem's sons then are first named, then
four grandsons born to one of these sons; then it mentions another son
of Shem, who begat a grandson; and his son, again, or Shem's
great-grandson, was Heber. And Heber begat two sons, and called the
one Peleg, which means "dividing;" and Scripture subjoins the reason
of this name, saying, "for in his days was the earth divided." What
this means will afterwards appear. Heber's other son begat twelve
sons; consequently all Shem's descendants are twenty-seven. The total
number of the progeny of the three sons of Noah is seventy-three,
fifteen by Japheth, thirty-one by Ham, twenty-seven by Shem. Then
Scripture adds, "These are the sons of Shem, after their families,
after their tongues, in their lands, after their nations." And so of
the whole number "These are the families of the sons of Noah after
their generations, in their nations; and by these were the isles of
the nations dispersed through the earth after the flood." From which
we gather that the seventy-three (or rather, as I shall presently
show, seventy-two) were not individuals, but nations. For in a former
passage, when the sons of Japheth were enumerated, it is said in
conclusion, "By these were the isles of the nations divided in their
lands, every one after his language, in their tribes, and in their
nations."
But nations are expressly mentioned among the sons of Ham, as I showed
above. "Mizraim begat those who are called Ludim;" and so also of the
other seven nations. And after enumerating all of them, it concludes,
"These are the sons of Ham, in their families, according to their
languages, in their territories, and in their nations." The reason,
then, why the children of several of them are not mentioned, is that
they belonged by birth to other nations, and did not themselves become
nations. Why else is it, that though eight sons are reckoned to
Japheth, the sons of only two of these are mentioned; and though four
are reckoned to Ham, only three are spoken of as having sons; and
though six are reckoned to Shem, the descendants of only two of these
are traced? Did the rest remain childless? We cannot suppose so; but
they did not produce nations so great as to warrant their being
mentioned, but were absorbed in the nations to which they belonged by
birth.
Footnotes
[871] Augustin here follows the Greek version, which introduces the
name Elisa among the sons of Japheth, though not found in the Hebrew.
It is not found in the Complutensian Greek translation, nor in the
Mss. used by Jerome.
[872] Gen. x. 21.
Chapter 4.--Of the Diversity of Languages, and of the Founding of
Babylon.
But though these nations are said to have been dispersed according to
their languages, yet the narrator recurs to that time when all had but
one language, and explains how it came to pass that a diversity of
languages was introduced. "The whole earth," he says, "was of one
lip, and all had one speech. And it came to pass, as they journeyed
from the east, that they found a plain in the land of Shinar, and
dwelt there. And they said one to another, Come, and let us make
bricks, and burn them thoroughly. And they had bricks for stone, and
slime for mortar. And they said, Come, and let us build for ourselves
a city, and a tower whose top shall reach the sky; and let us make us
a name, before we be scattered abroad on the face of all the earth.
And the Lord came down to see the city and the tower, which the
children of men builded. And the Lord God said, Behold, the people is
one, and they have all one language; and this they begin to do: and
now nothing will be restrained from them, which they have imagined to
do. Come, and let us go down, and confound there their language, that
they may not understand one another's speech. And God scattered them
thence on the face of all the earth: and they left off to build the
city and the tower. Therefore the name of it is called Confusion;
because the Lord did there confound the language of all the earth:
and the Lord God scattered them thence on the face of all the earth."
[873]This city, which was called Confusion, is the same as Babylon,
whose wonderful construction Gentile history also notices. For
Babylon means Confusion. Whence we conclude that the giant Nimrod was
its founder, as had been hinted a little before, where Scripture, in
speaking of him, says that the beginning of his kingdom was Babylon,
that is, Babylon had a supremacy over the other cities as the
metropolis and royal residence; although it did not rise to the grand
dimensions designed by its proud and impious founder. The plan was to
make it so high that it should reach the sky, whether this was meant
of one tower which they intended to build higher than the others, or
of all the towers, which might be signified by the singular number, as
we speak of "the soldier," meaning the army, and of the frog or the
locust, when we refer to the whole multitude of frogs and locusts in
the plagues with which Moses smote the Egyptians. [874] But what did
these vain and presumptuous men intend? How did they expect to raise
this lofty mass against God, when they had built it above all the
mountains and the clouds of the earth's atmosphere? What injury could
any spiritual or material elevation do to God? The safe and true way
to heaven is made by humility, which lifts up the heart to the Lord,
not against Him; as this giant is said to have been a "hunter against
the Lord." This has been misunderstood by some through the ambiguity
of the Greek word, and they have translated it, not "against the
Lord," but "before the Lord;" for enantion means both "before" and
"against." In the Psalm this word is rendered, "Let us weep before
the Lord our Maker." [875]The same word occurs in the book of Job,
where it is written, "Thou hast broken into fury against the Lord."
[876]And so this giant is to be recognized as a "hunter against the
Lord." And what is meant by the term "hunter" but deceiver,
oppressor, and destroyer of the animals of the earth? He and his
people therefore, erected this tower against the Lord, and so gave
expression to their impious pride; and justly was their wicked
intention punished by God, even though it was unsuccessful. But what
was the nature of the punishment? As the tongue is the instrument of
domination, in it pride was punished; so that man, who would not
understand God when He issued His commands, should be misunderstood
when he himself gave orders. Thus was that conspiracy disbanded, for
each man retired from those he could not understand, and associated
with those whose speech was intelligible; and the nations were divided
according to their languages, and scattered over the earth as seemed
good to God, who accomplished this in ways hidden from and
incomprehensible to us.
Footnotes
[873] Gen. xi. 1-9.
[874] Ex. x.
[875] Ps. xcv. 6.
[876] Job xv. 13.
Chapter 5.--Of God's Coming Down to Confound the Languages of the
Builders of the City.
We read, "The Lord came down to see the city and the tower which the
sons of men built:" it was not the sons of God, but that society
which lived in a merely human way, and which we call the earthly
city. God, who is always wholly everywhere, does not move locally;
but He is said to descend when He does anything in the earth out of
the usual course, which, as it were, makes His presence felt. And in
the same way, He does not by "seeing" learn some new thing, for He
cannot ever be ignorant of anything; but He is said to see and
recognize, in time, that which He causes others to see and recognize.
And therefore that city was not previously being seen as God made it
be seen when He showed how offensive it was to Him. We might, indeed,
interpret God's descending to the city of the descent of His angels in
whom He dwells; so that the following words, "And the Lord God said,
Behold, they are all one race and of one language," and also what
follows, "Come, and let us go down and confound their speech," are a
recapitulation, explaining how the previously intimated "descent of
the Lord" was accomplished. For if He had already gone down, why does
He say, "Come, and let us go down and confound?"--words which seem to
be addressed to the angels, and to intimate that He who was in the
angels descended in their descent. And the words most appropriately
are, not, "Go ye down and confound," but, "Let us confound their
speech;" showing that He so works by His servants, that they are
themselves also fellow-laborers with God, as the apostle says, "For we
are fellow-laborers with God." [877]
Footnotes
[877] 1 Cor. iii. 9.
Chapter 6.--What We are to Understand by God's Speaking to the Angels.
We might have supposed that the words uttered at the creation of man,
"Let us," and not Let me, "make man," were addressed to the angels,
had He not added "in our image;" but as we cannot believe that man was
made in the image of angels, or that the image of God is the same as
that of angels, it is proper to refer this expression to the plurality
of the Trinity. And yet this Trinity, being one God, even after
saying "Let us make," goes on to say, "And God made man in His image,"
[878] and not "Gods made," or "in their image." And were there any
difficulty in applying to the angels the words, "Come, and let us go
down and confound their speech," we might refer the plural to the
Trinity, as if the Father were addressing the Son and the Holy Spirit;
but it rather belongs to the angels to approach God by holy movements,
that is, by pious thoughts, and thereby to avail themselves of the
unchangeable truth which rules in the court of heaven as their eternal
law. For they are not themselves the truth; but partaking in the
creative truth, they are moved towards it as the fountain of life,
that what they have not in themselves they may obtain in it. And this
movement of theirs is steady, for they never go back from what they
have reached. And to these angels God does not speak, as we speak to
one another, or to God, or to angels, or as the angels speak to us, or
as God speaks to us through them: He speaks to them in an ineffable
manner of His own, and that which He says is conveyed to us in a
manner suited to our capacity. For the speaking of God antecedent and
superior to all His works, is the immutable reason of His work: it
has no noisy and passing sound, but an energy eternally abiding and
producing results in time. Thus He speaks to the holy angels; but to
us, who are far off, He speaks otherwise. When, however, we hear with
the inner ear some part of the speech of God, we approximate to the
angels. But in this work I need not labor to give an account of the
ways in which God speaks. For either the unchangeable Truth speaks
directly to the mind of the rational creature in some indescribable
way, or speaks through the changeable creature, either presenting
spiritual images to our spirit, or bodily voices to our bodily sense.
The words, "Nothing will be restrained from them which they have
imagined to do," [879] are assuredly not meant as an affirmation, but
as an interrogation, such as is used by persons threatening, as e.g.,
when Dido exclaims,
"They will not take arms and pursue?" [880]
We are to understand the words as if it had been said, Shall nothing
be restrained from them which they have imagined to do? [881]From
these three men, therefore, the three sons of Noah we mean, 73, or
rather, as the catalogue will show, 72 nations and as many languages
were dispersed over the earth, and as they increased filled even the
islands. But the nations multiplied much more than the languages.
For even in Africa we know several barbarous nations which have but
one language; and who can doubt that, as the human race increased, men
contrived to pass to the islands in ships?
Footnotes
[878] Gen. i. 26.
[879] Gen. xi. 6.
[880] Virgil, Æn., iv. 592.
[881] Here Augustin remarks on the addition of the particle ne to the
word non, which he has made to bring out the sense.
Chapter 7.--Whether Even the Remotest Islands Received Their Fauna
from the Animals Which Were Preserved, Through the Deluge, in the Ark.
There is a question raised about all those kinds of beasts which are
not domesticated, nor are produced like frogs from the earth, but are
propagated by male and female parents, such as wolves and animals of
that kind; and it is asked how they could be found in the islands
after the deluge, in which all the animals not in the ark perished,
unless the breed was restored from those which were preserved in pairs
in the ark. It might, indeed, be said that they crossed to the
islands by swimming, but this could only be true of those very near
the mainland; whereas there are some so distant, that we fancy no
animal could swim to them. But if men caught them and took them
across with themselves, and thus propagated these breeds in their new
abodes, this would not imply an incredible fondness for the chase. At
the same time, it cannot be denied that by the intervention of angels
they might be transferred by God's order or permission. If, however,
they were produced out of the earth as at their first creation, when
God said, "Let the earth bring forth the living creature," [882] this
makes it more evident that all kinds of animals were preserved in the
ark, not so much for the sake of renewing the stock, as of prefiguring
the various nations which were to be saved in the church; this, I say,
is more evident, if the earth brought forth many animals in islands to
which they could not cross over.
Footnotes
[882] Gen. i. 24.
Chapter 8.--Whether Certain Monstrous Races of Men are Derived from
the Stock of Adam or Noah's Sons.
It is also asked whether we are to believe that certain monstrous
races of men, spoken of in secular history, [883] have sprung from
Noah's sons, or rather, I should say, from that one man from whom they
themselves were descended. For it is reported that some have one eye
in the middle of the forehead; some, feet turned backwards from the
heel; some, a double sex, the right breast like a man, the left like a
woman, and that they alternately beget and bring forth: others are
said to have no mouth, and to breathe only through the nostrils;
others are but a cubit high, and are therefore called by the Greeks
"Pigmies:" [884]they say that in some places the women conceive in
their fifth year, and do not live beyond their eighth. So, too, they
tell of a race who have two feet but only one leg, and are of
marvellous swiftness, though they do not bend the knee: they are
called Skiopodes, because in the hot weather they lie down on their
backs and shade themselves with their feet. Others are said to have
no head, and their eyes in their shoulders; and other human or
quasi-human races are depicted in mosaic in the harbor esplanade of
Carthage, on the faith of histories of rarities. What shall I say of
the Cynocephali, whose dog-like head and barking proclaim them beasts
rather than men? But we are not bound to believe all we hear of these
monstrosities. But whoever is anywhere born a man, that is, a
rational, mortal animal, no matter what unusual appearance he presents
in color, movement, sound, nor how peculiar he is in some power, part,
or quality of his nature, no Christian can doubt that he springs from
that one protoplast. We can distinguish the common human nature from
that which is peculiar, and therefore wonderful.
The same account which is given of monstrous births in individual
cases can be given of monstrous races. For God, the Creator of all,
knows where and when each thing ought to be, or to have been created,
because He sees the similarities and diversities which can contribute
to the beauty of the whole. But He who cannot see the whole is
offended by the deformity of the part, because he is blind to that
which balances it, and to which it belongs. We know that men are born
with more than four fingers on their hands or toes on their feet:
this is a smaller matter; but far from us be the folly of supposing
that the Creator mistook the number of a man's fingers, though we
cannot account for the difference. And so in cases where the
divergence from the rule is greater. He whose works no man justly
finds fault with, knows what He has done. At Hippo-Diarrhytus there
is a man whose hands are crescent-shaped, and have only two fingers
each, and his feet similarly formed. If there were a race like him,
it would be added to the history of the curious and wonderful. Shall
we therefore deny that this man is descended from that one man who was
first created? As for the Androgyni, or Hermaphrodites, as they are
called, though they are rare, yet from time to time there appears
persons of sex so doubtful, that it remains uncertain from which sex
they take their name; though it is customary to give them a masculine
name, as the more worthy. For no one ever called them
Hermaphroditesses. Some years ago, quite within my own memory, a man
was born in the East, double in his upper, but single in his lower
half--having two heads, two chests, four hands, but one body and two
feet like an ordinary man; and he lived so long that many had an
opportunity of seeing him. But who could enumerate all the human
births that have differed widely from their ascertained parents? As,
therefore, no one will deny that these are all descended from that one
man, so all the races which are reported to have diverged in bodily
appearance from the usual course which nature generally or almost
universally preserves, if they are embraced in that definition of man
as rational and mortal animals, unquestionably trace their pedigree to
that one first father of all. We are supposing these stories about
various races who differ from one another and from us to be true; but
possibly they are not: for if we were not aware that apes, and
monkeys, and sphinxes are not men, but beasts, those historians would
possibly describe them as races of men, and flaunt with impunity their
false and vainglorious discoveries. But supposing they are men of
whom these marvels are recorded, what if God has seen fit to create
some races in this way, that we might not suppose that the monstrous
births which appear among ourselves are the failures of that wisdom
whereby He fashions the human nature, as we speak of the failure of a
less perfect workman? Accordingly, it ought not to seem absurd to us,
that as in individual races there are monstrous births, so in the
whole race there are monstrous races. Wherefore, to conclude this
question cautiously and guardedly, either these things which have been
told of some races have no existence at all; or if they do exist, they
are not human races; or if they are human, they are descended from
Adam.
Footnotes
[883] Pliny, Hist. Nat. vii. 2; Aulus Gellius, Noct. Att. ix. 4.
[884] From pugme, a cubit.
Chapter 9.--Whether We are to Believe in the Antipodes.
But as to the fable that there are Antipodes, that is to say, men on
the opposite side of the earth, where the sun rises when it sets to
us, men who walk with their feet opposite ours, that is on no ground
credible. And, indeed, it is not affirmed that this has been learned
by historical knowledge, but by scientific conjecture, on the ground
that the earth is suspended within the concavity of the sky, and that
it has as much room on the one side of it as on the other: hence they
say that the part which is beneath must also be inhabited. But they
do not remark that, although it be supposed or scientifically
demonstrated that the world is of a round and spherical form, yet it
does not follow that the other side of the earth is bare of water; nor
even, though it be bare, does it immediately follow that it is
peopled. For Scripture, which proves the truth of its historical
statements by the accomplishment of its prophecies, gives no false
information; and it is too absurd to say, that some men might have
taken ship and traversed the whole wide ocean, and crossed from this
side of the world to the other, and that thus even the inhabitants of
that distant region are descended from that one first man. Wherefore
let us seek if we can find the city of God that sojourns on earth
among those human races who are catalogued as having been divided into
seventy-two nations and as many languages. For it continued down to
the deluge and the ark, and is proved to have existed still among the
sons of Noah by their blessings, and chiefly in the eldest son Shem;
for Japheth received this blessing, that he should dwell in the tents
of Shem.
Chapter 10.--Of the Genealogy of Shem, in Whose Line the City of God
is Preserved Till the Time of Abraham.
It is necessary, therefore, to preserve the series of generations
descending from Shem, for the sake of exhibiting the city of God after
the flood; as before the flood it was exhibited in the series of
generations descending from Seth. And therefore does divine
Scripture, after exhibiting the earthly city as Babylon or
"Confusion," revert to the patriarch Shem, and recapitulate the
generations from him to Abraham, specifying besides, the year in which
each father begat the son that belonged to this line, and how long he
lived. And unquestionably it is this which fulfills the promise I
made, that it should appear why it is said of the sons of Heber, "The
name of the one was Peleg, for in his days the earth was divided."
[885]For what can we understand by the division of the earth, if
not the diversity of languages? And, therefore, omitting the other
sons of Shem, who are not concerned in this matter, Scripture gives
the genealogy of those by whom the line runs on to Abraham, as before
the flood those are given who carried on the line to Noah from Seth.
Accordingly this series of generations begins thus: "These are the
generations of Shem: Shem was an hundred years old, and begat
Arphaxad two years after the flood. And Shem lived after he begat
Arphaxad five hundred years, and begat sons and daughters." In like
manner it registers the rest, naming the year of his life in which
each begat the son who belonged to that line which extends to
Abraham. It specifies, too, how many years he lived thereafter,
begetting sons and daughters, that we may not childishly suppose that
the men named were the only men, but may understand how the population
increased, and how regions and kingdoms so vast could be populated by
the descendants of Shem; especially the kingdom of Assyria, from which
Ninus subdued the surrounding nations, reigning with brilliant
prosperity, and bequeathing to his descendants a vast but thoroughly
consolidated empire, which held together for many centuries.
But to avoid needless prolixity, we shall mention not the number of
years each member of this series lived, but only the year of his life
in which he begat his heir, that we may thus reckon the number of
years from the flood to Abraham, and may at the same time leave room
to touch briefly and cursorily upon some other matters necessary to
our argument. In the second year, then, after the flood, Shem when he
was a hundred years old begat Arphaxad; Arphaxad when he was 135 years
old begat Cainan; Cainan when he was 130 years begat Salah. Salah
himself, too, was the same age when he begat Eber. Eber lived 134
years, and begat Peleg, in whose days the earth was divided. Peleg
himself lived 130 years, and begat Reu; and Reu lived 132 years, and
begat Serug; Serug 130, and begat Nahor; and Nahor 79, and begat
Terah; and Terah 70, and begat Abram, whose name God afterwards
changed into Abraham. There are thus from the flood to Abraham 1072
years, according to the Vulgate or Septuagint versions. In the Hebrew
copies far fewer years are given; and for this either no reason or a
not very credible one is given.
When, therefore, we look for the city of God in these seventy-two
nations, we cannot affirm that while they had but one lip, that is,
one language, the human race had departed from the worship of the true
God, and that genuine godliness had survived only in those generations
which descend from Shem through Arphaxad and reach to Abraham; but
from the time when they proudly built a tower to heaven, a symbol of
godless exaltation, the city or society of the wicked becomes
apparent. Whether it was only disguised before, or non-existent;
whether both cities remained after the flood,--the godly in the two
sons of Noah who were blessed, and in their posterity, and the ungodly
in the cursed son and his descendants, from whom sprang that mighty
hunter against the Lord,--is not easily determined. For possibly--and
certainly this is more credible--there were despisers of God among the
descendants of the two sons, even before Babylon was founded, and
worshippers of God among the descendants of Ham. Certainly neither
race was ever obliterated from earth. For in both the Psalms in which
it is said, "They are all gone aside, they are altogether become
filthy; there is none that doeth good, no, not one," we read further,
"Have all the workers of iniquity no knowledge? who eat up my people
as they eat bread, and call not upon the Lord." [886]There was then
a people of God even at that time. And therefore the words, "There is
none that doeth good, no, not one," were said of the sons of men, not
of the sons of God. For it had been previously said, "God looked down
from heaven upon the sons of men, to see if any understood and sought
after God;" and then follow the words which demonstrate that all the
sons of men, that is, all who belong to the city which lives according
to man, not according to God, are reprobate.
Footnotes
[885] Gen. x. 25.
[886] Ps. xiv. 3, 4; liii. 3, 4.
Chapter 11.--That the Original Language in Use Among Men Was that
Which Was Afterwards Called Hebrew, from Heber, in Whose Family It Was
Preserved When the Confusion of Tongues Occurred.
Wherefore, as the fact of all using one language did not secure the
absence of sin-infected men from the race,--for even before the deluge
there was one language, and yet all but the single family of just Noah
were found worthy of destruction by the flood,--so when the nations,
by a prouder godlessness, earned the punishment of the dispersion and
the confusion of tongues, and the city of the godless was called
Confusion or Babylon, there was still the house of Heber in which the
primitive language of the race survived. And therefore, as I have
already mentioned, when an enumeration is made of the sons of Shem,
who each founded a nation, Heber is first mentioned, although he was
of the fifth generation from Shem. And because, when the other races
were divided by their own peculiar languages, his family preserved
that language which is not unreasonably believed to have been the
common language of the race, it was on this account thenceforth named
Hebrew. For it then became necessary to distinguish this language
from the rest by a proper name; though, while there was only one, it
had no other name than the language of man, or human speech, it alone
being spoken by the whole human race. Some one will say: If the
earth was divided by languages in the days of Peleg, Heber's son, that
language, which was formerly common to all, should rather have been
called after Peleg. But we are to understand that Heber himself gave
to his son this name Peleg, which means Division; because he was born
when the earth was divided, that is, at the very time of the division,
and that this is the meaning of the words, "In his days the earth was
divided." [887]For unless Heber had been still alive when the
languages were multiplied, the language which was preserved in his
house would not have been called after him. We are induced to believe
that this was the primitive and common language, because the
multiplication and change of languages was introduced as a punishment,
and it is fit to ascribe to the people of God an immunity from this
punishment. Nor is it without significance that this is the language
which Abraham retained, and that he could not transmit it to all his
descendants, but only to those of Jacob's line, who distinctively and
eminently constituted God's people, and received His covenants, and
were Christ's progenitors according to the flesh. In the same way,
Heber himself did not transmit that language to all his posterity, but
only to the line from which Abraham sprang. And thus, although it is
not expressly stated, that when the wicked were building Babylon there
was a godly seed remaining, this indistinctness is intended to
stimulate research rather than to elude it. For when we see that
originally there was one common language, and that Heber is mentioned
before all Shem's sons, though he belonged to the fifth generation
from him, and that the language which the patriarchs and prophets
used, not only in their conversation, but in the authoritative
language of Scripture, is called Hebrew, when we are asked where that
primitive and common language was preserved after the confusion of
tongues, certainly, as there can be no doubt that those among whom it
was preserved were exempt from the punishment it embodied, what other
suggestion can we make, than that it survived in the family of him
whose name it took, and that this is no small proof of the
righteousness of this family, that the punishment with which the other
families were visited did not fall upon it?
But yet another question is mooted: How did Heber and his son Peleg
each found a nation, if they had but one language? For no doubt the
Hebrew nation propagated from Heber through Abraham, and becoming
through him a great people, is one nation. How, then, are all the
sons of the three branches of Noah's family enumerated as founding a
nation each, if Heber and Peleg did not so? It is very probable that
the giant Nimrod founded also his nation, and that Scripture has named
him separately on account of the extraordinary dimensions of his
empire and of his body, so that the number of seventy-two nations
remains. But Peleg was mentioned, not because he founded a nation
(for his race and language are Hebrew), but on account of the critical
time at which he was born, all the earth being then divided. Nor
ought we to be surprised that the giant Nimrod lived to the time in
which Babylon was founded and the confusion of tongues occurred, and
the consequent division of the earth. For though Heber was in the
sixth generation from Noah, and Nimrod in the fourth, it does not
follow that they could not be alive at the same time. For when the
generations are few, they live longer and are born later; but when
they are many, they live a shorter time, and come into the world
earlier. We are to understand that, when the earth was divided, the
descendants of Noah who are registered as founders of nations were not
only already born, but were of an age to have immense families, worthy
to be called tribes or nations. And therefore we must by no means
suppose that they were born in the order in which they were set down;
otherwise, how could the twelve sons of Joktan, another son of
Heber's, and brother of Peleg, have already founded nations, if Joktan
was born, as he is registered, after his brother Peleg, since the
earth was divided at Peleg's birth? We are therefore to understand
that, though Peleg is named first, he was born long after Joktan,
whose twelve sons had already families so large as to admit of their
being divided by different languages. There is nothing extraordinary
in the last born being first named: of the sons of Noah, the
descendants of Japheth are first named; then the sons of Ham, who was
the second son; and last the sons of Shem, who was the first and
oldest. Of these nations the names have partly survived, so that at
this day we can see from whom they have sprung, as the Assyrians from
Assur, the Hebrews from Heber, but partly have been altered in the
lapse of time, so that the most learned men, by profound research in
ancient records, have scarcely been able to discover the origin, I do
not say of all, but of some of these nations. There is, for example,
nothing in the name Egyptians to show that they are descended from
Misraim, Ham's son, nor in the name Ethiopians to show a connection
with Cush, though such is said to be the origin of these nations. And
if we take a general survey of the names, we shall find that more have
been changed than have remained the same.
Footnotes
[887] Gen. x. 25.
Chapter 12.--Of the Era in Abraham's Life from Which a New Period in
the Holy Succession Begins.
Let us now survey the progress of the city of God from the era of the
patriarch Abraham, from whose time it begins to be more conspicuous,
and the divine promises which are now fulfilled in Christ are more
fully revealed. We learn, then, from the intimations of holy
Scripture, that Abraham was born in the country of the Chaldeans, a
land belonging to the Assyrian empire. Now, even at that time impious
superstitions were rife with the Chaldeans, as with other nations.
The family of Terah, to which Abraham belonged, was the only one in
which the worship of the true God survived, and the only one, we may
suppose, in which the Hebrew language was preserved; although Joshua
the son of Nun tells us that even this family served other gods in
Mesopotamia. [888]The other descendants of Heber gradually became
absorbed in other races and other languages. And thus, as the single
family of Noah was preserved through the deluge of water to renew the
human race, so, in the deluge of superstition that flooded the whole
world, there remained but the one family of Terah in which the seed of
God's city was preserved. And as, when Scripture has enumerated the
generations prior to Noah, with their ages, and explained the cause of
the flood before God began to speak to Noah about the building of the
ark, it is said, "These are the generations of Noah;" so also now,
after enumerating the generations from Shem, Noah's son, down to
Abraham, it then signalizes an era by saying, "These are the
generations of Terah: Terah begat Abram, Nahor, and Haran; and Haran
begat Lot. And Haran died before his father Terah in the land of his
nativity, in Ur of the Chaldees. And Abram and Nahor took them
wives: the name of Abram's wife was Sarai; and the name of Nahor's
wife Milcah, the daughter of Haran, the father of Milcah, and the
father of Iscah." [889]This Iscah is supposed to be the same as
Sarah, Abraham's wife.
Footnotes
[888] Josh. xxiv. 2.
[889] Gen. xi. 27-29.
Chapter 13.--Why, in the Account of Terah's Emigration, on His
Forsaking the Chaldeans and Passing Over into Mesopotamia, No Mention
is Made of His Son Nahor.
Next it is related how Terah with his family left the region of the
Chaldeans and came into Mesopotamia, and dwelt in Haran. But nothing
is said about one of his sons called Nahor, as if he had not taken him
along with him. For the narrative runs thus: "And Terah took Abram
his son, and Lot the son of Haran, his son's son, and Sarah his
daughter-in-law, his son Abram's wife, and led them forth out of the
region of the Chaldeans to go into the land of Canaan; and he came
into Haran, and dwelt there." [890]Nahor and Milcah his wife are
nowhere named here. But afterwards, when Abraham sent his servant to
take a wife for his son Isaac, we find it thus written: "And the
servant took ten camels of the camels of his lord, and of all the
goods of his lord, with him; and arose, and went into Mesopotamia,
into the city of Nahor." [891]This and other testimonies of this
sacred history show that Nahor, Abraham's brother, had also left the
region of the Chaldeans, and fixed his abode in Mesopotamia, where
Abraham dwelt with his father. Why, then, did the Scripture not
mention him, when Terah with his family went forth out of the Chaldean
nation and dwelt in Haran, since it mentions that he took with him not
only Abraham his son, but also Sarah his daughter-in-law, and Lot his
grandson? The only reason we can think of is, that perhaps he had
lapsed from the piety of his father and brother, and adhered to the
superstition of the Chaldeans, and had afterwards emigrated thence,
either through penitence, or because he was persecuted as a suspected
person. For in the book called Judith, when Holofernes, the enemy of
the Israelites, inquired what kind of nation that might be, and
whether war should be made against them, Achior, the leader of the
Ammonites, answered him thus: "Let our lord now hear a word from the
mouth of thy servant, and I will declare unto thee the truth
concerning the people which dwelleth near thee in this hill country,
and there shall no lie come out of the mouth of thy servant. For this
people is descended from the Chaldeans, and they dwelt heretofore in
Mesopotamia, because they would not follow the gods of their fathers,
which were glorious in the land of the Chaldeans, but went out of the
way of their ancestors, and adored the God of heaven, whom they knew;
and they cast them out from the face of their gods, and they fled into
Mesopotamia, and dwelt there many days. And their God said to them,
that they should depart from their habitation, and go into the land of
Canaan; and they dwelt," [892] etc., as Achior the Ammonite narrates.
Whence it is manifest that the house of Terah had suffered persecution
from the Chaldeans for the true piety with which they worshipped the
one and true God.
Footnotes
[890] Gen. xi. 31.
[891] Gen. xxiv. 10.
[892] Judith v. 5-9.
Chapter 14.--Of the Years of Terah, Who Completed His Lifetime in
Haran.
On Terah's death in Mesopotamia, where he is said to have lived 205
years, the promises of God made to Abraham now begin to be pointed
out; for thus it is written: "And the days of Terah in Haran were two
hundred and five years, and he died in Haran." [893]This is not to
be taken as if he had spent all his days there, but that he there
completed the days of his life, which were two hundred and five
years: otherwise it would not be known how many years Terah lived,
since it is not said in what year of his life he came into Haran; and
it is absurd to suppose that, in this series of generations, where it
is carefully recorded how many years each one lived, his age was the
only one not put on record. For although some whom the same Scripture
mentions have not their age recorded, they are not in this series, in
which the reckoning of time is continuously indicated by the death of
the parents and the succession of the children. For this series,
which is given in order from Adam to Noah, and from him down to
Abraham, contains no one without the number of the years of his life.
Footnotes
[893] Gen. xi. 32.
Chapter 15.--Of the Time of the Migration of Abraham, When, According
to the Commandment of God, He Went Out from Haran.
When, after the record of the death of Terah, the father of Abraham,
we next read, "And the Lord said to Abram, Get thee out of thy
country, and from thy kindred, and from thy father's house," [894]
etc., it is not to be supposed, because this follows in the order of
the narrative, that it also followed in the chronological order of
events. For if it were so, there would be an insoluble difficulty.
For after these words of God which were spoken to Abraham, the
Scripture says: "And Abram departed, as the Lord had spoken unto him;
and Lot went with him. Now Abraham was seventy-five years old when he
departed out of Haran." [895]How can this be true if he departed
from Haran after his father's death? For when Terah was seventy years
old, as is intimated above, he begat Abraham; and if to this number we
add the seventy-five years which Abraham reckoned when he went out of
Haran, we get 145 years. Therefore that was the number of the years
of Terah, when Abraham departed out of that city of Mesopotamia; for
he had reached the seventy-fifth year of his life, and thus his
father, who begat him in the seventieth year of his life, had reached,
as was said, his 145th. Therefore he did not depart thence after his
father's death, that is, after the 205 years his father lived; but the
year of his departure from that place, seeing it was his
seventy-fifth, is inferred beyond a doubt to have been the 145th of
his father, who begat him in his seventieth year. And thus it is to
be understood that the Scripture, according to its custom, has gone
back to the time which had already been passed by the narrative; just
as above, when it had mentioned the grandsons of Noah, it said that
they were in their nations and tongues; and yet afterwards, as if this
also had followed in order of time, it says, "And the whole earth was
of one lip, and one speech for all." [896]How, then, could they be
said to be in their own nations and according to their own tongues, if
there was one for all; except because the narrative goes back to
gather up what it had passed over? Here, too, in the same way, after
saying, "And the days of Terah in Haran were 205 years, and Terah died
in Haran," the Scripture, going back to what had been passed over in
order to complete what had been begun about Terah, says, "And the Lord
said to Abram, Get thee out of thy country," [897] etc. After which
words of God it is added, "And Abram departed, as the Lord spake unto
him; and Lot went with him. But Abram was seventy-five years old when
he departed out of Haran." Therefore it was done when his father was
in the 145th year of his age; for it was then the seventy-fifth of his
own. But this question is also solved in another way, that the
seventy-five years of Abraham when he departed out of Haran are
reckoned from the year in which he was delivered from the fire of the
Chaldeans, not from that of his birth, as if he was rather to be held
as having been born then.
Now the blessed Stephen, in narrating these things in the Acts of the
Apostles, says: "The God of glory appeared unto our father Abraham,
when he was in Mesopotamia, before he dwelt in Charran, and said unto
him, Get thee out of thy country, and from thy kindred, and from thy
father's house, and come into the land which I will show thee." [898]
According to these words of Stephen, God spoke to Abraham, not after
the death of his father, who certainly died in Haran, where his son
also dwelt with him, but before he dwelt in that city, although he was
already in Mesopotamia. Therefore he had already departed from the
Chaldeans. So that when Stephen adds, "Then Abraham went out of the
land of the Chaldeans, and dwelt in Charran," [899] this does not
point out what took place after God spoke to him (for it was not after
these words of God that he went out of the land of the Chaldeans,
since he says that God spoke to him in Mesopotamia), but the word
"then" which he uses refers to that whole period from his going out of
the land of the Chaldeans and dwelling in Haran. Likewise in what
follows, "And thenceforth, when his father was dead, he settled him in
this land, wherein ye now dwell, and your fathers," he does not say,
after his father was dead he went out from Haran; but thenceforth he
settled him here, after his father was dead. It is to be understood,
therefore, that God had spoken to Abraham when he was in Mesopotamia,
before he dwelt in Haran; but that he came to Haran with his father,
keeping in mind the precept of God, and that he went out thence in his
own seventy-fifth year, which was his father's 145th. But he says
that his settlement in the land of Canaan, not his going forth from
Haran, took place after his father's death; because his father was
already dead when he purchased the land, and personally entered on
possession of it. But when, on his having already settled in
Mesopotamia, that is, already gone out of the land of the Chaldeans,
God says, "Get thee out of thy country, and from thy kindred, and from
thy father's house," [900] this means, not that he should cast out his
body from thence, for he had already done that, but that he should
tear away his soul. For he had not gone out from thence in mind, if
he was held by the hope and desire of returning,--a hope and desire
which was to be cut off by God's command and help, and by his own
obedience. It would indeed be no incredible supposition that
afterwards, when Nahor followed his father, Abraham then fulfilled the
precept of the Lord, that he should depart out of Haran with Sarah his
wife and Lot his brother's son.
Footnotes
[894] Gen. xii. 1.
[895] Gen. xii. 4.
[896] Gen. xi. 1.
[897] Gen. xii. 1.
[898] Acts vii. 2, 3.
[899] Acts vii. 4.
[900] Gen. xii. 1.
Chapter 16.--Of the Order and Nature of the Promises of God Which Were
Made to Abraham.
God's promises made to Abraham are now to be considered; for in these
the oracles of our God, [901] that is, of the true God, began to
appear more openly concerning the godly people, whom prophetic
authority foretold. The first of these reads thus: "And the Lord
said unto Abram, Get thee out of thy country, and from thy kindred,
and from thy father's house, and go into a land that I will show
thee: and I will make of thee a great nation, and I will bless thee
and magnify thy name; and thou shall be blessed: and I will bless
them that bless thee, and curse them that curse thee: and in thee
shall all tribes of the earth be blessed." [902]Now it is to be
observed that two things are promised to Abraham, the one, that his
seed should possess the land of Canaan, which is intimated when it is
said, "Go into a land that I will show thee, and I will make of thee a
great nation;" but the other far more excellent, not about the carnal
but the spiritual seed, through which he is the father, not of the one
Israelite nation, but of all nations who follow the footprints of his
faith, which was first promised in these words, "And in thee shall all
tribes of the earth be blessed." Eusebius thought this promise was
made in Abraham's seventy-fifth year, as if soon after it was made
Abraham had departed out of Haran because the Scripture cannot be
contradicted in which we read, "Abram was seventy and five years old
when he departed out of Haran." But if this promise was made in that
year, then of course Abraham was staying in Haran with his father; for
he could not depart thence unless he had first dwelt there. Does
this, then, contradict what Stephen says, "The God of glory appeared
to our father Abraham, when he was in Mesopotamia, before he dwelt in
Charran?" [903]But it is to be understood that the whole took place
in the same year,--both the promise of God before Abraham dwelt in
Haran, and his dwelling in Haran, and his departure thence,--not only
because Eusebius in the Chronicles reckons from the year of this
promise, and shows that after 430 years the exodus from Egypt took
place, when the law was given, but because the Apostle Paul also
mentions it.
Footnotes
[901] Various reading, "of our Lord Jesus Christ."
[902] Gen. xii. 1-3.
[903] Acts vii. 2.
Chapter 17.--Of the Three Most Famous Kingdoms of the Nations, of
Which One, that is the Assyrian, Was Already Very Eminent When Abraham
Was Born.
During the same period there were three famous kingdoms of the
nations, in which the city of the earth-born, that is, the society of
men living according to man under the domination of the fallen angels,
chiefly flourished, namely, the three kingdoms of Sicyon, Egypt, and
Assyria. Of these, Assyria was much the most powerful and sublime;
for that king Ninus, son of Belus, had subdued the people of all Asia
except India. By Asia I now mean not that part which is one province
of this greater Asia, but what is called Universal Asia, which some
set down as the half, but most as the third part of the whole
world,--the three being Asia, Europe, and Africa, thereby making an
unequal division. For the part called Asia stretches from the south
through the east even to the north; Europe from the north even to the
west; and Africa from the west even to the south. Thus we see that
two, Europe and Africa, contain one half of the world, and Asia alone
the other half. And these two parts are made by the circumstance,
that there enters between them from the ocean all the Mediterranean
water, which makes this great sea of ours. So that, if you divide the
world into two parts, the east and the west, Asia will be in the one,
and Europe and Africa in the other. So that of the three kingdoms
then famous, one, namely Sicyon, was not under the Assyrians, because
it was in Europe; but as for Egypt, how could it fail to be subject to
the empire which ruled all Asia with the single exception of India?
In Assyria, therefore, the dominion of the impious city had the
pre-eminence. Its head was Babylon,--an earth-born city, most fitly
named, for it means confusion. There Ninus reigned after the death of
his father Belus, who first had reigned there sixty-five years. His
son Ninus, who, on his father's death, succeeded to the kingdom,
reigned fifty-two years, and had been king forty-three years when
Abraham was born, which was about the 1200th year before Rome was
founded, as it were another Babylon in the west.
Chapter 18.--Of the Repeated Address of God to Abraham, in Which He
Promised the Land of Canaan to Him and to His Seed.
Abraham, then, having departed out of Haran in the seventy-fifth year
of his own age, and in the hundred and forty-fifth of his father's,
went with Lot, his brother's son, and Sarah his wife, into the land of
Canaan, and came even to Sichem, where again he received the divine
oracle, of which it is thus written: "And the Lord appeared unto
Abram, and said unto him, Unto thy seed will I give this land." [904]
Nothing is promised here about that seed in which he is made the
father of all nations, but only about that by which he is the father
of the one Israelite nation; for by this seed that land was possessed.
Footnotes
[904] Gen. xii. 7.
Chapter 19.--Of the Divine Preservation of Sarah's Chastity in Egypt,
When Abraham Had Called Her Not His Wife But His Sister.
Having built an altar there, and called upon God, Abraham proceeded
thence and dwelt in the desert, and was compelled by pressure of
famine to go on into Egypt. There he called his wife his sister, and
told no lie. For she was this also, because she was near of blood;
just as Lot, on account of the same nearness, being his brother's son,
is called his brother. Now he did not deny that she was his wife, but
held his peace about it, committing to God the defence of his wife's
chastity, and providing as a man against human wiles; because if he
had not provided against the danger as much as he could, he would have
been tempting God rather than trusting in Him. We have said enough
about this matter against the calumnies of Faustus the Manichæan. At
last what Abraham had expected the Lord to do took place. For
Pharaoh, king of Egypt, who had taken her to him as his wife, restored
her to her husband on being severely plagued. And far be it from us
to believe that she was defiled by lying with another; because it is
much more credible that, by these great afflictions, Pharaoh was not
permitted to do this.
Chapter 20.--Of the Parting of Lot and Abraham, Which They Agreed to
Without Breach of Charity.
On Abraham's return out of Egypt to the place he had left, Lot, his
brother's son, departed from him into the land of Sodom, without
breach of charity. For they had grown rich, and began to have many
herdmen of cattle, and when these strove together, they avoided in
this way the pugnacious discord of their families. Indeed, as human
affairs go, this cause might even have given rise to some strife
between themselves. Consequently these are the words of Abraham to
Lot, when taking precaution against this evil, "Let there be no strife
between me and thee, and between my herdmen and thy herdmen; for we be
brethren. Behold, is not the whole land before thee? Separate
thyself from me: if thou wilt go to the left hand, I will go to the
right; or if thou wilt go to the right hand, I will go to the left."
[905]From this, perhaps, has arisen a pacific custom among men,
that when there is any partition of earthly things, the greater should
make the division, the less the choice.
Footnotes
[905] Gen. xiii. 8, 9.
Chapter 21.--Of the Third Promise of God, by Which He Assured the Land
of Canaan to Abraham and His Seed in Perpetuity.
Now, when Abraham and Lot had separated, and dwelt apart, owing to the
necessity of supporting their families, and not to vile discord, and
Abraham was in the land of Canaan, but Lot in Sodom, the Lord said to
Abraham in a third oracle, "Lift up thine eyes, and look from the
place where thou now art, to the north, and to Africa, and to the
east, and to the sea; for all the land which thou seest, to thee will
I give it, and to thy seed for ever. And I will make thy seed as the
dust of the earth: if any one can number the dust of the earth, thy
seed shall also be numbered. Arise, and walk through the land, in the
length of it, and in the breadth of it; for unto thee will I give it."
[906]It does not clearly appear whether in this promise that also
is contained by which he is made the father of all nations. For the
clause, "And I will make thy seed as the dust of the earth," may seem
to refer to this, being spoken by that figure the Greeks call
hyperbole, which indeed is figurative, not literal. But no person of
understanding can doubt in what manner the Scripture uses this and
other figures. For that figure (that is, way of speaking) is used
when what is said is far larger than what is meant by it; for who does
not see how incomparably larger the number of the dust must be than
that of all men can be from Adam himself down to the end of the
world? How much greater, then, must it be than the seed of
Abraham,--not only that pertaining to the nation of Israel, but also
that which is and shall be according to the imitation of faith in all
nations of the whole wide world! For that seed is indeed very small
in comparison with the multitude of the wicked, although even those
few of themselves make an innumerable multitude, which by a hyperbole
is compared to the dust of the earth. Truly that multitude which was
promised to Abraham is not innumerable to God, although to man; but to
God not even the dust of the earth is so. Further, the promise here
made may be understood not only of the nation of Israel, but of the
whole seed of Abraham, which may be fitly compared to the dust for
multitude, because regarding it also there is the promise [907] of
many children, not according to the flesh, but according to the
spirit. But we have therefore said that this does not clearly appear,
because the multitude even of that one nation, which was born
according to the flesh of Abraham through his grandson Jacob, has
increased so much as to fill almost all parts of the world.
Consequently, even it might by hyperbole be compared to the dust for
multitude, because even it alone is innumerable by man. Certainly no
one questions that only that land is meant which is called Canaan.
But that saying, "To thee will I give it, and to thy seed for ever,"
may move some, if by "for ever" they understand "to eternity." But if
in this passage they take "for ever" thus, as we firmly hold it means
that the beginning of the world to come is to be ordered from the end
of the present, there is still no difficulty, because, although the
Israelites are expelled from Jerusalem, they still remain in other
cities in the land of Canaan, and shall remain even to the end; and
when that whole land is inhabited by Christians, they also are the
very seed of Abraham.
Footnotes
[906] Gen. xiii. 14-17.
[907] Various reading, "the express promise."
Chapter 22.--Of Abraham's Overcoming the Enemies of Sodom, When He
Delivered Lot from Captivity and Was Blessed by Melchizedek the
Priest.
Having received this oracle of promise, Abraham migrated, and remained
in another place of the same land, that is, beside the oak of Mamre,
which was Hebron. Then on the invasion of Sodom, when five kings
carried on war against four, and Lot was taken captive with the
conquered Sodomites, Abraham delivered him from the enemy, leading
with him to battle three hundred and eighteen of his home-born
servants, and won the victory for the kings of Sodom, but would take
nothing of the spoils when offered by the king for whom he had won
them. He was then openly blessed by Melchizedek, who was priest of
God Most High, about whom many and great things are written in the
epistle which is inscribed to the Hebrews, which most say is by the
Apostle Paul, though some deny this. For then first appeared the
sacrifice which is now offered to God by Christians in the whole wide
world, and that is fulfilled which long after the event was said by
the prophet to Christ, who was yet to come in the flesh, "Thou art a
priest for ever after the order of Melchizedek," [908] --that is to
say, not after the order of Aaron, for that order was to be taken away
when the things shone forth which were intimated beforehand by these
shadows.
Footnotes
[908] Ps. cx. 4.
Chapter 23.--Of the Word of the Lord to Abraham, by Which It Was
Promised to Him that His Posterity Should Be Multiplied According to
the Multitude of the Stars; On Believing Which He Was Declared
Justified While Yet in Uncircumcision.
The word of the Lord came to Abraham in a vision also. For when God
promised him protection and exceeding great reward, he, being
solicitous about posterity, said that a certain Eliezer of Damascus,
born in his house, would be his heir. Immediately he was promised an
heir, not that house-born servant, but one who was to come forth of
Abraham himself; and again a seed innumerable, not as the dust of the
earth, but as the stars of heaven,--which rather seems to me a promise
of a posterity exalted in celestial felicity. For, so far as
multitude is concerned, what are the stars of heaven to the dust of
the earth, unless one should say the comparison is like inasmuch as
the stars also cannot be numbered? For it is not to be believed that
all of them can be seen. For the more keenly one observes them, the
more does he see. So that it is to be supposed some remain concealed
from the keenest observers, to say nothing of those stars which are
said to rise and set in another part of the world most remote from
us. Finally, the authority of this book condemns those like Aratus or
Eudoxus, or any others who boast that they have found out and written
down the complete number of the stars. Here, indeed, is set down that
sentence which the apostle quotes in order to commend the grace of
God, "Abraham believed God, and it was counted to him for
righteousness;" [909] lest the circumcision should glory, and be
unwilling to receive the uncircumcised nations to the faith of
Christ. For at the time when he believed, and his faith was counted
to him for righteousness, Abraham had not yet been circumcised.
Footnotes
[909] Rom. iv. 3; Gen. xv. 6.
Chapter 24.--Of the Meaning of the Sacrifice Abraham Was Commanded to
Offer When He Supplicated to Be Taught About Those Things He Had
Believed.
In the same vision, God in speaking to him also says, "I am God that
brought thee out of the region of the Chaldees, to give thee this land
to inherit it." [910]And when Abram asked whereby he might know
that he should inherit it, God said to him, "Take me an heifer of
three years old, and a she-goat of three years old, and a ram of three
years old, and a turtle-dove, and a pigeon. And he took unto him all
these, and divided them in the midst, and laid each piece one against
another; but the birds divided he not. And the fowls came down," as
it is written, "on the carcasses, and Abram sat down by them. But
about the going down of the sun, great fear fell upon Abram; and, lo,
an horror of great darkness fell upon him. And He said unto Abram,
Know of a surety that thy seed shall be a stranger in a land not
theirs, and they shall reduce them to servitude and shall afflict them
four hundred years: but the nation whom they shall serve will I
judge; and afterward shall they come out hither with great substance.
And thou shalt go to thy fathers in peace; kept in a good old age.
But in the fourth generation they shall come hither again: for the
iniquity of the Amorites is not yet full. And when the sun was
setting, there was a flame, and a smoking furnace, and lamps of fire,
that passed through between those pieces. In that day the Lord made a
covenant with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed will I give this land, from
the river of Egypt unto the great river Euphrates: the Kenites, and
the Kenizzites, and the Kadmonites, and the Hittites, and the
Perizzites, and the Rephaims, and the Amorites, and the Canaanites,
and the Hivites, and the Girgashites, and the Jebusites." [911]
All these things were said and done in a vision from God; but it would
take long, and would exceed the scope of this work, to treat of them
exactly in detail. It is enough that we should know that, after it
was said Abram believed in God, and it was counted to him for
righteousness, he did not fail in faith in saying, "Lord God, whereby
shall I know that I shall inherit it?" for the inheritance of that
land was promised to him. Now he does not say, How shall I know, as
if he did not yet believe; but he says, "Whereby shall I know,"
meaning that some sign might be given by which he might know the
manner of those things which he had believed, just as it is not for
lack of faith the Virgin Mary says, "How shall this be, seeing I know
not a man?" [912] for she inquired as to the way in which that should
take place which she was certain would come to pass. And when she
asked this, she was told, "The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee, and
the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee." [913]Here also, in
fine, a symbol was given, consisting of three animals, a heifer, a
she-goat, and a ram, and two birds, a turtle-dove and pigeon, that he
might know that the things which he had not doubted should come to
pass were to happen in accordance with this symbol. Whether,
therefore, the heifer was a sign that the people should be put under
the law, the she-goat that the same people was to become sinful, the
ram that they should reign (and these animals are said to be of three
years old for this reason, that there are three remarkable divisions
of time, from Adam to Noah, and from him to Abraham, and from him to
David, who, on the rejection of Saul, was first established by the
will of the Lord in the kingdom of the Israelite nation: in this
third division, which extends from Abraham to David, that people grew
up as if passing through the third age of life), or whether they had
some other more suitable meaning, still I have no doubt whatever that
spiritual things were prefigured by them as well as by the turtle-dove
and pigeon. And it is said, "But the birds divided he not," because
carnal men are divided among themselves, but the spiritual not at all,
whether they seclude themselves from the busy conversation of men,
like the turtle-dove, or dwell among them, like the pigeon; for both
birds are simple and harmless, signifying that even in the Israelite
people, to which that land was to be given, there would be individuals
who were children of the promise, and heirs of the kingdom that is
[914] to remain in eternal felicity. But the fowls coming down on the
divided carcasses represent nothing good, but the spirits of this air,
seeking some food for themselves in the division of carnal men. But
that Abraham sat down with them, signifies that even amid these
divisions of the carnal, true believers shall persevere to the end.
And that about the going down of the sun great fear fell upon Abraham
and a horror of great darkness, signifies that about the end of this
world believers shall be in great perturbation and tribulation, of
which the Lord said in the gospel, "For then shall be great
tribulation, such as was not from the beginning." [915]
But what is said to Abraham, "Know of a surety that thy seed shall be
a stranger in a land not theirs, and they shall reduce them to
servitude, and shall afflict them 400 years," is most clearly a
prophecy about the people of Israel which was to be in servitude in
Egypt. Not that this people was to be in that servitude under the
oppressive Egyptians for 400 years, but it is foretold that this
should take place in the course of those 400 years. For as it is
written of Terah the father of Abraham, "And the days of Terah in
Haran were 205 years," [916] not because they were all spent there,
but because they were completed there, so it is said here also, "And
they shall reduce them to servitude, and shall afflict them 400
years," for this reason, because that number was completed, not
because it was all spent in that affliction. The years are said to be
400 in round numbers, although they were a little more,--whether you
reckon from this time, when these things were promised to Abraham, or
from the birth of Isaac, as the seed of Abraham, of which these things
are predicted. For, as we have already said above, from the
seventy-fifth year of Abraham, when the first promise was made to him,
down to the exodus of Israel from Egypt, there are reckoned 430 years,
which the apostle thus mentions: "And this I say, that the covenant
confirmed by God, the law, which was made 430 years after, cannot
disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect." [917]So
then these 430 years might be called 400, because they are not much
more, especially since part even of that number had already gone by
when these things were shown and said to Abraham in vision, or when
Isaac was born in his father's 100th year, twenty-five years after the
first promise, when of these 430 years there now remained 405, which
God was pleased to call 400. No one will doubt that the other things
which follow in the prophetic words of God pertain to the people of
Israel.
When it is added, "And when the sun was now setting there was a flame,
and lo, a smoking furnace, and lamps of fire, which passed through
between those pieces," this signifies that at the end of the world the
carnal shall be judged by fire. For just as the affliction of the
city of God, such as never was before, which is expected to take place
under Antichrist, was signified by Abraham's horror of great darkness
about the going down of the sun, that is, when the end of the world
draws nigh,--so at the going down of the sun, that is, at the very end
of the world, there is signified by that fire the day of judgment,
which separates the carnal who are to be saved by fire from those who
are to be condemned in the fire. And then the covenant made with
Abraham particularly sets forth the land of Canaan, and names eleven
tribes in it from the river of Egypt even to the great river
Euphrates. It is not then from the great river of Egypt, that is, the
Nile, but from a small one which separates Egypt from Palestine, where
the city of Rhinocorura is.
Footnotes
[910] Gen. xv. 7.
[911] Gen. xv. 9-21.
[912] Luke i. 34.
[913] Luke i. 35.
[914] Various reading, "who are to remain."
[915] Matt. xxiv. 21.
[916] Gen. xi. 32.
[917] Gal. iii. 17.
Chapter 25.--Of Sarah's Handmaid, Hagar, Whom She Herself Wished to Be
Abraham's Concubine.
And here follow the times of Abraham's sons, the one by Hagar the bond
maid, the other by Sarah the free woman, about whom we have already
spoken in the previous book. As regards this transaction, Abraham is
in no way to be branded as guilty concerning this concubine, for he
used her for the begetting of progeny, not for the gratification of
lust; and not to insult, but rather to obey his wife, who supposed it
would be solace of her barrenness if she could make use of the
fruitful womb of her handmaid to supply the defect of her own nature,
and by that law of which the apostle says, "Likewise also the husband
hath not power of his own body, but the wife," [918] could, as a wife,
make use of him for childbearing by another, when she could not do so
in her own person. Here there is no wanton lust, no filthy lewdness.
The handmaid is delivered to the husband by the wife for the sake of
progeny, and is received by the husband for the sake of progeny, each
seeking, not guilty excess, but natural fruit. And when the pregnant
bond woman despised her barren mistress, and Sarah, with womanly
jealousy, rather laid the blame of this on her husband, even then
Abraham showed that he was not a slavish lover, but a free begetter of
children, and that in using Hagar he had guarded the chastity of Sarah
his wife, and had gratified her will and not his own,--had received
her without seeking, had gone in to her without being attached, had
impregnated without loving her,--for he says, "Behold thy maid is in
thy hands: do to her as it pleaseth thee;" [919] a man able to use
women as a man should,--his wife temperately, his handmaid
compliantly, neither intemperately!
Footnotes
[918] 1 Cor. vii. 4.
[919] Gen. xvi. 6.
Chapter 26.--Of God's Attestation to Abraham, by Which He Assures Him,
When Now Old, of a Son by the Barren Sarah, and Appoints Him the
Father of the Nations, and Seals His Faith in the Promise by the
Sacrament of Circumcision.
After these things Ishmael was born of Hagar; and Abraham might think
that in him was fulfilled what God had promised him, saying, when he
wished to adopt his home-born servant, "This shall not be thine heir;
but he that shall come forth of thee, he shall be thine heir." [920]
Therefore, lest he should think that what was promised was fulfilled
in the handmaid's son, "when Abram was ninety years old and nine, God
appeared to him, and said unto him, I am God; be well-pleasing in my
sight, and be without complaint, and I will make my covenant between
me and thee, and will fill thee exceedingly." [921]
Here there are more distinct promises about the calling of the nations
in Isaac, that is, in the son of the promise, by which grace is
signified, and not nature; for the son is promised from an old man and
a barren old woman. For although God effects even the natural course
of procreation, yet where the agency of God is manifest, through the
decay or failure of nature, grace is more plainly discerned. And
because this was to be brought about, not by generation, but by
regeneration, circumcision was enjoined now, when a son was promised
of Sarah. And by ordering all, not only sons, but also home-born and
purchased servants to be circumcised, he testifies that this grace
pertains to all. For what else does circumcision signify than a
nature renewed on the putting off of the old? And what else does the
eighth day mean than Christ, who rose again when the week was
completed, that is, after the Sabbath? The very names of the parents
are changed: all things proclaim newness, and the new covenant is
shadowed forth in the old. For what does the term old covenant imply
but the concealing of the new? And what does the term new covenant
imply but the revealing of the old? The laughter of Abraham is the
exultation of one who rejoices, not the scornful laughter of one who
mistrusts. And those words of his in his heart, "Shall a son be born
to me that am an hundred years old? and shall Sarah, that is ninety
years old, bear?" are not the words of doubt, but of wonder. And when
it is said, "And I will give to thee, and to thy seed after thee, the
land in which thou art a stranger, all the land of Canaan, for an
everlasting possession," if it troubles any one whether this is to be
held as fulfilled, or whether its fulfilment may still be looked for,
since no kind of earthly possession can be everlasting for any nation
whatever, let him know that the word translated everlasting, by our
writers is what the Greeks term aio;nion, which is derived from aio;n,
the Greek for sæculum, an age. But the Latins have not ventured to
translate this by secular, lest they should change the meaning into
something widely different. For many things are called secular which
so happen in this world as to pass away even in a short time; but what
is termed aio;nion either has no end, or lasts to the very end of this
world.
Footnotes
[920] Gen. xv. 4.
[921] Gen. xvii. 1-22. The passage is given in full by Augustin.
Chapter 27.--Of the Male, Who Was to Lose His Soul If He Was Not
Circumcised on the Eighth Day, Because He Had Broken God's Covenant.
When it is said, "The male who is not circumcised in the flesh of his
foreskin, that soul shall be cut off from his people, because he hath
broken my covenant," [922] some may be troubled how that ought to be
understood, since it can be no fault of the infant whose life it is
said must perish; nor has the covenant of God been broken by him, but
by his parents, who have not taken care to circumcise him. But even
the infants, not personally in their own life, but according to the
common origin of the human race, have all broken God's covenant in
that one in whom all have sinned. [923]Now there are many things
called God's covenants besides those two great ones, the old and the
new, which any one who pleases may read and know. For the first
covenant, which was made with the first man, is just this: "In the
day ye eat thereof, ye shall surely die." [924]Whence it is written
in the book called Ecclesiasticus, "All flesh waxeth old as doth a
garment. For the covenant from the beginning is, Thou shall die the
death." [925]Now, as the law was more plainly given afterward, and
the apostle says, "Where no law is, there is no prevarication," [926]
on what supposition is what is said in the psalm true, "I accounted
all the sinners of the earth prevaricators," [927] except that all who
are held liable for any sin are accused of dealing deceitfully
(prevaricating) with some law? If on this account, then, even the
infants are, according to the true belief, born in sin, not actual but
original, so that we confess they have need of grace for the remission
of sins, certainly it must be acknowledged that in the same sense in
which they are sinners they are also prevaricators of that law which
was given in Paradise, according to the truth of both scriptures, "I
accounted all the sinners of the earth prevaricators," and "Where no
law is, there is no prevarication." And thus, be cause circumcision
was the sign of regeneration, and the infant, on account of the
original sin by which God's covenant was first broken, was not
undeservedly to lose his generation unless delivered by regeneration,
these divine words are to be understood as if it had been said,
Whoever is not born again, that soul shall perish from his people,
because he hath broken my covenant, since he also has sinned in Adam
with all others. For had He said, Because he hath broken this my
covenant, He would have compelled us to understand by it only this of
circumcision; but since He has not expressly said what covenant the
infant has broken, we are free to understand Him as speaking of that
covenant of which the breach can be ascribed to an infant. Yet if any
one contends that it is said of nothing else than circumcision, that
in it the infant has broken the covenant of God because, he is not
circumcised, he must seek some method of explanation by which it may
be understood without absurdity (such as this) that he has broken the
covenant, because it has been broken in him although not by him. Yet
in this case also it is to be observed that the soul of the infant,
being guilty of no sin of neglect against itself, would perish
unjustly, unless original sin rendered it obnoxious to punishment.
Footnotes
[922] Gen. xvii. 14.
[923] Rom. v. 12, 19.
[924] Gen. ii. 17.
[925] Ecclus. xv. 17.
[926] Rom. iv. 15.
[927] Ps. cxix. 119. Augustin and the Vulgate follow the LXX.
Chapter 28.--Of the Change of Name in Abraham and Sarah, Who Received
the Gift of Fecundity When They Were Incapable of Regeneration Owing
to the Barrenness of One, and the Old Age of Both.
Now when a promise so great and clear was made to Abraham, in which it
was so plainly said to him, "I have made thee a father of many
nations, and I will increase thee exceedingly, and I will make nations
of thee, and kings shall go forth of thee. And I will give thee a son
of Sarah; and I will bless him, and he shall become nations, and kings
of nations shall be of him," [928] --a promise which we now see
fulfilled in Christ,--from that time forward this couple are not
called in Scripture, as formerly, Abram and Sarai, but Abraham and
Sarah, as we have called them from the first, for every one does so
now. The reason why the name of Abraham was changed is given: "For,"
He says, "I have made thee a father of many nations." This, then, is
to be understood to be the meaning of Abraham; but Abram, as he was
formerly called, means "exalted father." The reason of the change of
Sarah's name is not given; but as those say who have written
interpretations of the Hebrew names contained in these books, Sarah
means "my princess," and Sarai "strength." Whence it is written in
the Epistle to the Hebrews, "Through faith also Sarah herself received
strength to conceive seed." [929]For both were old, as the
Scripture testifies; but she was also barren, and had ceased to
menstruate, so that she could no longer bear children even if she had
not been barren. Further, if a woman is advanced in years, yet still
retains the custom of women, she can bear children to a young man, but
not to an old man, although that same old man can beget, but only of a
young woman; as after Sarah's death Abraham could of Keturah, because
he met with her in her lively age. This, then, is what the apostle
mentions as wonderful, saying, besides, that Abraham's body was now
dead; [930] because at that age he was no longer able to beget
children of any woman who retained now only a small part of her
natural vigor. Of course we must understand that his body was dead
only to some purposes, not to all; for if it was so to all, it would
no longer be the aged body of a living man, but the corpse of a dead
one. Although that question, how Abraham begot children of Keturah,
is usually solved in this way, that the gift of begetting which he
received from the Lord, remained even after the death of his wife, yet
I think that solution of the question which I have followed is
preferable, because, although in our days an old man of a hundred
years can beget children of no woman, it was not so then, when men
still lived so long that a hundred years did not yet bring on them the
decrepitude of old age.
Footnotes
[928] Gen. xvii. 5, 6, 16.
[929] Heb. xi. 11.
[930] Heb. xi. 12.
Chapter 29.--Of the Three Men or Angels, in Whom the Lord is Related
to Have Appeared to Abraham at the Oak of Mamre.
God appeared again to Abraham at the oak of Mamre in three men, who it
is not to be doubted were angels, although some think that one of them
was Christ, and assert that He was visible before He put on flesh.
Now it belongs to the divine power, and invisible, incorporeal, and
incommutable nature, without changing itself at all, to appear even to
mortal men, not by what it is, but by what is subject to it. And what
is not subject to it? Yet if they try to establish that one of these
three was Christ by the fact that, although he saw three, he addressed
the Lord in the singular, as it is written, "And, lo, three men stood
by him: and, when he saw them, he ran to meet them from the
tent-door, and worshipped toward the ground, and said, Lord, if I have
found favor before thee," [931] etc.; why do they not advert to this
also, that when two of them came to destroy the Sodomites, while
Abraham still spoke to one, calling him Lord, and interceding that he
would not destroy the righteous along with the wicked in Sodom, Lot
received these two in such a way that he too in his conversation with
them addressed the Lord in the singular? For after saying to them in
the plural, "Behold, my lords, turn aside into your servant's house,"
[932] etc., yet it is afterwards said, "And the angels laid hold upon
his hand, and the hand of his wife, and the hands of his two
daughters, because the Lord was merciful unto him. And it came to
pass, whenever they had led him forth abroad, that they said, Save thy
life; look not behind thee, neither stay thou in all this region:
save thyself in the mountain, lest thou be caught. And Lot said unto
them, I pray thee, Lord, since thy servant hath found grace in thy
sight," [933] etc. And then after these words the Lord also answered
him in the singular, although He was in two angels, saying, "See, I
have accepted thy face," [934] etc. This makes it much more credible
that both Abraham in the three men and Lot in the two recognized the
Lord, addressing Him in the singular number, even when they were
addressing men; for they received them as they did for no other reason
than that they might minister human refection to them as men who
needed it. Yet there was about them something so excellent, that
those who showed them hospitality as men could not doubt that God was
in them as He was wont to be in the prophets, and therefore sometimes
addressed them in the plural, and sometimes God in them in the
singular. But that they were angels the Scripture testifies, not only
in this book of Genesis, in which these transactions are related, but
also in the Epistle to the Hebrews, where in praising hospitality it
is said, "For thereby some have entertained angels unawares." [935]
By these three men, then, when a son Isaac was again promised to
Abraham by Sarah, such a divine oracle was also given that it was
said, "Abraham shall become a great and numerous nation, and all the
nations of the earth shall be blessed in him." [936]And here these
two things, are promised with the utmost brevity and fullness,--the
nation of Israel according to the flesh, and all nations according to
faith.
Footnotes
[931] Gen. xviii. 2, 3.
[932] Gen. xix. 2.
[933] Gen. xix. 16-19.
[934] Gen. xix. 21.
[935] Heb. xiii. 2.
[936] Gen. xviii. 18.
Chapter 30.--Of Lot's Deliverance from Sodom, and Its Consumption by
Fire from Heaven; And of Abimelech, Whose Lust Could Not Harm Sarah's
Chastity.
After this promise Lot was delivered out of Sodom, and a fiery rain
from heaven turned into ashes that whole region of the impious city,
where custom had made sodomy as prevalent as laws have elsewhere made
other kinds of wickedness. But this punishment of theirs was a
specimen of the divine judgment to come. For what is meant by the
angels forbidding those who were delivered to look back, but that we
are not to look back in heart to the old life which, being regenerated
through grace, we have put off, if we think to escape the last
judgment? Lot's wife, indeed, when she looked back, remained, and,
being turned into salt, furnished to believing men a condiment by
which to savor somewhat the warning to be drawn from that example.
Then Abraham did again at Gerar, with Abimelech the king of that city,
what he had done in Egypt about his wife, and received her back
untouched in the same way. On this occasion, when the king rebuked
Abraham for not saying she was his wife, and calling her his sister,
he explained what he had been afraid of, and added this further, "And
yet indeed she is my sister by the father's side, but not by the
mother's; [937] for she was Abraham's sister by his own father, and so
near of kin. But her beauty was so great, that even at that advanced
age she could be fallen in love with.
Footnotes
[937] Gen. xx. 12.
Chapter 31.--Of Isaac, Who Was Born According to the Promise, Whose
Name Was Given on Account of the Laughter of Both Parents.
After these things a son was born to Abraham, according to God's
promise, of Sarah, and was called Isaac, which means laughter. For
his father had laughed when he was promised to him, in wondering
delight, and his mother, when he was again promised by those three
men, had laughed, doubting for joy; yet she was blamed by the angel
because that laughter, although it was for joy, yet was not full of
faith. Afterwards she was confirmed in faith by the same angel. From
this, then, the boy got his name. For when Isaac was born and called
by that name, Sarah showed that her laughter was not that of scornful
reproach, but that of joyful praise; for she said, "God hath made me
to laugh, so that every one who hears will laugh with me." [938]
Then in a little while the bond maid was cast out of the house with
her son; and, according to the apostle, these two women signify the
old and new covenants,--Sarah representing that of the Jerusalem which
is above, that is, the city of God. [939]
Footnotes
[938] Gen. xxi. 6.
[939] Gal. iv. 24-26.
Chapter 32.--Of Abraham's Obedience and Faith, Which Were Proved by
the Offering Up, of His Son in Sacrifice, and of Sarah's Death.
Among other things, of which it would take too long time to mention
the whole, Abraham was tempted about the offering up of his
well-beloved son Isaac, to prove his pious obedience, and so make it
known to the world, not to God. Now every temptation is not
blame-worthy; it may even be praise-worthy, because it furnishes
probation. And, for the most part, the human mind cannot attain to
self-knowledge otherwise than by making trial of its powers through
temptation, by some kind of experimental and not merely verbal
self-interrogation; when, if it has acknowledged the gift of God, it
is pious, and is consolidated by steadfast grace and not puffed up by
vain boasting. Of course Abraham could never believe that God
delighted in human sacrifices; yet when the divine commandment
thundered, it was to be obeyed, not disputed. Yet Abraham is worthy
of praise, because he all along believed that his son, on being
offered up, would rise again; for God had said to him, when he was
unwilling to fulfill his wife's pleasure by casting out the bond maid
and her son, "In Isaac shall thy seed be called." No doubt He then
goes on to say, "And as for the son of this bond woman, I will make
him a great nation, because he is thy seed." [940]How then is it
said "In Isaac shall thy seed be called," when God calls Ishmael also
his seed? The apostle, in explaining this, says, "In Isaac shall thy
seed be called, that is, they which are the children of the flesh,
these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise
are counted for the seed." [941]In order, then, that the children
of the promise may be the seed of Abraham, they are called in Isaac,
that is, are gathered together in Christ by the call of grace.
Therefore the father, holding fast from the first the promise which
behoved to be fulfilled through this son whom God had ordered him to
slay, did not doubt that he whom he once thought it hopeless he should
ever receive would be restored to him when he had offered him up. It
is in this way the passage in the Epistle to the Hebrews is also to be
understood and explained. "By faith," he says, "Abraham overcame,
when tempted about Isaac: and he who had received the promise offered
up his only son, to whom it was said, In Isaac shall thy seed be
called: thinking that God was able to raise him up, even from the
dead;" therefore he has added, "from whence also he received him in a
similitude." [942]In whose similitude but His of whom the apostle
says, "He that spared not His own Son, but delivered Him up for us
all?" [943]And on this account Isaac also himself carried to the
place of sacrifice the wood on which he was to be offered up, just as
the Lord Himself carried His own cross. Finally, since Isaac was not
to be slain, after his father was forbidden to smite him, who was that
ram by the offering of which that sacrifice was completed with typical
blood? For when Abraham saw him, he was caught by the horns in a
thicket. What, then, did he represent but Jesus, who, before He was
offered up, was crowned with thorns by the Jews?
But let us rather hear the divine words spoken through the angel. For
the Scripture says, "And Abraham stretched forth his hand to take the
knife, that he might slay his son. And the Angel of the Lord called
unto him from heaven, and said, Abraham. And he said, Here am I. And
he said, Lay not thine hand upon the lad, neither do thou anything
unto him: for now I know that thou fearest God, and hast not spared
thy beloved son for my sake." [944]It is said, "Now I know," that
is, Now I have made to be known; for God was not previously ignorant
of this. Then, having offered up that ram instead of Isaac his son,
"Abraham," as we read, "called the name of that place The Lord seeth:
as they say this day, In the mount the Lord hath appeared." [945]As
it is said, "Now I know," for Now I have made to be known, so here,
"The Lord sees," for The Lord hath appeared, that is, made Himself to
be seen. "And the Angel of the Lord called unto Abraham from heaven
the second time, saying, By myself have I sworn, saith the Lord;
because thou hast done this thing, and hast not spared thy beloved son
for my sake; that in blessing I will bless thee, and in multiplying I
will multiply thy seed as the stars of heaven, and as the sand which
is upon the seashore; and thy seed shall possess by inheritance the
cities of the adversaries: and in thy seed shall all the nations of
the earth be blessed; because thou hast obeyed my voice." [946]In
this manner is that promise concerning the calling of the nations in
the seed of Abraham confirmed even by the oath of God, after that
burnt-offering which typified Christ. For He had often promised, but
never sworn. And what is the oath of God, the true and faithful, but
a confirmation of the promise, and a certain reproof to the
unbelieving?
After these things Sarah died, in the 127th year of her life, and the
137th of her husband for he was ten years older than she, as he
himself says, when a son is promised to him by her: "Shall a son be
born to me that am an hundred years old? and shall Sarah, that is
ninety years old, bear?" [947]Then Abraham bought a field, in which
he buried his wife. And then, according to Stephen's account, he was
settled in that land, entering then on actual possession of it,--that
is, after the death of his father, who is inferred to have died two
years before.
Footnotes
[940] Gen. xxi. 12, 13.
[941] Rom. ix. 7, 8.
[942] Heb. xi. 17-19.
[943] Rom. viii. 32.
[944] Gen. xxii. 10-12.
[945] Gen. xxii. 14.
[946] Gen. xxii. 15-18.
[947] Gen. xvii. 17.
Chapter 33.--Of Rebecca, the Grand-Daughter of Nahor, Whom Isaac Took
to Wife.
Isaac married Rebecca, the grand-daughter of Nahor, his father's
brother, when he was forty years old, that is, in the 140th year of
his father's life, three years after his mother's death. Now when a
servant was sent to Mesopotamia by his father to fetch her, and when
Abraham said to that servant, "Put thy hand under my thigh, and I will
make thee swear by the Lord, the God of heaven, and the Lord of the
earth, that thou shalt not take a wife unto my son Isaac of the
daughters of the Canaanites," [948] what else was pointed out by this,
but that the Lord, the God of heaven, and the Lord of the earth, was
to come in the flesh which was to be derived from that thigh? Are
these small tokens of the foretold truth which we see fulfilled in
Christ?
Footnotes
[948] Gen. xxiv. 2, 3.
Chapter 34.--What is Meant by Abraham's Marrying Keturah After Sarah's
Death.
What did Abraham mean by marrying Keturah after Sarah's death? Far be
it from us to suspect him of incontinence, especially when he had
reached such an age and such sanctity of faith. Or was he still
seeking to beget children, though he held fast, with most approved
faith, the promise of God that his children should be multiplied out
of Isaac as the stars of heaven and the dust of the earth? And yet,
if Hagar and Ishmael, as the apostle teaches us, signified the carnal
people of the old covenant, why may not Keturah and her sons also
signify the carnal people who think they belong to the new covenant?
For both are called both the wives and the concubines of Abraham; but
Sarah is never called a concubine (but only a wife). For when Hagar
is given to Abraham, it is written. "And Sarai, Abram's wife, took
Hagar the Egyptian, her handmaid, after Abraham had dwelt ten years in
the land of Canaan, and gave her to her husband Abram to be his wife."
[949]And of Keturah, whom he took after Sarah's departure, we read,
"Then again Abraham took a wife, whose name was Keturah." [950]Lo!
both are called wives, yet both are found to have been concubines; for
the Scripture afterward says, "And Abraham gave his whole estate unto
Isaac his son. But unto the sons of his concubines Abraham gave
gifts, and sent them away from his son Isaac, (while he yet lived,)
eastward, unto the east country." [951]Therefore the sons of the
concubines, that is, the heretics and the carnal Jews, have some
gifts, but do not attain the promised kingdom; "For they which are the
children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the
children of the promise are counted for the seed, of whom it was said,
In Isaac shall thy seed be called." [952]For I do not see why
Keturah, who was married after the wife's death, should be called a
concubine, except on account of this mystery. But if any one is
unwilling to put such meanings on these things, he need not calumniate
Abraham. For what if even this was provided against the heretics who
were to be the opponents of second marriages, so that it might be
shown that it was no sin in the case of the father of many nations
himself, when, after his wife's death, he married again? And Abraham
died when he was 175 years old, so that he left his son Isaac
seventy-five years old, having begotten him when 100 years old.
Footnotes
[949] Gen. xvi. 3.
[950] Gen. xxv. 1.
[951] Gen. xxv. 5, 6.
[952] Rom. ix. 7, 8.
Chapter 35.--What Was Indicated by the Divine Answer About the Twins
Still Shut Up in the Womb of Rebecca Their Mother.
Let us now see how the times of the city of God run on from this point
among Abraham's descendants. In the time from the first year of
Isaac's life to the seventieth, when his sons were born, the only
memorable thing is, that when he prayed God that his wife, who was
barren, might bear, and the Lord granted what he sought, and she
conceived, the twins leapt while still enclosed in her womb. And when
she was troubled by this struggle, and inquired of the Lord, she
received this answer: "Two nations are in thy womb, and two manner of
people shall be separated from thy bowels; and the one people shall
overcome the other people, and the elder shall serve the younger."
[953]The Apostle Paul would have us understand this as a great
instance of grace; [954] for the children being not yet born, neither
having done any good or evil, the younger is chosen without any good
desert and the elder is rejected, when beyond doubt, as regards
original sin, both were alike, and as regards actual sin, neither had
any. But the plan of the work on hand does not permit me to speak
more fully of this matter now, and I have said much about it in other
works. Only that saying, "The elder shall serve the younger," is
understood by our writers, almost without exception, to mean that the
elder people, the Jews, shall serve the younger people, the
Christians. And truly, although this might seem to be fulfilled in
the Idumean nation, which was born of the elder (who had two names,
being called both Esau and Edom, whence the name Idumeans), because it
was afterwards to be overcome by the people which sprang from the
younger, that is, by the Israelites, and was to become subject to
them; yet it is more suitable to believe that, when it was said, "The
one people shall overcome the other people, and the elder shall serve
the younger," that prophecy meant some greater thing; and what is that
except what is evidently fulfilled in the Jews and Christians?
Footnotes
[953] Gen. xxv. 23.
[954] Rom. ix. 10-13.
Chapter 36.--Of the Oracle and Blessing Which Isaac Received, Just as
His Father Did, Being Beloved for His Sake.
Isaac also received such an oracle as his father had often received.
Of this oracle it is thus written: "And there was a famine over the
land, beside the first famine that was in the days of Abraham. And
Isaac went unto Abimelech king of the Philistines unto Gerar. And the
Lord appeared unto him, and said, Go not down into Egypt; but dwell in
the land which I shall tell thee of. And abide in this land, and I
will be with thee, and will bless thee: unto thee and unto thy seed I
will give all this land; and I will establish mine oath, which I sware
unto Abraham thy father: and I will multiply thy seed as the stars of
heaven, and will give unto thy seed all this land: and in thy seed
shall all the nations of the earth be blessed; because that Abraham
thy father obeyed my voice, and kept my precepts, my commandments, my
righteousness, and my laws." [955]This patriarch neither had
another wife, nor any concubine, but was content with the
twin-children begotten by one act of generation. He also was afraid,
when he lived among strangers, of being brought into danger owing to
the beauty of his wife, and did like his father in calling her his
sister, and not telling that she was his wife; for she was his near
blood-relation by the father's and mother's side. She also remained
untouched by the strangers, when it was known she was his wife. Yet
we ought not to prefer him to his father because he knew no woman
besides his one wife. For beyond doubt the merits of his father's
faith and obedience were greater, inasmuch as God says it is for his
sake He does Isaac good: "In thy seed," He says, "shall all the
nations of the earth be blessed, because that Abraham thy father
obeyed my voice, and kept my precepts, my commandments, my statutes,
and my laws." And again in another oracle He says, "I am the God of
Abraham thy father: fear not, for I am with thee, and will bless
thee, and multiply thy seed for my servant Abraham's sake." [956]So
that we must understand how chastely Abraham acted, because imprudent
men, who seek some support for their own wickedness in the Holy
Scriptures, think he acted through lust. We may also learn this, not
to compare men by single good things, but to consider everything in
each; for it may happen that one man has something in his life and
character in which he excels another, and it may be far more excellent
than that in which the other excels him. And thus, according to sound
and true judgment, while continence is preferable to marriage, yet a
believing married man is better than a continent unbeliever; for the
unbeliever is not only less praiseworthy, but is even highly
detestable. We must conclude, then, that both are good; yet so as to
hold that the married man who is most faithful and most obedient is
certainly better than the continent man whose faith and obedience are
less. But if equal in other things, who would hesitate to prefer the
continent man to the married?
Footnotes
[955] Gen. xxvi. 1-5.
[956] Gen. xxvi. 24.
Chapter 37.--Of the Things Mystically Prefigured in Esau and Jacob.
Isaac's two sons, Esau and Jacob, grew up together. The primacy of
the elder was transferred to the younger by a bargain and agreement
between them, when the elder immoderately lusted after the lentiles
the younger had prepared for food, and for that price sold his
birthright to him, confirming it with an oath. We learn from this
that a person is to be blamed, not for the kind of food he eats, but
for immoderate greed. Isaac grew old, and old age deprived him of his
eyesight. He wished to bless the elder son, and instead of the elder,
who was hairy, unwittingly blessed the younger, who put himself under
his father's hands, having covered himself with kid-skins, as if
bearing the sins of others. Lest we should think this guile of
Jacob's was fraudulent guile, instead of seeking in it the mystery of
a great thing, the Scripture has predicted in the words just before,
"Esau was a cunning hunter, a man of the field; and Jacob was a simple
man, dwelling at home." [957]Some of our writers have interpreted
this, "without guile." But whether the Greek alastos means "without
guile," or "simple," or rather "without reigning," in the receiving of
that blessing what is the guile of the man without guile? What is the
guile of the simple, what the fiction of the man who does not lie, but
a profound mystery of the truth? But what is the blessing itself?
"See," he says, "the smell of my son is as the smell of a full field
which the Lord hath blessed: therefore God give thee of the dew of
heaven, and of the fruitfulness of the earth, and plenty of corn and
wine: let nations serve thee, and princes adore thee: and be lord of
thy brethren, and let thy father's sons adore thee: cursed be he that
curseth thee, and blessed be he that blesseth thee." [958]The
blessing of Jacob is therefore a proclamation of Christ to all
nations. It is this which has come to pass, and is now being
fulfilled. Isaac is the law and the prophecy: even by the mouth of
the Jews Christ is blessed by prophecy as by one who knows not,
because it is itself not understood. The world like a field is filled
with the odor of Christ's name: His is the blessing of the dew of
heaven, that is, of the showers of divine words; and of the
fruitfulness of the earth, that is, of the gathering together of the
peoples: His is the plenty of corn and wine, that is, the multitude
that gathers bread and wine in the sacrament of His body and blood.
Him the nations serve, Him princes adore. He is the Lord of His
brethren, because His people rules over the Jews. Him His Father's
sons adore, that is, the sons of Abraham according to faith; for He
Himself is the son of Abraham according to the flesh. He is cursed
that curseth Him, and he that blesseth Him is blessed. Christ, I say,
who is ours is blessed, that is, truly spoken of out of the mouths of
the Jews, when, although erring, they yet sing the law and the
prophets, and think they are blessing another for whom they erringly
hope. So, when the elder son claims the promised blessing, Isaac is
greatly afraid, and wonders when he knows that he has blessed one
instead of the other, and demands who he is; yet he does not complain
that he has been deceived, yea, when the great mystery is revealed to
him, in his secret heart he at once eschews anger, and confirms the
blessing. "Who then," he says, "hath hunted me venison, and brought
it me, and I have eaten of all before thou camest, and have blessed
him, and he shall be blessed?" [959]Who would not rather have
expected the curse of an angry man here, if these things had been done
in an earthly manner, and not by inspiration from above? O things
done, yet done prophetically; on the earth, yet celestially; by men,
yet divinely! If everything that is fertile of so great mysteries
should be examined carefully, many volumes would be filled; but the
moderate compass fixed for this work compels us to hasten to other
things.
Footnotes
[957] Gen. xxv. 27.
[958] Gen. xxvii. 27-29.
[959] Gen. xxvii. 33.
Chapter 38.--Of Jacob's Mission to Mesopotamia to Get a Wife, and of
the Vision Which He Saw in a Dream by the Way, and of His Getting Four
Women When He Sought One Wife.
Jacob was sent by his parents to Mesopotamia that he might take a wife
there. These were his father's words on sending him: "Thou shall not
take a wife of the daughters of the Canaanites. Arise, fly to
Mesopotamia, to the house of Bethuel, thy mother's father, and take
thee a wife from thence of the daughters of Laban thy mother's
brother. And my God bless thee, and increase thee, and multiply thee;
and thou shalt be an assembly of peoples; and give to thee the
blessing of Abraham thy father, and to thy seed after thee; that thou
mayest inherit the land wherein thou dwellest, which God gave unto
Abraham." [960]Now we understand here that the seed of Jacob is
separated from Isaac's other seed which came through Esau. For when
it is said, "In Isaac shall thy seed be called," [961] by this seed is
meant solely the city of God; so that from it is separated Abraham's
other seed, which was in the son of the bond woman, and which was to
be in the sons of Keturah. But until now it had been uncertain
regarding Isaac's twin-sons whether that blessing belonged to both or
only to one of them; and if to one, which of them it was. This is now
declared when Jacob is prophetically blessed by his father, and it is
said to him, "And thou shalt be an assembly of peoples, and God give
to thee the blessing of Abraham thy father."
When Jacob was going to Mesopotamia, he received in a dream an oracle,
of which it is thus written: "And Jacob went out from the well of the
oath, [962] and went to Haran. And he came to a place, and slept
there, for the sun was set; and he took of the stones of the place,
and put them at his head, and slept in that place, and dreamed. And
behold a ladder set up on the earth, and the top of it reached to
heaven; and the angels of God ascended and descended by it. And the
Lord stood above it, and said, I am the God of Abraham thy father, and
the God of Isaac; fear not: the land whereon thou sleepest, to thee
will I give it, and to thy seed; and thy seed shall be as the dust of
the earth; and it shall be spread abroad to the sea, and to Africa,
and to the north, and to the east: and all the tribes of the earth
shall be blessed in thee and in thy seed. And, behold, I am with
thee, to keep thee in all thy way wherever thou goest, and I will
bring thee back into this land; for I will not leave thee, until I
have done all which I have spoken to thee of. And Jacob awoke out of
his sleep, and said, Surely the Lord is in this place, and I knew it
not. And he was afraid, and said, How dreadful is this place! this is
none other but the house of God, and this is the gate of heaven. And
Jacob arose, and took the stone that he had put under his head there,
and set it up for a memorial, and poured oil upon the top of it. And
Jacob called the name of that place the house of God." [963]This is
prophetic. For Jacob did not pour oil on the stone in an idolatrous
way, as if making it a god; neither did he adore that stone, or
sacrifice to it. But since the name of Christ comes from the chrism
or anointing, something pertaining to the great mystery was certainly
represented in this. And the Saviour Himself is understood to bring
this latter to remembrance in the gospel, when He says of Nathanael,
"Behold an Israelite indeed, in whom is no guile!" [964] because
Israel who saw this vision is no other than Jacob. And in the same
place He says, "Verily, verily, I say unto you, Ye shall see heaven
open, and the angels of God ascending and descending upon the Son of
man."
Jacob went on to Mesopotamia to take a wife from thence. And the
divine Scripture points out how, without unlawfully desiring any of
them, he came to have four women, of whom he begat twelve sons and one
daughter; for he had come to take only one. But when one was falsely
given him in place of the other, he did not send her away after
unwittingly using her in the night, lest he should seem to have put
her to shame; but as at that time, in order to multiply posterity, no
law forbade a plurality of wives, he took her also to whom alone he
had promised marriage. As she was barren, she gave her handmaid to
her husband that she might have children by her; and her elder sister
did the same thing in imitation of her, although she had borne,
because she desired to multiply progeny. We do not read that Jacob
sought any but one, or that he used many, except for the purpose of
begetting offspring, saving conjugal rights; and he would not have
done this, had not his wives, who had legitimate power over their own
husband's body, urged him to do it. So he begat twelve sons and one
daughter by four women. Then he entered into Egypt by his son Joseph,
who was sold by his brethren for envy, and carried there, and who was
there exalted.
Footnotes
[960] Gen. xxviii. 1-4.
[961] Gen. xxi. 12.
[962] Beer-sheba.
[963] Gen. xxviii. 10-19.
[964] John i. 47, 51.
Chapter 39.--The Reason Why Jacob Was Also Called Israel.
As I said a little ago, Jacob was also called Israel, the name which
was most prevalent among the people descended from him. Now this name
was given him by the angel who wrestled with him on the way back from
Mesopotamia, and who was most evidently a type of Christ. For when
Jacob overcame him, doubtless with his own consent, that the mystery
might be represented, it signified Christ's passion, in which the Jews
are seen overcoming Him. And yet he besought a blessing from the very
angel he had overcome; and so the imposition of this name was the
blessing. For Israel means seeing God, [965] which will at last be
the reward of all the saints. The angel also touched him on the
breadth of the thigh when he was overcoming him, and in that way made
him lame. So that Jacob was at one and the same time blessed and
lame: blessed in those among that people who believed in Christ, and
lame in the unbelieving. For the breadth of the thigh is the
multitude of the family. For there are many of that race of whom it
was prophetically said beforehand, "And they have halted in their
paths." [966]
Footnotes
[965] Gen. xxxii. 28: Israel = a prince of God; ver. 30; Peniel = the
face of God.
[966] Ps. xviii. 45.
Chapter 40.--How It is Said that Jacob Went into Egypt with
Seventy-Five Souls, When Most of Those Who are Mentioned Were Born at
a Later Period.
Seventy-five men are reported to have entered Egypt along with Jacob,
counting him with his children. In this number only two women are
mentioned, one a daughter, the other a grand-daughter. But when the
thing is carefully considered, it does not appear that Jacob's
offspring was so numerous on the day or year when he entered Egypt.
There are also included among them the great-grandchildren of Joseph,
who could not possibly be born already. For Jacob was then 130 years
old, and his son Joseph thirty-nine and as it is plain that he took a
wife when he was thirty or more, how could he in nine years have
great-grandchildren by the children whom he had by that wife? Now
since, Ephraim and Manasseh, the sons of Joseph, could not even have
children, for Jacob found them boys under nine years old when he
entered Egypt, in what way are not only their sons but their grandsons
reckoned among those seventy-five who then entered Egypt with Jacob?
For there is reckoned there Machir the son of Manasseh, grandson of
Joseph, and Machir's son, that is, Gilead, grandson of Manasseh,
great-grandson of Joseph; there, too, is he whom Ephraim, Joseph's
other son, begot, that is, Shuthelah, grandson of Joseph, and
Shuthelah's son Ezer, grandson of Ephraim, and great-grand-son of
Joseph, who could not possibly be in existence when Jacob came into
Egypt, and there found his grandsons, the sons of Joseph, their
grandsires, still boys under nine years of age. [967]But doubtless,
when the Scripture mentions Jacob's entrance into Egypt with
seventy-five souls, it does not mean one day, or one year, but that
whole time as long as Joseph lived, who was the cause of his
entrance. For the same Scripture speaks thus of Joseph: "And Joseph
dwelt in Egypt, he and his brethren, and all his father's house: and
Joseph lived 110 years, and saw Ephraim's children of the third
generation." [968]That is, his great-grandson, the third from
Ephraim; for the third generation means son, grandson,
great-grandson. Then it is added, "The children also of Machir, the
son of Manasseh, were born upon Joseph's knees." [969]And this is
that grandson of Manasseh, and great-grandson of Joseph. But the
plural number is employed according to scriptural usage; for the one
daughter of Jacob is spoken of as daughters, just as in the usage of
the Latin tongue liberi is used in the plural for children even when
there is only one. Now, when Joseph's own happiness is proclaimed,
because he could see his great-grandchildren, it is by no means to be
thought they already existed in the thirty-ninth year of their
great-grandsire Joseph, when his father Jacob came to him in Egypt.
But those who diligently look into these things will the less easily
be mistaken, because it is written, "These are the names of the sons
of Israel who entered into Egypt along with Jacob their father." [970]
For this means that the seventy-five are reckoned along with him,
not that they were all with him when he entered Egypt; for, as I have
said, the whole period during which Joseph, who occasioned his
entrance, lived, is held to be the time of that entrance.
Footnotes
[967] Augustin here follows the Septuagint, which at Gen. xlvi. 20
adds these names to those of Manasseh and Ephraim, and at ver. 27
gives the whole number as seventy-five. 1 Gen. l. 22, 23.
[968] Gen. l. 22, 23.
[969] Gen. l. 23.
[970] Gen. xlvi. 8.
Chapter 41.--Of the Blessing Which Jacob Promised in Judah His Son.
If, on account of the Christian people in whom the city of God
sojourns in the earth, we look for the flesh of Christ in the seed of
Abraham, setting aside the sons of the concubines, we have Isaac; if
in the seed of Isaac, setting aside Esau, who is also Edom, we have
Jacob, who also is Israel; if in the seed of Israel himself, setting
aside the rest, we have Judah, because Christ sprang of the tribe of
Judah. Let us hear, then, how Israel, when dying in Egypt, in
blessing his sons, prophetically blessed Judah. He says: "Judah, thy
brethren shall praise thee: thy hands shall be on the back of thine
enemies; thy father's children shall adore thee. Judah is a lion's
whelp: from the sprouting, my son, thou art gone up: lying down,
thou hast slept as a lion, and as a lion's whelp; who shall awake
him? A prince shall not be lacking out of Judah, and a leader from
his thighs, until the things come that are laid up for him; and He
shall be the expectation of the nations. Binding his foal unto the
vine, and his ass's foal to the choice vine; he shall wash his robe in
wine, and his clothes in the blood of the grape: his eyes are red
with wine, and his teeth are whiter than milk." [971]I have
expounded these words in disputing against Faustus the Manichæan; and
I think it is enough to make the truth of this prophecy shine, to
remark that the death of Christ is predicted by the word about his
lying down, and not the necessity, but the voluntary character of His
death, in the title of lion. That power He Himself proclaims in the
gospel, saying, "I have the power of laying down my life, and I have
the power of taking it again. No man taketh it from me; but I lay it
down of myself, and take it again." [972]So the lion roared, so He
fulfilled what He said. For to this power what is added about the
resurrection refers, "Who shall awake him?" This means that no man
but Himself has raised Him, who also said of His own body, "Destroy
this temple, and in three days I will raise it up." [973]And the
very nature of His death, that is, the height of the cross, is
understood by the single words "Thou are gone up." The evangelist
explains what is added, "Lying down, thou hast slept," when he says,
"He bowed His head, and gave up the ghost." [974]Or at least His
burial is to be understood, in which He lay down sleeping, and whence
no man raised Him, as the prophets did some, and as He Himself did
others; but He Himself rose up as if from sleep. As for His robe
which He washes in wine, that is, cleanses from sin in His own blood,
of which blood those who are baptized know the mystery, so that he
adds, "And his clothes in the blood of the grape," what is it but the
Church? "And his eyes are red with wine," [these are] His spiritual
people drunken with His cup, of which the psalm sings, "And thy cup
that makes drunken, how excellent it is!" "And his teeth are whiter
than milk," [975] --that is, the nutritive words which, according to
the apostle, the babes drink, being as yet unfit for solid food. [976]
And it is He in whom the promises of Judah were laid up, so that
until they come, princes, that is, the kings of Israel, shall never be
lacking out of Judah. "And He is the expectation of the nations."
This is too plain to need exposition.
Footnotes
[971] Gen. xlix. 8-12.
[972] John x. 18.
[973] John ii. 19.
[974] John xix. 30.
[975] Gen. xlix. 12.
[976] 1 Pet. ii. 2; 1 Cor. iii. 2.
Chapter 42.--Of the Sons of Joseph, Whom Jacob Blessed, Prophetically
Changing His Hands.
Now, as Isaac's two sons, Esau and Jacob, furnished a type of the two
people, the Jews and the Christians (although as pertains to carnal
descent it was not the Jews but the Idumeans who came of the seed of
Esau, nor the Christian nations but rather the Jews who came of
Jacob's; for the type holds only as regards the saying, "The elder
shall serve the younger" [977] ), so the same thing happened in
Joseph's two sons; for the elder was a type of the Jews, and the
younger of the Christians. For when Jacob was blessing them, and laid
his right hand on the younger, who was at his left, and his left hand
on the elder, who was at his right, this seemed wrong to their father,
and he admonished his father by trying to correct his mistake and show
him which was the elder. But he would not change his hands, but said,
"I know, my son, I know. He also shall become a people, and he also
shall be exalted; but his younger brother shall be greater than he,
and his seed shall become a multitude of nations." [978]And these
two promises show the same thing. For that one is to become "a
people;" this one "a multitude of nations." And what can be more
evident than that these two promises comprehend the people of Israel,
and the whole world of Abraham's seed, the one according to the flesh,
the other according to faith?
Footnotes
[977] Gen. xxv. 23.
[978] Gen. xlviii. 19.
Chapter 43.--Of the Times of Moses and Joshua the Son of Nun, of the
Judges, and Thereafter of the Kings, of Whom Saul Was the First, But
David is to Be Regarded as the Chief, Both by the Oath and by Merit.
Jacob being dead, and Joseph also, during the remaining 144 years
until they went out of the land of Egypt, that nation increased to an
incredible degree, even although wasted by so great persecutions, that
at one time the male children were murdered at their birth, because
the wondering Egyptians were terrified at the too great increase of
that people. Then Moses, being stealthily kept from the murderers of
the infants, was brought to the royal house, God preparing to do great
things by him, and was nursed and adopted by the daughter of Pharaoh
(that was the name of all the kings of Egypt), and became so great a
man that he--yea, rather God, who had promised this to Abraham, by
him--drew that nation, so wonderfully multiplied, out of the yoke of
hardest and most grievous servitude it had borne there. At first,
indeed, he fled thence (we are told he fled into the land of Midian),
because, in defending an Israelite, he had slain an Egyptian, and was
afraid. Afterward, being divinely commissioned in the power of the
Spirit of God, he overcame the magi of Pharaoh who resisted him.
Then, when the Egyptians would not let God's people go, ten memorable
plagues were brought by Him upon them,--the water turned into blood,
the frogs and lice, the flies, the death of the cattle, the boils, the
hail, the locusts, the darkness, the death of the first-born. At last
the Egyptians were destroyed in the Red Sea while pursuing the
Israelites, whom they had let go when at length they were broken by so
many great plagues. The divided sea made a way for the Israelites who
were departing, but, returning on itself, it overwhelmed their
pursuers with its waves. Then for forty years the people of God went
through the desert, under the leadership of Moses, when the tabernacle
of testimony was dedicated, in which God was worshipped by sacrifices
prophetic of things to come, and that was after the law had been very
terribly given in the mount, for its divinity was most plainly
attested by wonderful signs and voices. This took place soon after
the exodus from Egypt, when the people had entered the desert, on the
fiftieth day after the passover was celebrated by the offering up of a
lamb, which is so completely a type of Christ, foretelling that
through His sacrificial passion He should go from this world to the
Father (for pascha in, the Hebrew tongue means transit), that when the
new covenant was revealed, after Christ our passover was offered up,
the Holy Spirit came from heaven on the fiftieth day; and He is called
in the gospel the Finger of God, because He recalls to our remembrance
the things done before by way of types, and because the tables of that
law are said to have been written by the finger of God.
On the death of Moses, Joshua the son of Nun ruled the people, and led
them into the land of promise, and divided it among them. By these
two wonderful leaders wars were also carried on most prosperously and
wonderfully, God calling to witness that they had got these victories
not so much on account of the merit of the Hebrew people as on account
of the sins of the nations they subdued. After these leaders there
were judges, when the people were settled in the land of promise, so
that, in the meantime, the first promise made to Abraham began to be
fulfilled about the one nation, that is, the Hebrew, and about the
land of Canaan; but not as yet the promise about all nations, and the
whole wide world, for that was to be fulfilled, not by the observances
of the old law, but by the advent of Christ in the flesh, and by the
faith of the gospel. And it was to prefigure this that it was not
Moses, who received the law for the people on Mount Sinai, that led
the people into the land of promise, but Joshua, whose name also was
changed at God's command, so that he was called Jesus. But in the
times of the judges prosperity alternated with adversity in war,
according as the sins of the people and the mercy of God were
displayed.
We come next to the times of the kings. The first who reigned was
Saul; and when he was rejected and laid low in battle, and his
offspring rejected so that no kings should arise out of it, David
succeeded to the kingdom, whose son Christ is chiefly called. He was
made a kind of starting-point and beginning of the advanced youth of
God's people, who had passed a kind of age of puberty from Abraham to
this David. And it is not in vain that the evangelist Matthew records
the generations in such a way as to sum up this first period from
Abraham to David in fourteen generations. For from the age of puberty
man begins to be capable of generation; therefore he starts the list
of generations from Abraham, who also was made the father of many
nations when he got his name changed. So that previously this family
of God's people was in its childhood, from Noah to Abraham; and for
that reason the first language was then learned, that is, the Hebrew.
For man begins to speak in childhood, the age succeeding infancy,
which is so termed because then he cannot speak. [979]And that
first age is quite drowned in oblivion, just as the first age of the
human race was blotted out by the flood; for who is there that can
remember his infancy? Wherefore in this progress of the city of God,
as the previous book contained that first age, so this one ought to
contain the second and third ages, in which third age, as was shown by
the heifer of three years old, the she-goat of three years old, and
the ram of three years old, the yoke of the law was imposed, and there
appeared abundance of sins, and the beginning of the earthly kingdom
arose, in which there were not lacking spiritual men, of whom the
turtledove and pigeon represented the mystery.
Footnotes
[979] Infans, from in, not, and fari, to speak.
Also, see links to 600+ other Augustine Manuscripts:
/believe/txv/earlyche.htm
/believe/txv/earlychf.htm
/believe/txv/earlychg.htm
/believe/txv/earlychh.htm
/believe/txv/earlychi.htm
/believe/txv/earlychj.htm
/believe/txv/earlychk.htm
/believe/txv/earlychl.htm
/believe/txv/earlychm.htm
/believe/txv/earlychn.htm
E-mail to: BELIEVE
The main BELIEVE web-page (and the index to subjects) is at:
BELIEVE Religious Information Source - By Alphabet
http://mb-soft.com/believe/indexaz.html