Consider for a moment the Twins Paradox of Special Relativity. This is where twin brothers grew up on Earth. One stays on Earth and the other goes in a spaceship at nearly the speed of light to Alpha Centauri, says Hi, and immediately returns. Since A.C. is 4.3 Light Years away, the brother on Earth will have aged about 8.6 years during the trip. But, due to the Time Dilation (or Time Dilatation) consequence of Special Relativity, the traveling brother would only have aged a few weeks for EACH trip and would come back more than 8 years younger than his twin! From his point-of-view, he did not exceed the speed of light in doing this, because he would have seen the distance as seeming to be much shorter, a trip that logically took a few weeks to travel.

The Equivalence of Relativity also says that each brother would not be aware of anything unusual, in any experiment. Therefore the traveling brother would be in a totally self-consistent frame of reference. Any experiment he does would give him results identical to a similar experiment done by his brother on Earth. His clocks would seem (to him) to run properly and his body would seem to age normally. His perception would be that the DISTANCE to A.C. was much shorter than we perceive it to be, and so the trip of a few weeks would seem logical to him.

Public ServiceCategories |

Self-Sufficiency - Many Suggestions
Environmental Subjects Scientific Subjects Advanced Physics Social Subjects Religious Subjects Public Services Home Page Main Menu |

E-mail |

Now, consider that the traveling brother had a Cesium Clock,
based on molecular vibration. **He** would see it as having its
atoms vibrating at the expected rate, and thereby keeping correct
time (in his reference frame). The Earth-based observer would see
it as having its atoms vibrating more slowly, and therefore keeping
an apparently slowed time base, consistent with the apparent
slowing of time he observes for everything on the spacecraft.
The significant point here
is that the **atoms would appear to Earth to be vibrating more slowly
than they would appear in the rest frame of the atoms.**

Now say that the traveling twin also has some glowing Hydrogen gas. When he makes a spectrum of it he sees the standard expected spectrum lines of Hydrogen (with the correct rest-frame wavelengths). The Earth-based observer, taking a spectrum of the light from that same glowing Hydrogen gas, would see those lines as shifted to the red end of the spectrum, due to the apparent effect of the vibration of the atoms/electrons being slowed down due to the Time Dilation effect.

**This is a previously undescribed relativistic Red Shift.**
Near the speed of light, this effect becomes quite significant.

**This is NOT just another view of Relativistic Doppler Red Shifts.**
This can quickly be assured.
Doppler Shifts are to the red for receding sources and to the blue for
approaching sources. This Dilation Shift is to the red WHETHER THE
SOURCE IS RECEDING OR APPROACHING. The effect being described here
is a separate and previously undescribed phenomenon.

This means that, for approaching sources, there are two potentially large effects which oppose each other: The Doppler Shift is blue-ward and the Dilation Shift is red-ward. Since the Doppler effect is always larger, this creates the net effect of a Blue Shift, but smaller than previously thought, especially at relativistic velocities. For receding sources, the two effects are additive since they are both Red Shifts. The Dilation Red Shift effect can be as large as 30% of the magnitude of the Relativistic Doppler Shift. This means that for an empirically measured Red Shift, only about 3/4 of it (in that situation) can be attributed to Relativistic Doppler Shift This implies significantly reduced velocities of recession of distant galaxies. This is irrespective of the precise value of the Hubble constant. There are numerous implications of this modification, including much smaller dimensions for the Universe, and some alterations to the scatter chart graphs on which the Hubble Constant is determined.

This Time Dilation Red Shift is also not dependent on whether the atoms/electrons of Hydrogen were vibrating along the line-of-sight or perpendicular to it because the apparent passage of time, being slowed, is the base cause of the effect. Irrespective of the orientation of the atoms, time would appear to pass more slowly and therefore the apparent frequency and speed of the atoms and electrons must be slowed.

The Relativistic Gravitational Red Shift and the other known effects still remain valid, but those other effects are generally MUCH smaller than this Dilation Red Shift.

In their rest-frame, hydrogen atoms and their electrons oscillate at unique natural frequencies. A result of this is the creation of the well-known spectral line series of Hydrogen, such as the Balmer series. The frequency and wavelength of this emitted light is constant, and identifies the glowing gas unambiguously as Hydrogen, for viewers in the relativistic rest-frame of the source, that is, for viewers who have no relative velocity to the glowing Hydrogen source.

(There are several other relativistic effects that create a Red Shift, but their effects are extremely minimal for all known celestial objects and circumstances, so they will not be further discussed here.)

When relativistic velocities are involved, it is suggested that there is another significant contributing factor within the observed Red Shift.

In the case of the glowing Hydrogen, which is moving away from us at
a velocity near the speed of light, the individual atoms and electrons of
Hydrogen would appear to move more slowly, electron orbital energies
would seem smaller, and transitions from one state to another (during
ionization) would appear to involve smaller net quantities
of energy. **This would have two separate
effects, when viewed from Earth. The time interval between all viewed
oscillation cycle maxima would appear to be longer when viewed from Earth,
which would manifest itself as slower oscillations, and therefore
lower observed frequencies, and therefore a Red Shift. The apparent velocity
of the individual Hydrogen atoms would also be lower, which would manifest
itself as an apparent temperature lower than was actually the case.**

The first of these is a Red Shift, **whether the source is moving toward
OR away from the observer**. This fact, that this oscillation interval
appears longer to observers on Earth due to Time Dilation, when we
observe such atoms oscillating in a distant, relativistically traveling
source, causes us to see a lower frequency; that is, a redward-shifted
spectrum, for BOTH objects receding from us AND for objects
approaching us. Time Dilation appears to slow the passage of time
for both receding and approaching objects.

Molecules, atoms and electrons vibrating on the spaceship would also seem (to Earth observers) to have slowed down, so they would appear to Earth observers to be radiating energy at a lower frequency or redder color than would otherwise be the case; i.e. a Red Shift.

This effect is NOT just another way of describing the Relativistic
Doppler effect. **Where the Doppler effect shifts receding sources toward
the red and
approaching sources toward the blue, the Time Dilation effect ALWAYS
shifts the spectrum toward the red irrespective of direction.**
The effect being presented here is a unique and previously apparently
undescribed phenomenon.

A relativistic APPROACHING source would therefore be Blue-shifted because of the Doppler effect and also Red-shifted because of Time Dilation. It turns out that the Doppler effect always has greater magnitude, so the net effect would still be a Blue Shift, but significantly smaller than heretofore expected. A relativistically RECEDING source would be Red-shifted by BOTH effects. For that object, the observed Red Shift would be the sum of the two effects, and therefore greater than that from the Doppler effect alone.

where z is given as usual in octaves of wavelength shift.

For an object ACTUALLY receding from us at v = 0.6c, this would give a Doppler Red Shift z = 1.0 (one octave)

For an object ACTUALLY receding from us at v = 0.8c, this would give a Doppler Red Shift z = 2.0 (two octaves)

The Time Dilation effect (time slowing proportion) is given by:

For an object ACTUALLY receding from us at v = 0.6c, this gives a Time Dilation factor of 0.8, which represents a Dilation Red Shift of z = 0.32

**Therefore, an object ACTUALLY receding from us at 0.6c would exhibit a Red Shift of z = 1.32 instead of z = 1.0.**

For an object ACTUALLY receding from us at v = 0.8c, this gives a Time Dilation factor of 0.6, which represents a Dilation Red Shift of z = 0.74

**Therefore, an object receding from us at 0.8c would exhibit a Red Shift of z = 2.74 instead of z = 2.0.**

[NOTE: If the Time Dilation factor is 0.5, then time appears to pass
at exactly half its rest-frame rate, which would represent a
1.0 octave shift of the perceived frequency.
The conversion is given by:
z = -(log(TD_{f}))/(log(2)) ]

Currently, if an observed Red Shift has z = 1.32, it is assumed that, by assuming the entire effect to be relativistic Doppler, the velocity of recession, v = 0.687. This argument is showing that it is actually somewhat slower, at v = 0.600, because roughly 1/4 of the observed effect is actually due to Time Dilation Red Shift. The effect is very important.

Observed z |
(Old) Calculated Recessional Velocity /c Doppler Only |
Revised Calculated Recessional Velocity /c Doppler +Dilation |
Percent of total effect being Doppler |
---|---|---|---|

0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 99.93% |

0.01 | 0.010 | 0.010 | 99.3% |

0.10 | 0.095 | 0.090 | 93% |

0.50 | 0.385 | 0.334 | 83% |

1.00 | 0.600 | 0.518 | 77% |

2.00 | 0.800 | 0.719 | 74% |

3.00 | 0.883 | 0.822 | 73% |

4.00 | 0.923 | 0.879 | 73% |

5.00 | 0.946 | 0.913 | 74% |

7.00 | 0.969 | 0.951 | 76% |

This result substantially modifies a number of conclusions which have been long accepted by the scientific community. The assumption that the general distances of very distant galaxies, per the Hubble Constant, is due exclusively to relativistic Doppler reasons, is apparently incorrect. The observed Red Shift is still primarily due to Doppler effects, but the total observed shift is sometimes about 30% larger than that which would be due to relativistic Doppler alone. Therefore, the actual velocity of recession should often be calculated based on about 75% of the observed Red Shifts, leaving out the part due to Time Dilation. (see the table above).

(Please refer to the table above)

For example, for an observed Red Shift of one octave (z = 1.0), the traditional
relativistic Doppler calculations suggest a velocity of recession
of 0.6c. With consideration of this new Dilation factor, the
velocity of recession becomes about 0.518c. **This is a significant
change.** The Dilation Red Shift contribution becomes even more prominent
at higher total Red Shifts, with a maximum relative contribution at
about z = 3.04. At z = 5.0, the normally calculated v = 0.946c
becomes v = 0.913c.

This suggests that the actual distance of these galaxies and objects is considerably nearer than previously thought. With THIS consequence, the Universe is much smaller than previously thought, and therefore younger. Another major consequence of this is that the question of whether the Universe is open or closed is significantly altered. It may turn out that all the "missing mass" or "hidden matter" that has recently been postulated as necessary to describe the known Universe, may not be necessary. A smaller Universe (with the same mass) means the mutual gravitational effects of its component materials may be enough to explain all the empirical observations.

The ongoing discussions on the actual value of the Hubble constant, and its effects on the open-closed Universe topic are likely to be significantly altered.

There are many other consequences of this adjustment in explaining the Red Shifts we observe. Confirmation of the validity of this Dilation effect modification will likely affect many astrophysics disciplines.

Another interesting consequence exists. For light sources moving
toward us, the light has a Blue Shift due to relativistic Doppler,
but ALSO has a (smaller) Red Shift due to Time Dilation. The net
effect IS an observed Blue Shift, but could be of MUCH smaller extent than
would otherwise seem the case. Using some of the numbers mentioned
above, but for an approaching source at 0.6c, the Doppler Blue Shift would
again be 1.0 octave, and the Time Dilation Red Shift would again be 0.32
octave. The observed Blue Shift would be 0.68 octaves and not 1.0 octave as
previously expected. This suggests that there may be objects coming
**toward us** at higher velocities than previously thought.

This means that the lower apparent average atom velocity gives us received light that appears to come from a source of lower surface temperature than it actually is. The actual object surface temperature can be substantially higher. Consider an object that is moving away from us at an ACTUAL velocity of 0.87c. For this recessional velocity, Time Dilation makes time appear to pass at exactly half of its normal rate. Molecular and atomic velocities would therefore be half, as well. This means that effectively, we would see an object that indicates a surface temperature of half its actual rest-frame value.

Any text on thermodynamics tells that blackbody radiation rates go as the fourth power of the absolute temperature (the Stefan-Boltzmann law). This means that the object in question is actually radiating 16 times as much energy as previously thought.

This object would have an observed z = 3.8. (2.8 due to Relativistic Doppler and 1.0 due to Dilation). If the object had a higher total z than that, this temperature and radiation effect is even greater. An object that had z = 2.0 due to Dilation would be actually radiating 256 times as much energy as previously thought.

First Developed, Apr 1989,

First Submitted for Journal publication, Jun 1989, (but not accepted)

First Published on the Web: Jun 8, 1997

Occasionally slightly revised since.

This page - - **
** - - is at **
**

This subject presentation was last updated on - -

Link to the Public Services Home Page

index.html

Link to the Science Projects Index - Public Service

public/othersci.html

E-mail to: cj@mb-soft.com

C Johnson, Theoretical Physicist, Physics Degree from Univ. of Chicago